Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/439,727

THERMOPLASTIC ELASTOMER COMPOSITION AND MOLDED ARTICLE OF THE SAME

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Sep 15, 2021
Priority
Mar 18, 2019 — JP 2019-049728 +1 more
Examiner
LISTVOYB, GREGORY
Art Unit
1765
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Mitsui Chemicals Inc.
OA Round
6 (Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
811 granted / 1211 resolved
+2.0% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1240
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
72.8%
+32.8% vs TC avg
§102
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
§112
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1211 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The previous prior art rejection under Tohi (US 20160280819) in view of Ichino (WO 2016152711) maintained. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 3-8 and 17-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tohi (US 20160280819) in view of Ichino (WO 2016152711), both cited in previous Office Action. The rejection can be found in the NON-FINAL office action mailed 4/24/2025 and is herein incorporated by reference. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 5/13/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant submits that Tohi and Ichino do not teach thermoplastic elastomer composition. Applicant submits that Tohi does not provide any motivation to modify the propylene-based copolymer (B1) to make the ethylene-a-olefin-nonconjugated polyene copolymer (A) of claim 1. Examiner disagrees. As discussed during the interview held on 4/23/2026, Tohi clearly discloses non-conjugated polyene copolymer (see 1168). Applicant argues that Tohi does not teach or suggest that the propylene-based copolymer (B1) is related to the method for producing a propylene-based copolymer. However, independent claim 1 and dependent claims 3-8 and 17-19 drawn to a composition and do not stipulate a method of making it. Applicant argues that Tohi does not disclose or suggest that the copolymer (CO) is equivalent to the copolymer (7B-2) Examiner disagrees. Tohi teaches Propylene-α-Olefin Copolymer (7B-2) (see 2081). In addition, Tohi clearly discloses that a propylene-based copolymer (B1) contains a propylene component in an amount of 95 to 51 mol %, contains an α-olefin component, which is at least one selected from ethylene, 1-butene, 4-methylpentene-1,1-hexene, 1-octene and 1-decene, in an amount of 5 to 49 mol %, and contains a polyene component, which is at least one selected from conjugated or non-conjugated dienes (see 0098). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGORY LISTVOYB whose telephone number is (571)272-6105. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5pm EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Heidi Riviere Kelley can be reached at (571) 270-1831. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. GL /GREGORY LISTVOYB/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1765
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 10 earlier events
Dec 12, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 15, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 20, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 21, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 13, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679929
POLYESTER RESIN
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674022
METHOD FOR PRODUCING ALIPHATIC POLYESTER, ALIPHATIC POLYESTER RESIN, AND ALIPHATIC POLYESTER RESIN COMPOSITION
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662569
PROCESS FOR THE FREE RADICAL POLYMERIZATION OF THIONOLACTONES OR THIONOCARBONATES
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12662575
HIGHLY AROMATIC AND LIQUID-CRYSTALLINE HOMO-POLYIMIDES WITH AROMATIC ENDGROUPS AND CROSSLINKED PRODUCTS THEREFROM
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655252
Mixed Aromatic Amine Monomers And Polymers Thereof
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+29.4%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1211 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month