Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/452,090

ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR AND ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR DEVICE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 25, 2021
Priority
May 15, 2019 — JP 2019-092440 +1 more
Examiner
FIGUEROA, FELIX O
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
I-Pex Inc.
OA Round
6 (Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
7-8
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
532 granted / 916 resolved
-9.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
970
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
78.8%
+38.8% vs TC avg
§102
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
§112
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 916 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 6 and 14-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Horino et al. (US 10,862,234) in view of Nishimura et al. (US 8,888,506), J.S.T.MFG (JP S62-173188), and Miyazaki et al. (US 2019/0148855, previously cited on IDS). Regarding claim 6, Horino discloses an electrical connector (20), comprising: a housing (30); and a contact (50) that is attached to the housing and is connected to a wiring substrate (CB1), wherein the contact includes: a connection part (51) that is connected to the wiring substrate; a holding part (52, vertical leg between 51 and 53 in Fig. 12) that is joined to the connection part and extends in a vertical direction away from the wiring substrate (CB1); a joining part (54) including a first arm part (vertical leg between 53 and 54 in Fig. 12) that is joined to the holding part through a folding part (53) and extends in the vertical direction towards the wiring substrate, a second arm part (horizontal part, where 54 touches in Fig. 12) that extends so as to be provided along a principal surface of the wiring substrate, and a third arm (between 54 and 55 in Fig. 12) that extends away from the wiring substrate, an upper end of the third arm part being closer to the first arm part (left to right in Fig. 12) than a lower end of the third am part (is to the first arm part, Fig. 12); and a contact part (55) that is joined to the third arm part of the joining part and contacts a counterpart contact of a counterpart connector, the contact part being folded into an inverted U-shape relative to the third arm part (at 55), a first end of the contact part being joined to a tip of the third arm part and a second end of the contact part being inclined in an obliquely downward direction (Fig. 12); the housing including a central wall part (33) that faces the third arm part of the joining part, the folding part (53) is formed into an inverted U-shape with a first end joined to an upper end of the holding part and a second end joined to the first arm part of the joining part and including a proximal end contact part (56, Fig. 11) protruding towards the contact part (55), the proximal end contact part together with the contact part, contacting the counterpart contact of the counterpart connector (Fig. 24B); and the third arm part (leg between 54 and 55) of the joining part is elastically deformed from a state where the third arm part is separated from the central wall part (Fig. 23A), to contact the central wall part (33), in a case where the counterpart connector is mated therewith (Fig. 23B). Nishimura teaches a second arm part (at 26, Fig. 4) of the joining part that is elastically deformed from a state where the second arm part is separated from the bottom (Fig. 4), to contact the wiring bottom (64, Fig. 9), in a case where the counterpart connector is mated therewith. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the invention was effectively filed to be vertically deformable, as taught by Nishimura, in order to provide a smooth connection and increased contact between the contacts/terminals. J.S.T.MFG teaches (in Fig. 6) a surface of the first arm part (vertical portion of 5 contacting 4 in Fig. 6) of the joining part (5) to be in direct physical contact with a surface of the holding part (4). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the invention was effectively filed to form the joining and holding parts, as taught by J.S.T.MFG, in order to provide additional support and control flexing of the joining part. Miyazaki teaches a contact part (31) being folded into an inverted U-shape relative to the third arm part, a first end of the contact part being joined to a tip of the third arm part of the joining part and a second end of the contact part being inclined in an obliquely downward direction and facing the joining part (Fig. 7). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the invention was effectively filed to form the second end of the contact part facing the joining part, as taught by Miyizaki, in order to provide the desired spring characteristics for the contact part. Regarding claim 14, Horino discloses the holding part contacting a side wall part (at 33, Figs. 23A and 23B) of the housing and is held by the side wall part. Regarding claim 15, Horino discloses the contact part folded into an inverted U-shape and is joined to a tip of the joining part (Fig. 11). Regarding claim 16, Horino discloses a proximal end contact part (56) that protrudes toward the contact part, on a part of the folding part, wherein the proximal end contact part, together with the contact part, contacts a counterpart contact of the counterpart connector. Regarding claim 17, Horino discloses a shell (60, Fig. 12) that provided on an outer periphery of the housing, wherein a gap (S1) that is capable of viewing a tip of the connection part is formed between the housing and the shell. Regarding claim 18, Horino discloses an electrical connector device, comprising: the electrical connector according to claim 5; and the counterpart connector (70), wherein a recess part (92) that engages with the contact part is formed on the counterpart contact. Regarding claim 19, Horino discloses the holding part includes an extension part (rightmost 52 in Fig. 11) having a greater width in a transverse direction perpendicular to the vertical direction than a width of the terminal part (at 55) in the transverse direction. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claims have been considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection, as applied. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FELIX O FIGUEROA whose telephone number is (571)272-2003. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke can be reached on 571-272-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FELIX O FIGUEROA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2833
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 13 earlier events
Aug 18, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 01, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 24, 2025
Interview Requested
Dec 18, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 18, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 05, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640521
INSERT FOR A CONNECTOR
2y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633473
LONG-STROKE TRIGGER SWITCH WITH INSTANTANEOUS STRUCTURE
3y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627091
Electrical Connection Device
3y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12626848
MAGNETIC LATCHING CONNECTOR WITH ELECTRIC UNLATCH
2y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12612127
TURN SIGNAL SWITCH
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+14.7%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 916 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month