Office Action Predictor
Application No. 17/457,501

MEDICAL SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 03, 2021
Examiner
CLARK, RYAN T
Art Unit
3794
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Tsunami Medtech, LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 1m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

50%
Career Allow Rate
131 granted / 263 resolved
Without
With
+42.8%
Interview Lift
avg trend
4y 1m
Avg Prosecution
35 pending
298
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
51.7%
+11.7% vs TC avg
§102
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§112
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1 and 12 are currently amended. Claims 18-26 are canceled. A complete action on the merits of pending claims 1-17 appears below. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 10/29/25 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 1, 3-13, and 15-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sharma US 20190388133 in view of Zadno-Azizi US 20010049517. Regarding claim 1, Sharma teaches method of performing a catheter-based medical procedure in a duodenum of a subject (Fig. 23B), comprising: providing a catheter (Fig. 23A catheter 2340) with at least a first expandable member at a distal end thereof; expanding the first expandable member (Fig. 23A 2342 for claim 5 or 2344 for claim 4) engages with a duodenal mucosa wherein the surface of the first expandable member covers a major duodenal papilla (par. [0419] insulating membrane of balloon covering ampulla of vater); and applying energy to the duodenal mucosa adjacent the first expandable member when expanded to ablate the duodenal mucosa (par. [0418]). Sharma does not explicitly teach the first expandable member radially outward thereby increasing a volume of the first expandable member such that a surface of the first expandable member circumferentially. However, Sharma teaches a membrane that is expanded to cover sites in the duodenum (pars. [0418] and [0419]). Zadno-Azizi, in an analogous device, teaches where the expandable member can be a balloon, coil, ribbon, or tube (par. [0167]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to substitute the membrane ribbon of Sharma with the balloon of Zadno-Azizi. It is seen to preform equally as well and would yield the predictable result of expanding inside of the human body to cover tissue. Regarding claim 3, Sharma teaches further comprising expanding a second expandable member (Fig. 23A 2342 for claim 4 or 2344 for claim 5) spaced apart from the first expandable member, and wherein applying energy ablates a selected length of duodenal mucosa between the first expandable member and the second expandable member (par. [0418]). Regarding claim 4, Sharma teaches wherein the second expandable member is spaced apart proximally from the first expandable member (Fig. 23A 2342). Regarding claim 5, Sharma teaches wherein the second expandable member is spaced apart distally from the first expandable member (Fig. 23A 2344). Regarding claim 6, Sharma teaches wherein the selected length is from 5 cm to 25 cm (par. [0352]). Regarding claims 7-9, Sharma teaches wherein the second expandable member is positioned in a first/third/fourth part of the duodenum (Fig. 23B the parts don’t depend from one another nor are they claimed to be different; therefore, they are just a spot in the duodenum). Regarding claim 10, Sharma teaches wherein the catheter includes a second expandable member, wherein the first expandable member and the second expandable member comprise inflatable balloons (Fig. 23A). Regarding claim 11, Sharma teaches wherein applying energy is provided by a flowable media introduced through the catheter to the duodenal mucosa adjacent the first expandable member when expanded (par. [0417] and Fig. 23B). Regarding claim 12, Sharma teaches wherein the flowable media comprises a vapor that is adapted to undergo a vapor to liquid phase change to thereby apply energy to the duodenal mucosa (par. [0247] condensing of vapor to treat tissue). Regarding claim 13, Sharma teaches wherein the vapor is water vapor (par. [0265]). Regarding claims 15-17, Sharma teaches a broader range than the claimed wherein applying energy occurs at a rate of 15 cal/sec to 50 cal/sec, and wherein applying energy occurs for less than 20 seconds (par. [0352] 5-2500 cal/sec over 1-60 seconds). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to optimize the method of Sharma to have an energy rate of 15 cal/sec to 50 cal/sec for less than 20 seconds. Those of ordinary skill in the art know to manipulate parameters depending on the procedure being performed; therefore, they would use an energy rate of 15 cal/sec to 50 cal/sec for less than 20 seconds, or any appropriate parameter values, depending on the tissue being treated. Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sharma and Zadno-Azizi, as applied to claim 1 and further in view of Rajagopalan US 20200060942. Regarding claim 2, Sharma and Zadno-Azizi do not explicitly teach wherein the surface of the first expandable member covers a minor duodenal papilla. However, as seen in claim 1 Sharma teaches protecting tissue with the expandable member Rajagopalan, in an analogous method, teaches protecting different papilla, ducts, pylorus or a combination thereof in the duodenum (par. [0149]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to modify the method of Sharma and Zadno-Azizi to cover the minor papilla. This presents the advantage of not damaging non-target tissue (Rajagopalan par. [0149]). Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sharma and Zadno-Azizi, as applied to claim 1 and further in view of Lee US 20200253659. Regarding claim 14, Sharma does not explicitly teach wherein the vapor is at least partly alcohol. Lee, in an analogous method, teaches where the treatment fluid can be water, saline, or alcohol (par. [0011]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to substitute the water in Sharma and Zadno-Azizi to be alcohol. It is seen to perform equally as well and would yield the result of treating the tissue region of interest. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim 1 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on the same combination of reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RYAN T. CLARK whose telephone number is (408)918-7606. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 7AM-3PM MT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Linda Dvorak can be reached on (571)272-4764. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /R.T.C./Examiner, Art Unit 3794 /THOMAS A GIULIANI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3794
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 03, 2021
Application Filed
Dec 12, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 18, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 23, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Sep 21, 2025
Interview Requested
Oct 07, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 07, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 29, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 24, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 24, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12558158
ELECTROSURGICAL INSTRUMENT WITH NON-LIQUID THERMAL TRANSFER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12558141
ENERGIZABLE INSTRUMENT ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12551266
ENDOSCOPIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12551226
ENDOSCOPIC SURGICAL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12551267
Cutting Instrument
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+42.8%)
4y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 263 resolved cases by this examiner