Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/478,044

Training Data Generation Apparatus, Model Training Apparatus, Sample Characteristic Estimation Apparatus, and Chromatograph Mass Spectrometry Apparatus

Non-Final OA §112§Other
Filed
Sep 17, 2021
Examiner
ZAAB, SHARAH
Art Unit
2857
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Shimadzu Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
86 granted / 121 resolved
+3.1% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
156
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
§103
63.7%
+23.7% vs TC avg
§102
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§112
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 121 resolved cases

Office Action

§112 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 1/27/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-4 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation “delete data on at least one peak missing in any of the plurality of pieces of peak information from each of the plurality of pieces of peak information”. It is unclear how to delete data that is missing. For the purpose of a compact prosecution, Examiner has interpreted the limitation to have the broadest meaning. Allowable Subject Matter Regarding Claim 1, as best understood by the examiner the closest prior art Anderson, Ruderman, and Abe either singularly or in combination, fail to anticipate or render obvious an apparatus for food freshness detection, comprising: a chromatograph mass spectrometry apparatus that obtains a plurality of samples of food, and measures a plurality of pieces of peak information for the plurality of samples by applying gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS) to the plurality of samples and delete, when a coefficient of correlation of data between peaks among remaining peaks is equal to or larger than a prescribed value, data on one peak of the peaks from each of the plurality of pieces of peak information, in combination with all other limitations in the claim as claimed and defined by applicant. Examiner notes that claims 1-6 are not allowable in light of the rejection of the claims under 35 U.S.C. 112b. Response to Arguments 35 USC § 101 Applicant’s arguments, filed 1/27/2026, with respect to claims 1-4 and 6 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of claim 1 has been withdrawn. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHARAH ZAAB whose telephone number is (571)272-4973. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:00 am - 4:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Catherine Rastovski can be reached on 571-272-0349. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHARAH ZAAB/Examiner, Art Unit 2857 /Catherine T. Rastovski/Supervisory Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2863
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 17, 2021
Application Filed
Mar 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112, §Other
Jul 11, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 11, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 11, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 24, 2025
Final Rejection — §112, §Other
Dec 16, 2025
Interview Requested
Jan 13, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 21, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 27, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12583268
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING TIRE INFLATION PRESSURE LOSS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580137
Current Separation Method, Prediction Method, System and Like of Nonaqueous Lithium Power Storage Element
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571830
DETECTION OF ELECTRIC ARCS IN AN ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12566354
Measuring Method for Optical Nonlinearity of Two-Dimensional Material
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12560651
SHORT-CIRCUIT DETECTION DEVICE FOR ROTATING ELECTRIC MACHINE, AND SHORT-CIRCUIT DETECTION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+23.8%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 121 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month