Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/490,855

REMOTE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION MONITORING AND REPORTING

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Sep 30, 2021
Examiner
TRIEU, VAN THANH
Art Unit
2685
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Vapor Products Group LLC
OA Round
7 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
8-9
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
909 granted / 1076 resolved
+22.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1109
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
§103
44.6%
+4.6% vs TC avg
§102
36.7%
-3.3% vs TC avg
§112
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1076 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – Claims 21-27, 30-32, 35-43 and 45-50 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Desrochers et al [US 2006/0234621] Claim 21. (Currently Amended) A system for monitoring an air contaminant mitigation system that exhaust vapors from a contaminated area to an external environment (in some cases if the room may contain hazardous contaminants or for other reasons, it may be desirable to completely exhaust the airflow from the room to outside through the exhausted return air 1004 or exhaust air 1070 to the external environment, see Figs. 6, 9, para [0084, 0093]), the air contaminant mitigation system including an air conduit having a first end extending into a contaminated area (the outside air intake 62 or outside air input 1007 into the air duct 60 inside throughout the building or home, then the vacuum pump 140 pulls air from the sensing locations through the tubing/conduit 202 into the solenoids 161 through 167 and into a manifold 190 and to the one or more shared sensors 120 to measure temperature, CO2, different static pressure and/or air contaminants, radon, ozone, biological and/or chemical terrorist agents, see Figs. 1, 2, 6, para [0062, 0070, 0077, 0080]), and a second end exhausting into an external environment (the exhaust fans completely exhausting the room air or exhaust air through at other end of air duct 60 as shown by the arrow 1004, see Figs. 1, 2, 6, 9, para [0047, 0084, 0131]), the system for monitoring the air contaminant mitigation system comprising: a sensor module operably coupled to the air conduit, the sensor module including one or more sensors configured to monitor operational parameters of the air conduit (the one or more air sensors 120 to measure temperature, CO2, different static pressure and/or air contaminants, radon, ozone, biological and/or chemical terrorist agents, see Figs. 1, 2, 6, para [0070-0072, 0080]), and a communication circuit configured to wirelessly transmit sensor signals (the shared sensors 120 including a room sensor 25A, local duct sensors 1031, 1033, 1035 or 1037 may communicate wirelessly to the inputs block 150, see Figs. 1, 6, para [0071, 0072, 0097]); a sensor controller including a communication circuit configured to receive the sensor signals from the sensor module and transmit sensor data to a data server over a network (the signal processing controller 130 receives the data information from one or more shared sensors 120 and can send it through an internal and or external local area or wide area network for monitoring at a remote location. Additionally, the data can pass directly, or through a local area network, phone network or other suitable connecting means 171 to connect to the Internet or a dedicated network from which a website or other suitable means can be used to remotely access, display, and analyze the data from the multipoint air sampling system 100, see Fig. 1, para [0073]). Claim 22. (Previously Presented) The system of claim 21, wherein the one or more sensors includes a sensor configured to monitor the pressure in the air conduit (the shared sensors 120 sense of air pressures, see Fig. 1, para [0018, 0047, 0063]). Claim 23. (Previously Presented) The system of claim 22, wherein the one or more sensors includes another sensor configured to monitor an operational parameter of the air conduit other than the pressure in the air conduit (the shared sensors 120 also sense humidity, temperature, air contaminants, CO2, smoke, radon, ozone, biological and/or chemical terrorist agents, see Figs. 1, 2, 4, para [0070]). Claim 24. (Previously Presented) The system of claim 21, wherein the one or more sensors includes a sensor configured to monitor an electrical power status (the power monitoring, see para [0047, 0152]). Claim 25. (Previously Presented) The system of claim 21, wherein the one or more sensors includes a sensor configured to monitor pressure outside of the air conduit (the building control system or building management system controls one or more functions of the HVAC system in a building including monitoring indoor air, building pressurization and critical environments within a building or the ambient conditions surrounding, adjacent to a building or outside air duct sensor 65, see Figs. 1, 6, para [0020, 0044, 0047, 0071, 0095]). Claim 26. (Previously Presented) The system of claim 21, wherein the sensor controller is located remote from the sensor module ("...a signal processing controller as mentioned above refers to analog or digital electronic circuitry, and or a microprocessor or computer running a software or firmware program that uses at least information, signals and or software or firmware variables from either individual local sensors of air quality parameters plus virtual sensor signals, information and or software or firmware variables from remote or centralized sensors of air quality parameters, and blends, combines or processes this information in a potential multitude of ways", see Fig. 1, para [0046]). Claim 27. (Previously Presented) The system of claim 21, wherein the sensor controller is electrically connected to mains power (the building control system or building management system inherently requires a connection to an electrical source, such as an AC power outlet. As mentioned above, the control system is located in a building or facility that is used to control one or more functions of the HVAC system in a building such as for example control of space temperature, space relative humidity, air handling unit airflows and operation, exhaust fan flows, chiller operation, economizer operation, duct static pressures, building pressurization, and critical environment airflows. These systems often integrate with or incorporate other building systems or subsystems such as fire and security, card access, closed circuit TV monitoring, smoke control systems, power monitoring, see para [0047, 0152]). Claim 30. (Previously Presented) The system of claim 21, wherein the sensor data transmitted by the communication circuit of the sensor controller includes the sensor signals received by the communication circuit (the signal processing controller block 130 receives data from the shared sensors 120 through the wire or wireless communication devices such as IEEE 802.11, Zigbee, Bluetooth, mesh networking, etc. see Figs. 1, 2, abstract, para [0021, 0072, 0073]). Claim 31. (Previously Presented) The system of claim 21, wherein the sensor data transmitted by the communication circuit of the sensor controller is generated based on the sensor signals received by the communication circuit (as cited in respect to claims, 21 and 30 above, see Figs. 1, 2). Claim 32. (Previously Presented) The system of claim 21, wherein the system provides a notification of an alarm condition detected by the sensor module, the alarm condition occurring when the one or more sensors detect the operational parameter of the air conduit is outside a reference threshold (the alarms, see para [0019, 0021, 0115]). Claim 35. (Previously Presented) The system of claim 21, wherein the communication circuit of the sensor transmits the sensor signals via radio waves (as cited in respect to claim 30 above, the radio wave communication such as IEEE 802.11, Zigbee, Bluetooth, see para [0072]). Claim 36. (Previously Presented) The system of claim 35, wherein the radio waves are 900 Mhz (see para [0072]; the use of 900 Mhz radio waves by IEEE 802.11, Zigbee and/or Bluetooth is typical, as this frequency is well established in near-field communication). Claim 37. (Previously Presented) The system of claim 21, wherein the communication circuit of the sensor controller transmits the sensor data via WiFi (the sensors may communicate using such protocols and approaches as IEEE 802.11a/b/g (which is the technical standard for Wi-Fi), Zigbee, Bluetooth, mesh networking or other wireless methods used in the building and IT (Information Technology) industry, see Fig. 1, para [0072, 0073]). Claim 38. (Previously Presented) The system of claim 21, wherein the network used to transmit sensor data from the sensor controller to the data server is a cloud network (the data can be sent through an internal and or external local area or wide area network for monitoring at a remote location. Additionally, the data can pass directly, or through a local area network, phone network or other suitable connecting means 171 to connect to the Internet or a dedicated network from which a website or other suitable means can be used to remotely access, display, and analyze the data from the multipoint air sampling system 100, see Fig. 1, para [0073]). Claim 39. (Previously Presented) A method for monitoring operation of an air contaminant mitigation system including an air conduit having a first end extending into a contaminated area and a second end exhausting into an external environment, the method comprising: generating, by a sensor module operably coupled to the air conduit, sensor signals indicative of operational parameters of the air conduit (as cited in respect to claim 21 above); transmitting wirelessly, by the sensor module, the sensor signals to a sensor controller; generating, by the sensor controller, sensor data based on the sensor signals; and transmitting over a network the sensor data from the sensor controller to a data server (the wireless communication as cited in respect to claims 21 and 30 above). Claim 40. (Previously Presented) The method of claim 39, further comprising: generating, on the data server, operation data indicative of the operation of the air contaminant mitigation system based on the sensor data; and transmitting the operation data to remote devices (see Fig. 1, para [0073]). Claim 41. (Previously Presented) A system for monitoring an air contaminant mitigation system, the system comprising: a sensor module operably coupled to the air contaminant mitigation system, the sensor module including one or more sensors configured to monitor operational parameters of the air contaminant mitigation system, and a sensor controller including a communication circuit configured to receive the sensor signals from the sensor module and transmit sensor data to a data server over a network (as cited in respect to claim 21 above). Claim 42. (Previously Presented) The method of claim 39, further comprising: transmitting a signal from a remote computer to the sensor controller over the network, wherein, upon receiving the signal, a setting of the sensor controller is modified (the remote signal processing controller 350 and the modified sensor signals, see Fig. 4, para [0102]). Claim 43. (Previously Presented) The method of claim 42, wherein the setting is a timing of receiving the sensor signals from the sensor module (which reads upon the control logic block 510 to modify the sampling sequence on a potentially temporary basic during the period of a detected event of interest in a particular space 20 as a setting to receive of sensed signals, as to set of airflow cfm at any given time to assist of the multiple air sampling system, see Fig. 5, para [0088, 0109, 0110]). Claim 45. (Previously Presented) The method of claim 39, wherein the sensor controller is configured to control operation of the air contaminant mitigation system, the method further comprising: transmitting a signal from a remote computer to the sensor controller over the network, wherein, upon receiving the signal, the sensor controller modifies a parameter of the air contaminant mitigation system (as cited in respect to claims 21, 26 and 42 above, and including the signal processing controller block 130, 210, 530 or 1100 as a computer software or firmware program (see Figs. 1, 2, 4, 6, para [0100]). The computer 130, 210 transmits command signals 31A, 31B, 31C to each of the room airflow controller 30A, 30B, 30C using sensor information as particular air quality parameter sensor information from the shared sensors 220, see Figs. 1-3, para [0074, 0075, 0097]). Claim 46. (Previously Presented) The method of claim 45, wherein the parameter is a speed of a fan operably connected to the air conduit (the air speed in the conduit, duct or tube generated the airflow by exhaust fan flows such as the air fan 1002 and supply air fan 1011, see Figs. 1, 6, para [0018, 0030, 0047, 0084, 0092, 0095]). Claim 47. (Previously Presented) The method of claim 45, wherein the parameter is the power supplied to a fan operably connected to the air conduit (as cited in respect to claims 27 and 46 above, see para [0047,0152]). Claim 48. (Previously Presented) The method of claim 45, wherein the parameter is the opening or closing of control valves operably connected to the air conduit (the tubing 24A, 141 is controlled to opening or closing by the blade damper or by solenoid valves 161-167, 1161-1164 for controlling variable air volume, see Figs. 1, 6, para [0063, 0067- 0070, 0097]). Claim 49. (Previously Presented) The method of claim 45, wherein the parameter is an induced pressure in the air conduit (the airflow pressure, static pressure, differential pressure or absolute pressure, see para [0018, 0047, 0064, 0079, 0089]). Claim 50. (Previously Presented) The method of claim 39, further comprising transmitting the sensor data to a remote computer (the remote signal processing controller block 130, 210, 530 or 1100 as a computer software or firmware program (see Figs. 1, 2, 4, 6, para [0100]), wherein the remote computer 130, 210, 530 or 110 collects or receives of sensed data from the shared sensors 120, see Figs. 1, 2, abstract, claim 1, para [0073]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 28 and 29 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Desrochers et al [US 2006/0234621] in view of Ahmed [US 2004/0088082] Claim 28 (depends on claim 21). Desrochers et al fails to disclose wherein the data server records and stores the sensor data. However, Desrochers et al teaches that building control system or building management system or building control systems may have pneumatic, electric, electronic, microprocessor, computer, or web-based controls using pneumatic, analog and or digital signal inputs and outputs. These systems often have centralized monitoring functions, centralized or local control capabilities, and may have Internet or web-based access. They may also be referred to as building management systems (BMS), facility control systems (FCS), or facility management systems (FMS) (see para [0047]). Another use of the data can be to send it through an internal and or external local area or wide area network for monitoring at a remote location. Additionally, the data can pass directly, or through a local area network, phone network or other suitable connecting means 171 to connect to the Internet or a dedicated network from which a website or other suitable means can be used to remotely access, display, and analyze the data from the multipoint air sampling system 100 (see para [0073, 0081]). Ahmed suggests that the space control subsystem 114 of the building control system 100 of FIG. 1. The space control subsystem 114 of FIG. 6 is used in a space or room 610 that includes two fume hoods 612 and 614. A fume hood, as is known in the art, is a fume collection device disposed over an enclosed surface. The fume hoods 612 and 614 allow for experiments or processes that involve noxious gasses fumes by conducting those gasses away from the experimental area. The room 610 is coupled in an air communication relationship with an air flow supply duct 618 in which are disposed a supply damper 620 and a radiator or heating coil device 616. The room 610 is also coupled to communicate air to an exhaust duct 622 through a main exhaust damper 624. Fume hood dampers 626 and 628 communicate air/gas within the fume hoods 612 and 614, respectively, to the exhaust duct 622 (see Figs. 6-11, para [0093-0099, 0169]). The building control system 100 employs a first wireless communication scheme to effect communications between the supervisory computer 102, the chiller controller subsystem 106, the fan controller subsystem 108, and the room controller subsystems 110, 112 and 114. A wireless communication scheme identifies the specific protocols and RF frequency plan employed in wireless communications between sets of wireless devices. In the embodiment described herein, the first wireless communication scheme is implemented as a wireless area network. To this end, a wireless area network server 104 coupled to the supervisory computer 102 employs a packet-hopping wireless protocol to effect communication by and among the various subsystems of the building control system 100 (see Fig. 1, para [0033]). The space control subsystem 110 is further operable to obtain data regarding the general environment of the room for use, display or recording by a remote device, not shown in FIG. 2, of the building control system. (E.g., supervisory computer 102 of FIG. 1) (see Fig. 1, para [0038]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to implement the remote device wireless area network server for recording of building data information of Ahmed to the web-based controls using pneumatic, analog and or digital signal inputs and outputs of Desrochers et al for expanding application and use of the remote controller to receiving, recording and controlling of the building air contaminations effectively, since both references are in the field of endeavor of monitoring and sensing building and room fume and air flow exhaust system that may contaminated with CO, nitrogen and other gases. Claim 29. (Previously Presented) The system of claim 21, wherein remote devices can access the sensor data stored on the data server (taught by Desrochers et al in view of Ahmed as discussed with respect to claims 21 and 28 above). Claim 33 is rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable Desrochers et al [US 2006/0234621] in view of Hadziedic et al [US 2010/0102136] Claim 33 (depends on claim 21). Desrochers et al fails to disclose wherein the system provides a notification when an expected communication is not received from the sensor module. However, Desrochers et al teaches that the air sampling based refrigerant monitoring systems are examples of multipoint air sampling systems that provide alarm/limit functions are provided either locally where the shared sensor or sensors reside or via remote modules that are in communication with the sensor hardware via a digital network. In this way, multipoint air sampling systems have been used to provide a discontinuous signal, typically via a relay contact, which in turn provides a discontinuous control function based on a single air quality parameter. A discontinuous control function in the context of this patent is similarly defined as one with a limited set of output values or states such as two or three and similarly steps between these values with no intermediate values or states (see para [0019, 0021]). Hadziedic et al suggests that the HVAC system 100 may include one or more heat pumps in lieu of or in addition to the one or more furnaces 120, and one or more compressors 140. One or more humidifiers or dehumidifiers may be employed to increase or decrease humidity. One or more dampers may be used to modulate air flow through ducts (not shown). Air cleaners and lights may be used to reduce air pollution. Air quality sensors may be used to determine overall air quality (see Fig. 1, para [0028]). The premises HVAC system 100 with alarms may include one or more heat pumps in lieu of or in addition to the one or more furnaces 120, and one or more compressors 140. One or more humidifiers or dehumidifiers may be employed to increase or decrease humidity. One or more dampers may be used to modulate air flow through ducts (not shown). Air cleaners and lights may be used to reduce air pollution. Air quality sensors may be used to determine overall air quality (see Fig. 1, para [0028]. In an event 740, the AHC 210 and/or the IFC 220 broadcast on the data bus 180, an alarm signifying a failure of communication with the blower motor, in this case, e.g., Blowere Communication Failure. In an event 750, the AHC 210 or IFC 220 transmits a Device status message to the aSC 230a. The message may include an indication that a service, e.g., heating via the furnace 120, is unavailable (see Fig. 7, para [0100)). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify including the alarm indicating of failure communication with the air blower of HVAC system of Hadziedic et al for the multipoint air sampling system with alarm discontinuous control function of Desrochers et al for preventing of dangerous or casualty when the contaminants presented inside the building or house without alarm or notification to take action. Claim 34 is rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable Desrochers et al [US 2006/0234621] in view of Meynardi et al [US 2012/0109545] Claim 34 (depends on claim 21). Desrochers et al fails to disclose wherein the system provides a notification of a loss of electrical power to the sensor module. However, Desrochers et al teaches that the air sampling based refrigerant monitoring systems are examples of multipoint air sampling systems that provide alarm/limit functions are provided either locally where the shared sensor or sensors reside or via remote modules that are in communication with the sensor hardware via a digital network. In this way, multipoint air sampling systems have been used to provide a discontinuous signal, typically via a relay contact, which in turn provides a discontinuous control function based on a single air quality parameter (see para [0019, 0021]). These systems often integrate with or incorporate other building systems or subsystems such as fire and security, card access, closed circuit TV monitoring, smoke control systems, power monitoring, see para [0047, 0152]). Meynardi et al suggests that the systems and/or methods that provide for remote power outage and restoration notification using an outage and restoration notification application (hereinafter referred to as "O & R application") that enables an outage and/or restoration, associated with a customer premise, to be remotely detected, located, and/or reported to a power provider (see para [0010]). Based on a determination that the quantity of outages is greater than the outage threshold, the O&R application may send an outage event notification to O&RS 140 alerting a power provider that an outage event has been triggered. Based on determination that an outage event has been triggered, e.g., when the quantity of simultaneous outages is greater than the simultaneous threshold or when the quantity of co-located outages is greater than the co-located threshold, the O&R application may send the event outage notification (see Fig. 1, para [(0049]). The method comprising: receiving, by a server device and from a network terminal device installed at a customer premise, an alert that the network terminal device has lost primary power from a power grid (see claim 1). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to implement the alert of power outrage or losing power of Meynardi et al to the alert of lost power monitoring of Desrochers et al for notifying of errors or malfunctions of the system due to lost power or low power that may cause critical and lives when a house/premises is contaminated with a high concentration of methane or radon. Claim 44 is rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable Desrochers et al [US 2006/0234621] Claim 44 (depends on claim 42). Desrochers et al fails to disclose wherein the setting is a timing of transmitting the sensor data to the data server. However, Desrochers et al teaches that the control logic block 510 to modify the sampling sequence on a potentially temporary basic during the period of a detected event of interest in a particular space 20 as a setting to receive of sensed signals, as to set of airflow cfm at any given time such as 30 seconds to assist of the multiple air sampling system, see Fig. 5, para [0011, 0088, 0109, 0110]). The multipoint sampling unit 200 can also interface to and send data back and forth through data communications media 181 with the facility's building control or management system 180. This can be done directly or through one of many interface protocols such as BacNet, OPC, Lon by Echelon, XML or others (see Fig. 1, para [0081]). The sensed data information can be sent to building control system 180 for monitoring and or control purposes through a digital networked connection 181. The physical connection 181 could be an Ethernet connection, EIA485 (also known as RS485) connection or other type of digital data communications connection. Another use of the data can be to send it through an internal and or external local area LAN or wide area network WAN for monitoring at a remote location. Additionally, the data can pass directly, or through a local area network, phone network or other suitable connecting means 171 to connect to the Internet or a dedicated network from which a website or other suitable means can be used to remotely access, display, and analyze the data from the multipoint air sampling system 100 (see Fig. 1, para [0073]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to recognize that the system controller sets to sampling of sensed air at timing of 30 seconds then to transmitting the air sampling data to the remote Internet or website for analyzing and recording. Claim 51 is rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable Desrochers et al [US 2006/0234621] in view of Dawson et al [US 2009/0289787] Claim 51 (depends on claim 39). Desrochers et al fails to disclose transmitting the sensor data to a mobile device. However, Desrochers et al disclose the air sampling based refrigerant monitoring systems are examples of multipoint air sampling systems that provide alarm/limit functions such as this for individual parameters in which one or more relay contacts or analog output signals (such as 0-10 volt or 4-20 milliamp signals) are provided either locally where the shared sensor or sensors reside or via remote modules that are in communication with the sensor hardware via a digital network (see para [0021]). Another use of the data can be to send it through an internal and or external local area or wide area network for monitoring at a remote location. Additionally, the data can pass directly, or through a local area network, phone network or other suitable connecting means 171 to connect to the Internet or a dedicated network from which a website or other suitable means can be used to remotely access, display, and analyze the data from the multipoint air sampling system 100 (see para [0073]). Dawson et al suggests that the examples of triggers in triggers contained in triggers 604 include, without limitation, fire alarm activation, smoke detector activation, 911 call placed, medical alert device activation, power outage detection, door bell activation, carbon monoxide threshold, noise threshold, out of town alert, motion detection, gas detection, infrared detection, weight sensors within property activation, light detection, pet detection, poisonous chemical detection, and flood detection (see Figs. 4, 6, para [0053, 0066]). The computer implemented method, apparatus, and computer program product for security cluster monitoring and notification. A security cluster comprised of a plurality of structures is monitored for a plurality of events (see abstract). The event triggers table 600 of event trigger table 411 with cluster alert system 402. The event triggers in triggers contained in triggers 604 include, without limitation, carbon monoxide threshold, noise threshold, and poisonous chemical detection (see Figs. 4, 6, para [0053]). Portable device 312 is a pervasive portable device that receives information from a cluster alert system. The portable device 312 includes without limitation, mobile telephones, PDAs, smart watches, personal computers, and laptops. Security cluster 300 allows for bi-directional communication between cluster alert systems and portable device 312 (see Fig. 2, para [0044, 0045]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to substitute the portable devices such as PDA, PC and/or laptop of Dawson et al for the transmitting of the contaminated data information to remote phone network or website of Desrochers et al for quickly accessed by an owner or person or police to preventing of casualty due to dangerous contaminations. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on 11/17/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Because, Applicant’s arguments: (A) Nothing in Desrochers contemplates exhausting air contaminants from a contaminated area for air mitigation purposes. Certainly, no HVAC system would intentionally place an intake for an air conduit into a known contaminated area. Claim 21 has presently been amended to clarify that the system of the present invention is "for monitoring an air contaminant mitigation system that exhausts vapors from a contaminated area to an external environment, the air contaminant mitigation system including an air conduit having a first end extending into the contaminated area and a second end exhausting into the external environment. (B) As claims 22-38 depend from independent claim 21, dependent claims 22-38 are allowable for at least the reasons provided in support of the allowability of independent claim 21. In particular, Applicant notes that none of the other cited references of Ahmed, Hadziedic, Meynardi, and Dawson are directed to air contaminant mitigation systems. (C) Independent claim 39 is a method claim but has been amended similarly as independent claim 21. Applicant therefore respectfully traverses the rejection of claim 39 for at least the reasons provided above with respect to independent claim 21. As claims 40 and 42-51 depend from independent claim 39, dependent claims 40 and 42-51 are allowable for at least the reasons provided in support of the allowability of independent claim 39. Response to the arguments: (A) Desrochers teaches that additionally, in some cases if the room may contain hazardous contaminants or for other reasons, it may be desirable to completely exhaust the airflow from the room to outside via the exhausted return air 1004 or exhaust air 1007 to the external environment, as shown in Figures. 6 and 9, para [0084]), as cited in respect to claim 21 above. (B) Dependent claims 22-38 are depending on the rejected dependent claim 21 and is/are obvious to one skill in the art to combine with second references such as Ahmed, Hadziedic, Meynardi, and Dawson teaching of building or home controlling system related to detecting and monitoring of air flow, air pollution, gases, carbon, CO, dioxide, methane, radon and/or contaminated air event. The detected data and event are wire/wirelessly communicate with remote station or unit (as discussed in the rejections above). (C) The claims 39-51 are obvious rejected by single reference of Desrochers including a plurality of sensors positioned throughout the home/building or rooms, and/or by combination with any references as being rejected as above and indicated in section (B) above. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Meneely Jr. discloses the fresh air ventilation system in a building having an outside wall exhausts contaminants, such as stale or noxious air, through the outside wall and takes in fresh air. A remote switch sets a mode of operation of the ventilation system. One or more strategically placed air quality sensors are located within the building. The sensors may be connected wirelessly through a multiplexor interconnect system to operational control the fan of the exhaust system. In response to the detection of a contaminant above a pre-selected level by a sensor, the relay controller for the sensors resets the remote switch for continuous high-speed operation to evacuate or to exhaust the contaminants from the building through either special ducts or the conventional air ventilation ducts within the building. [US 2010/0105311] THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from examiner should be directed to primary examiner craft is Van Trieu whose telephone number is (571) 2722972. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri from 8:00 AM to 3:00 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Mr. Wang Quan-Zhen can be reached on (571) 272-3114. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair- direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786- 9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VAN T TRIEU/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2685 01/05/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 30, 2021
Application Filed
Sep 07, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 13, 2023
Response Filed
May 04, 2023
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Nov 09, 2023
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 15, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 04, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jun 10, 2024
Response Filed
Jul 01, 2024
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jan 06, 2025
Notice of Allowance
Jan 06, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 22, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jul 02, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 02, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Nov 04, 2025
Interview Requested
Nov 12, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 12, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 17, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 05, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599342
PATIENT REQUEST SYSTEM HAVING PATIENT FALLS RISK NOTIFICATION AND CAREGIVER NOTES ACCESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599522
PATIENT SUPPORT APPARATUSES WITH WIRELESS HEADWALL COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600320
VEHICLE ANTI-THEFT DEVICE AND METHOD THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598449
SYNCHRONIZATION BETWEEN DEVICES IN EMERGENCY VEHICLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590772
Method and System for Sensing, Monitoring, Logging and Transmitting Events That Is Assembled on a Firearm
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

8-9
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+13.0%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1076 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month