Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/496,562

METHODS FOR MANAGING THE TRANSITION FROM SLEEP TO FINAL WAKE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 07, 2021
Examiner
BARAKAT, MOHAMED
Art Unit
2689
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Consumer Sleep Solutions LLC
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
612 granted / 830 resolved
+11.7% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
857
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
49.7%
+9.7% vs TC avg
§102
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§112
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 830 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed 10/28/2025 has been entered. Claim 1 has been amended, claims 9-10 were canceled and no new claims were added. Therefore, claims 1-6 are currently pending for examination. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 3. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. 4. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The examiner failed to find any support for limitation “wherein the activation of the one or more selected stimuli is further conditioned on detection, via the microphone, of a transient external sound event originating outside the sleep environment that has propagated into the sleep environment at or before the scheduled time” in claim 1 in the original disclosure. Therefore, limitation “wherein the activation of the one or more selected stimuli is further conditioned on detection, via the microphone, of a transient external sound event originating outside the sleep environment that has propagated into the sleep environment at or before the scheduled time” is considered to be new matter. Claims 2-6 depend on claim 1. Claims 2-6 are also rejected because they depend on a base claim that is rejected. Response to Remarks 5. The Applicant's remarks regarding the rejection have been considered but are moot because the arguments do not apply to the new ground of rejection. Conclusion 6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOHAMED BARAKAT whose telephone number is (571)270-3696. The examiner can normally be reached on 9:00am-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Davetta Goins can be reached on (571) 272-2957. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MOHAMED BARAKAT/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2689
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 07, 2021
Application Filed
Aug 02, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Feb 08, 2024
Response Filed
Feb 15, 2024
Final Rejection — §112
Aug 22, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 27, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 06, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Apr 10, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 23, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Oct 28, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 06, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600299
VEHICLE DRIVE ASSIST APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589764
VEHICLE OPERATOR SLEEP CONDITION REMEDIATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589693
VEHICULAR LAMP, CONTROL DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD FOR VEHICULAR LAMP, VEHICULAR LAMP SYSTEM, AND CONFIGURATING DEVICE AND CONFIGURATING METHOD FOR VEHICULAR LAMP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586459
ILLUMINATING A ROAD CROSSING TO INDICATE A SAFE CROSSING CONDITION FOR A USER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582352
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRANSDERMAL ALCOHOL MONITORING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+23.5%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 830 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month