Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 17/501,140

NANO-CERAMIC COATING MAGNIFIED DENTAL MIRROR

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Oct 14, 2021
Examiner
TO, HOLLY T
Art Unit
3772
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
OA Round
5 (Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
6-7
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allow Rate
54 granted / 109 resolved
-20.5% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+33.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
143
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
49.3%
+9.3% vs TC avg
§102
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
§112
26.7%
-13.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 109 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/11/2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-2, 4, 7, 10-11, 13-14, 16 and 18-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 1 recites “a first button configured to control rotation of the mirror head through a stepper motor operably connected to the straight shaft at the end of the straight handle and a worm drive by which the stepper motor is connected to the straight shaft; wherein the first button includes a slot and a slider disposed in the slot, and the slider is mechanically connected to the double-sided mirror via the straight shaft to rotate the double-sided mirror about the central axis, as the slider moves in the slot that extends along a portion of a circumference of the straight handle” in lines 14-20. It is found that applicant fails to describe a dental mirror comprising a first button that would rotate the mirror through a stepper motor AND through a slider/slot mechanism. It is found that applicant has support for manually moving the mirror through the slider/slot in an embodiment as shown in Fig. 5a-5b and disclosed on Pg. 19. Further, applicant has support in a different embodiment which shows the mirror being rotated through a stepper motor by pressing the first button as shown in Fig. 1-2 and disclosed on Pgs. 13-14. Applicant does not have support of the dental mirror having a combination of both mirror rotating means. Claims 2, 4, 7, 10-11, 13-14, 16 and 18-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph for being dependent off of claim 1. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-2, 4, 7, 10-11, 13-14, 16 and 18-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “a first button configured to control rotation of the mirror head through a stepper motor operably connected to the straight shaft at the end of the straight handle and a worm drive by which the stepper motor is connected to the straight shaft; wherein the first button includes a slot and a slider disposed in the slot, and the slider is mechanically connected to the double-sided mirror via the straight shaft to rotate the double-sided mirror about the central axis, as the slider moves in the slot that extends along a portion of a circumference of the straight handle” in lines 14-20. It is unclear as to how the first button is configured to control rotation of the mirror through a stepper motor operably connected to the straight shaft while also having the slider part of the first button being mechanically connected to the mirror through the straight shaft. Claims 2, 4, 7, 10-11, 13-14, 16 and 18-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph for being dependent off of claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Xiang (CN 111407219 A) is found to be the closest prior art which discloses a dental mirror comprising a handle, a mirror head, a shaft, a stepper motor, a rotational joint between the mirror head and shaft, and a first button to rotate the shaft/mirror head. However, Xiang is silent to: “a first button configured to control rotation of the mirror head through a stepper motor operably connected to the straight shaft at the end of the straight handle and a worm drive by which the stepper motor is connected to the straight shaft; wherein the first button includes a slot and a slider disposed in the slot, and the slider is mechanically connected to the double-sided mirror via the straight shaft to rotate the double-sided mirror about the central axis, as the slider moves in the slot that extends along a portion of a circumference of the straight handle” and “wherein the masses of the mirror head and the base are balanced so that the dental mirror has a center of gravity which is closer to the base than the mirror head” in combination with the rest of the claim limitations. It should be noted that Wang (CN 117100206 A) discloses a mirror that can rotate the mirror head by rotating a slider (9, denoted as a ring) found to be fitted into a slot (10, denoted as a groove) found to extend the circumference of the handle as shown in Fig. 2. Wang however does not disclose a first button configured to control rotation of the mirror head through a stepper motor operably connected to the straight shaft at the end of the straight handle AND the slider is mechanically connected to the double-sided mirror via the straight shaft. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOLLY T TO whose telephone number is (571)272-0719. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 6:30 - 4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eric Rosen can be reached at (571)-270-7855. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HOLLY T. TO/Examiner, Art Unit 3772 /HEIDI M EIDE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3772 1/2/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 14, 2021
Application Filed
Aug 15, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Nov 29, 2024
Response Filed
Feb 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Apr 16, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 16, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 29, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 22, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Dec 11, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Mar 03, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 04, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 25, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 08, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12575913
Bioactive Intraosseous Dental Implant
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575658
APPLICATOR WITH IN-LINE SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12557896
COSMETIC APPLICATOR WITH FLEXIBLE APPLICATOR TIP
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12521208
ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE WITH NON-SLIDING, TIED ARCHWIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12522415
COSMETIC CONTAINERS, IN PARTICULAR A MASCARA CONTAINER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

6-7
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+33.4%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 109 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month