Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/502,301

WIRELESS CONTROL MOUNT

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Oct 15, 2021
Examiner
GARFT, CHRISTOPHER
Art Unit
3632
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Sram LLC
OA Round
8 (Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
9-10
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allow Rate
818 granted / 1392 resolved
+6.8% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
73 currently pending
Career history
1465
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
46.5%
+6.5% vs TC avg
§102
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
§112
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1392 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Amendment filed 11/13/2025 has been entered. Claims 1, 3, 5, and 18-23 remain pending in the present application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1, 3, 5, and 18-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Miki US 9073595 (hereinafter Miki). PNG media_image1.png 692 821 media_image1.png Greyscale Re. Cl. 1, Miki discloses: A mount (16, Fig. 2) for a control device for a bicycle (see Fig. 2, capable of being used with a control device in the same manner as 12/38), the mount comprising: a securing portion (20, 22a Fig. 2) having a first portion (20, Fig. 2) and a second portion (22a, Fig. 2), the first portion configured to be disposable entirely around an outer surface of a handlebar of the bicycle (see Fig. 2), the second portion extending away from the first portion (see Fig. 1-3, laterally away from 20 along axis X so that 36 is spaced from 20) and configured to extend along the length of the handlebar and in contact with the handlebar (see Fig. 1-3), the second portion of the securing portion having an outer surface (see Fig. 2-3); a housing portion (36, Fig. 2) integrally formed with the second portion of the securing portion (see Fig. 2-3, 36 and 22a are integrally secured), and protruding from outer surface of the second portion of the securing portion (see Fig. 2); and a cavity (36c, Fig. 5) within at least the housing portion (see Fig. 5), wherein the housing portion comprises a shoulder (36b, Fig. 5) that defines an opening through the housing portion to the cavity (see 36a, Fig. 5), the housing protruding from the outer surface of the second portion of the securing portion such that the opening is located at a distance from the outer surface of the second portion of the securing portion (see Fig. 2-3 and 5), and wherein a size of the opening is smaller than a size of the cavity (see Fig. 5); and wherein the entirety of the housing portion is configured to extend along a length of the handlebar (see Fig. 2) such that the control device is positioned at least partially between the handlebar and the shoulder of the housing (see Fig. 2, the control device is capable of being positioned as claimed in the same manner as 38). Re. Cl. 3, Miki discloses: the securing portion comprises a first fastener receiving portion and a second fastener receiving portion opposite the first fastener receiving portion (see Fig. 2, where 21 passes through). Re. Cl. 5, Miki discloses: the securing portion and the housing portion are different portions of a single part (see Fig. 2, 22a and 36 are part of a single part). Re. Cl. 18, Miki discloses: A mount (16, Fig. 2) for a control device for a bicycle (see Fig. 2, capable of being used with a control device in the same manner as 12/38), the mount comprising: a securing portion (20, 22a Fig. 2) configured to be disposable around an outer surface of a handlebar of the bicycle (see Fig. 1), and the securing portion having a first end (20, Fig. 2) and a second end (end with 22a, Fig. 2), the first end of the securing portion configured to extend around the handlebar to a greater extent than the second end (see Fig. 1); a housing portion (36, Fig. 2) integrally formed with the securing portion (see Fig. 2, 36 is integrally secured to 22a), and protruding from the securing portion (see Fig. 1-2), the control device configured to be removable from the housing portion and securing portion of the mount (see Fig. 2, via 40 and 38); a cavity (36c, Fig. 5) within at least the housing portion fitted to the shape of the control device (see Fig. 2, the housing 36 is shaped so that it can be fitted to a control device in the same manner as 38); and an opening (36a, Fig. 5) through the housing portion to the cavity (see Fig. 5); wherein the control device is configured to be positioned fully within the cavity of the housing portion (see Fig. 2, the cavity of the housing 36 is configured to have a control device positioned fully therein in the same manner as 38). Re. Cl. 19, Miki discloses: a shoulder (36b, Fig. 5) extending from the housing portion and defining the opening through the housing portion to the cavity (see Fig. 5). Re. Cl. 20, Miki discloses: a first fastener receiving portion extending from the securing portion; and a second fastener receiving portion extending from the securing portion (see Fig. 2, opposing ends of 20 where 21 passes), wherein the second fastener receiving portion is disposed opposite the first fastener receiving portion with respect to a central axis of the securing portion (see Fig. 2). Re. Cl. 21, Miki discloses: the securing portion (22a) includes a fastener receiving portion (see annotated figure 2) having an opening (see annotated figure 2) sized and shaped to receive a fastener (21, Fig. 2), and the fastener receiving portion and the housing portion are formed as a single piece (see Fig. 2, the annotated fastener receiving portion and housing 36 are formed as a single piece as shown). Re. Cl. 22, Miki discloses: the first end of the securing portion includes a fastener receiving portion having an opening sized and shaped to receive a fastener (see Fig. 2, openings which receive fastener 21). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 23 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Miki. Re. Cl. 23, Miki discloses a size of the opening is smaller than a size of the cavity (see Fig. 2), and the opening having a length greater than its width (see Fig. 2, the length of the opening extending in a direction akin to D2 is greater than the width extending along D1), however the length of the opening extends transverse to the length of the handlebar. Miki does however disclose an additional opening (26a) which aligns with the opening in the housing portion (see Fig. 1-2) so that the device (12) can be adjusted in two dimensions relative to the handlebar. As can be seen in Fig. 1-2 and 5, the opening (26a) has a length and a width, with the length being greater than the width and when assembled, the length of the opening is configured to extend along a length of the handlebar (see Fig. 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to switch the openings (26a) and (36a) in Miki so that the opening in housing portion (36) extends along the length of the handlebar since it has been held that a mere reversal of the essential working parts of a device involves only routine skill in the art. In re Einstein, 8 USPQ 167. Please note that in the instant application, Applicant has not disclosed any criticality for the claimed limitations. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1, 3, 5 and 21 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Re. Applicant’s argument that Miki does not disclose the limitation “a cavity within at least the housing portion fitted to the shape of the control device… wherein the control device is configured to be positioned fully within the cavity of the housing portion” as required by claim 18, the Examiner disagrees. . Applicant’s invention is directed towards a mount intended to be used with a control device not a combination of a mount and the control device. Therefore, the limitations referring to the control device is an intended use recitation which merely requires the capability of being used in that manner. The Examiner maintains that Miki is capable of being used as discussed above in the rejection of claim 18. Specifically, the housing portion is formed as claimed and is configured to support a control device therein in the same manner as it supports (38). Applicant’s arguments appear to be based on the assumption that a specific control device is required by the claims which is not the case in the Examiner’s position. Since Applicant’s argument are not commensurate in scope with the current claim language, the argument has been considered but is not persuasive. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Takeuchi US 2014/0026710, Kosaka US 2014/0137696, Cesur US 7841258, and Tiong US 2006/0053954 disclose other known mounts for handlebars which are presented to the Applicant for their consideration. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER E GARFT whose telephone number is (571)270-1171. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Terrell McKinnon can be reached at (571)272-4797. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER GARFT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3632
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 15, 2021
Application Filed
Oct 11, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jan 08, 2024
Response Filed
Jan 16, 2024
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 15, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 16, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
May 21, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Aug 16, 2024
Response Filed
Aug 23, 2024
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Nov 21, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 23, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 05, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 06, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 13, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jun 16, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Nov 13, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 02, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601446
BRAKING SYSTEM FOR HOLDING A SCREEN
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599189
HELMET CAMERA SYSTEM, FASTENING DEVICE, HELMET SYSTEM, AND CAMERA SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590667
HEIGHT ADJUSTABLE HOLDER FOR A MULTIPLATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12573981
TRESTLE BASE AND TRESTLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565985
LIGHT HOOK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

9-10
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+22.8%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1392 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month