Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 17/507,961

ROAD PLATE MOVING SYSTEM AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 22, 2021
Priority
Sep 13, 2021 — CA 3130501
Examiner
ADDIE, RAYMOND W
Art Unit
3671
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Fer-Pal Construction Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
1286 granted / 1581 resolved
+29.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1611
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
49.7%
+9.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§112
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1581 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 16-19, 22-24, 26, 27, 30-33 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Golding US 4,826,388 in view of Robinette US 5,211,526. Golding teaches manhole lifting device (10) comprising: A frame (96) configured to position; A pair of detachable lifting devices (42) including a bar (64A, 64b) over a manhole cover. See Figs. 11-12. At least two wheels (28, 30) mounted to the frame (96) and configured to roll in a desired direction. A pair of lifting mechanisms (80), such as crank or hydraulic jacks (98) mounted to said wheels (30) and configured to raise and lower the frame. Fig. 12. A detachable handle (14). What Golding does not disclose is attaching the manhole lifter to a vehicle. However, Robinette teaches a mobile crane (10) comprising: A frame (52, 36) configured to straddle a road plate or manhole cover. See Fig. 1. A 1st detachable lifting device (24) configured to be positioned via the frame over a road plate or manhole cover. Col. 3, lns. 35-52. Fig. 2. A detachable attachment mechanism (50, 54) connecting the mobile crane to a vehicle. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the manhole lifter of Golding with a vehicle hitch, as taught by Robinette in order to facilitate moving the device from one manhole cover to the next. With respect to claims 17-19 Golding discloses a 1st road plate attachment mechanism (42) and a 2nd road plate attachment mechanism (42) mounted on arms (64A, 64B). Such that the attachment mechanisms (42) What Golding does not disclose is attaching the manhole lifter to a vehicle. However, Robinette teaches a mobile crane (10) comprising: A detachable attachment mechanism (50, 54) connecting the mobile crane to a vehicle. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the manhole lifter of Golding with a vehicle hitch, as taught by Robinette in order to facilitate moving the device from one manhole cover to the next. Claim(s) 20, 21, 25, 28, 29, 34, 35 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Golding US 4,826,388 in view of Robinette US 5,211,526 as applied to claim 19 above, and further in view of Bigham US 2021/0206613. Golding in view of Robinette disclose a manhole lifter having a pair of manhole attachment devices (42) and a detachable vehicle attachment device. What Golding in view of Robinette do not disclose is the use of a magnet. However, Bigham teaches it is known to use a magnet to lift and move manhole covers, street or sidewalk grates or any metal structure positioned over an opening in a ground surface. [0008, 24, 0037]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the manhole lifter of Golding in view of Robinette with a magnet as taught by Bigham in order to facilitate attachment & lifting of a variety of metallic road structures. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 7/13/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s Rep. argues the prior art does not teach a road plate weight more than 741kg. However, the limitation is irrelevant to the disclosed invention which is directed to a “portable system configured to move a road plate using a vehicle”. Hence, the limitation does not further limit the claimed invention since the “portable system configured to move a road plate” does not include the road plate itself, rather the portable system includes structural features for attaching and lifting a road plate. Therefore the argument is not persuasive and the rejection is maintained. Conclusion 7. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAYMOND W ADDIE whose telephone number is (571)272-6986. The examiner can normally be reached on m-f 7:30-12:30, then 6-9pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chris Sebesta can be reached on 571-272-0547. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAYMOND W ADDIE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3671 8/4/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 22, 2021
Application Filed
Dec 05, 2024
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 05, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 13, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703954
EXTENSION PIPE FOR MANHOLE COVER
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12703951
VEHICLE BARRIER SYSTEM AND METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION THEREOF
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12692673
PLATE COMPACTOR
5y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692675
SHOCK-ABSORBING CAR SAFETY STOPPER
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692670
ROADWAY EXPANSION JOINT DEVICE COMPRISING A ROD SUPPORTING A FLEXIBLE ELEMENT PLACED BETWEEN TWO JOINT PROFILES
1y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+8.2%)
1y 12m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1581 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month