Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 17/508,597

PORTABLE CHARGING SYSTEM WITH NETWORK CAPABILITIES

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 22, 2021
Priority
Oct 23, 2020 — provisional 63/104,767
Examiner
KOUSAR, SADIA
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Hubbell Incorporated
OA Round
10 (Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
11-12
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
79 granted / 121 resolved
-2.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
163
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§103
57.7%
+17.7% vs TC avg
§102
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
§112
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 121 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 05/26/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant argues on page 8, “the battery assembly 100 does not provide network connectivity to the dashboard 240 in order to provide internet access to the external device, and simply "communicating" with a device is not equivalent to "providing network connectivity to the external device in order to provide internet access to the external device".” The examiner respectfully disagrees. Harvey discloses battery assembly 100 having cellular communication capabilities, a mobile gateway 330) to communicate via the network 308, where the network 308 includes the Internet. (paragraph [0057]). The battery assembly 100 is connected to the internet network 308 and provides the internet access to the external device 312 through it (fig. 12). The applicant further argues that “supplying power to the external load device and providing network connectivity to the external device." Rather, the external load and the mobile device of Harvey are two different devices and the portable device of Harvey never "provid[es] network connectivity" to either device in order to provide internet access. The examiner respectfully disagrees. The battery 100 not only provides power to the equipment 302 but also connects to the power equipment through the network 308 (fig. 12). For example, 100’ is connected to network 308 (type of router) (fig. 12) and the 302 is also connected to 308 (internet network) through the gateway 306 (fig. 12). Thus, 100’ is also capable of providing power to power equipment 302, and they both provide internet connectivity to each other through the network 308 (fig. 12, paragraph [0053]). The applicant arguments are not persuasive. Therefore, This Action Is Made Final. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-7, 9, 13-18,21-22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Harvey et al. (US 2022/0314819), herein after Harvey and Bonilla (US 2018/0375349). Regarding claim 1, Harvey discloses a portable charging system with network capabilities (fig. 12), the system comprising: a portable device (100, figs. 12 & 17) including a rechargeable battery (105 is the part of battery assembly 100, fig. 1, 18 204 is the battery cells in the battery pack 105, paragraph [0036]) configured to supply a type of power to at least one external load device via a power output , wherein the type of power is configured to charge the external load device (the battery pack 105 includes a connector 219 to electrically couple the battery pack 105 (and battery assembly 100) to external devices, paragraph [0036]), and a portable device transceiver (214, fig. 17) configured to provide network connectivity to an external device to form a mesh network with at least one other portable device and without connecting to a central access point (the transceiver 214 is capable of connecting with the battery assembly 100 (transceiver without connecting to the central access point, fig. 17; The battery assembly 100 can then communicate wirelessly with multiple other devices, including power equipment, chargers, one or more battery assemblies 100, and/or cellular devices in a mesh network, paragraph [0053])), wherein the power output is isolated from the portable device transceiver (the electrical connector 219 and transceiver 214 is isolated, fig. 18) in order to prevent unapproved access to the network (The NFC tag reader (form of transceiver on the battery assembly 100) 199 can communicate with the battery management circuit 200, which will prevent (e.g., block) or restrict electricity transmission between the battery assembly 100 and the piece of unauthorized or damaged equipment, regardless of whether an adequate electrical connection is formed between the connector 219 and the equipment interface 192, paragraph [0045]), and a single housing (100, fig. 1) containing the rechargeable battery (battery pack 105, fig. 1), the power output (the electrical connector 219, fig. 18), and the portable device transceiver (214, fig. 17Note: fig. 1, 12, 17-18 is the part of single embodiment; where 1, 17-18 is the main embodiment and fig. 12 is an example). Harvey further discloses the portable device is configured to operate in: a mode wherein the portable device is providing network connectivity to the external device in order to provide internet access to the external device and is not supplying power to the external device (the portable device 100’ is only provide network connectivity to the external devices 312 through 308, fig. 12), another mode wherein the portable device is supplying power to the external load device and providing network connectivity to the external device in order to provide internet access to the external device, and wherein the external load device and the external device are the same device (the battery assembly 100 includes a communication gateway 202. In some arrangements, the communication gateway 202 includes the hardware and logic necessary to communicate over multiple channels of data communication. For example, the communication gateway 202 may include a Wi-Fi interface, a cellular modem, a Bluetooth transceiver, a Bluetooth beacon, an RFID transceiver, an NFC transceiver, or a combination thereof. The communication gateway 202 facilitates data communication to and from the battery assembly 100 (and therefore the equipment 302 on which the battery assembly 100 is used) paragraph [0053]; shows that the battery 100 not only provide power to external device but also have the gateway to connect them through internet), and other mode wherein the portable device is supplying power to the external load device and providing network connectivity to the external device in order to provide internet access to the external device, and wherein the external load device and the external device are separate devices (the battery 100 is providing power to the load device 302 and they are connected to the external device 312 through the internet network 308, fig. 13, paragraph [0057]). However, Harvey is silent about the an operating mode wherein the portable device is supplying power to the external load device and is not providing network connectivity. Bonilla discloses an operating mode wherein the portable device is supplying power to the external load device and is not providing network connectivity (in fig. 4B the portable device 100 provide the power to 115 by connecting the devices together and does not provide any communication connectivity, paragraph [0043], [0044]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of claimed invention to modify Harvey in view of Bonilla to provide the power to load without any commination network, in order to increase the simplicity, reliability, and reduced cost due to fewer components and less complexity. Regarding claim 2, Harvey further discloses the system further comprising a second portable device including a second rechargeable battery configured to supply a type of power to at least a second load device, and a second portable device transceiver configured to provide network connectivity to a second external device (the device 100 is capable of connecting with the other similar portable device 100 having the same components as described above, 105 battery pack, load devices 302, 312, transceiver 214, fig.12, 17). Regarding claim 3, Harvey further discloses wherein at least one selected from a group consisting of the portable device and the second portable device acts as a network coordinator (fig. 12, paragraph [0055]). Regarding claim 4, Harvey further discloses wherein the portable device transceiver and the second portable device transceiver uses a communication protocol (The battery assembly 100″ can communicate over three different communication protocols (e.g., NFC, Bluetooth, and Wi-Fi) simultaneously using one or more transceivers 214, paragraph [0060]). Regarding claim 5, Harvey further discloses wherein the communication protocol is at least one selected from a group consisting of WiFi, BLE, Bluetooth, Bluetooth Mesh, Bluetooth 5, Thread, Z-Wave, USB, Serial, LoRaWAN, and Zigbee (paragraph [0060]). Regarding claim 6, Harvey further discloses the system further comprising a central transceiver (the battery assembly 100 is capable of coupling to and communicating with other battery assemblies 100, various types of charging systems or stations 304, or other types of gateways/IoT gateways (e.g., gateway 306, vehicle gateway 330), etc. (e.g., via Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or other data communication systems) over a mesh network, paragraph [0055] where 304 is the central station and have transceiver to communicate with other devices, fig. 12). Regarding claim 7, Harvey further discloses wherein the central transceiver, the portable device transceiver, and the second portable device transceiver form the network (every portable device 100 is connected with each other and with the central charging station 304, fig. 12, paragraph [0055]). Regarding claim 9, Harvey further discloses wherein the portable device further includes a power source configured to charge the rechargeable battery (The fast charger 250 is configured to couple to the battery assembly 100 and charge the battery assembly 100, paragraph [0049]). Regarding claim 13, Harvey further discloses the system further comprising a central station including a central transceiver configured to provide communication, via the portable device, to the external device (each of the battery assemblies 100 are configured to communicate with other battery assemblies 100 in addition to equipment (e.g., charging stations 304, power equipment 302) and/or gateways 306 and network 308 connected devices, paragraph [0056]), and an output port configured to supply power to the portable device when the portable device is coupled to the central station (the battery pack 105 includes a connector 219 to electrically couple the battery pack 105 (and battery assembly 100) to external devices (e.g., different power equipment 302, chargers 304, etc.), paragraph [0036]). Regarding claim 14, Harvey discloses the system of claim 13. However, Harvey is silent about wherein the central station further includes an electronic processor configured to define a virtual boundary in which the portable device is expected to stay in; determine a location of the portable device; determine, based the location of the portable device, whether the portable device is within the virtual boundary; and transmit a command to the portable device causing the portable device to perform at least one selected from a group consisting of: (1) stop supplying power to the load device and (2) stop providing communication to the external device, when the battery is not within the virtual boundary. Bonilla discloses wherein the central station further includes an electronic processor (electronic processor 202, fig. 2A) configured to define a virtual boundary (virtual boundary 400, fig 4A) in which the portable device is expected to stay in; determine a location of the portable device; determine, based the location of the portable device, whether the portable device is within the virtual boundary; and transmit a command to the portable device causing the portable device to perform at least one selected from a group consisting of: (1) stop supplying power to the load device (claim 1) and (2) stop providing communication to the external device, when the battery is not within the virtual boundary (When the user takes the battery module 110 outside the single room, leaving the predetermined charging range, the battery module 110 no longer receives a wireless charge from the central charging station 105; paragraph [0044)). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of claimed invention to modify Harvey’s system to include the virtual boundary in the system as taught by Bonilla, in order to enhanced security, convenience, and efficiency of the wireless charging system. Regarding claim 15, Harvey discloses a method of operating a portable device (fig. 12), the method comprising: supplying a type of power (paragraph [0002]), via a rechargeable battery (The battery assembly 100 includes a battery pack 105, paragraph [0031]) and a power output (electrical connector 219, fig. 18); to at least one external load device, wherein the type of power is configured to charge the external load device (the battery pack 105 includes a connector 219 to electrically couple the battery pack 105 (and battery assembly 100) to external devices (e.g., different power equipment 302, chargers 304, etc.), paragraph [0036]); providing network connectivity, via a portable device transceiver, to an external device to form a mesh network with at least one other portable device and without connecting to a central access point (the transceiver 214 is capable of connecting with the battery assembly 100 (transceiver without connecting to the central access point, fig. 17; The battery assembly 100 can then communicate wirelessly with multiple other devices, including power equipment, chargers, one or more battery assemblies 100, and/or cellular devices in a mesh network, paragraph [0053]), wherein the power output is isolated from the portable device transceiver in order to prevent unapproved access to the network (The NFC tag reader (form of transceiver on the battery assembly 100) 199 can communicate with the battery management circuit 200, which will prevent (e.g., block) or restrict electricity transmission between the battery assembly 100 and the piece of unauthorized or damaged equipment, regardless of whether an adequate electrical connection is formed between the connector 219 and the equipment interface 192, paragraph [0045]); and providing a single housing (100, fig. 1) containing the rechargeable battery, the power output(the electrical connector 219, fig. 18), and the portable device transceiver(214, fig. 17Note: fig. 1, 12, 17-18 is the part of single embodiment; where 1, 17-18 is the main embodiment and fig. 12 is an example). Harvey further discloses the portable device is configured to operate in: a mode wherein the portable device is providing network connectivity to the external device in order to provide the internet access to the external device and is not supplying power to the external device (the portable device 100’ is only provide network connectivity to the external devices 312 through , fig. 12), another mode wherein the portable device is supplying power to the external load device and providing network connectivity to the external device in order to provide the internet access to the external device, and wherein the external load device and the external device are the same device (the battery assembly 100 includes a communication gateway 202. In some arrangements, the communication gateway 202 includes the hardware and logic necessary to communicate over multiple channels of data communication. For example, the communication gateway 202 may include a Wi-Fi interface, a cellular modem, a Bluetooth transceiver, a Bluetooth beacon, an RFID transceiver, an NFC transceiver, or a combination thereof. The communication gateway 202 facilitates data communication to and from the battery assembly 100 (and therefore the equipment 302 on which the battery assembly 100 is used) paragraph [0053]; shows that the battery 100 not only provide power to external device but also have the gateway to connect them through internet), and other mode wherein the portable device is supplying power to the external load device and providing network connectivity to the external device in order to provide the internet access to the external device, and wherein the external load device and the external device are separate devices (the battery 100 is providing power to the load device 302 and they are connected to the external device 312 through the internet network 308, fig. 13, paragraph [0057]). However, Harvey is silent about the an operating mode wherein the portable device is supplying power to the external load device and is not providing network connectivity. Bonilla discloses an operating mode wherein the portable device is supplying power to the external load device and is not providing network connectivity (in fig. 4B the portable device 100 provide the power to 115 by connecting the devices together and does not provide any communication connectivity, paragraph [0043], [0044]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of claimed invention to modify Harvey in view of Bonilla to provide the power to load without any commination network, in order to increase the simplicity, reliability, and reduced cost due to fewer components and less complexity. Regarding claim 16, Harvey further discloses the method further comprising supplying a type of power, via a second rechargeable battery of a second portable device, to at least a second load device; and providing network connectivity, via a second portable device transceiver of the second portable device, to a second external device(the device 100 is capable of connecting with the other similar portable device 100 having the same components as described above, 105 battery pack, load devices 302, 312, transceiver 214, fig.12, 17). Regarding claim 17, Harvey further discloses wherein at least one selected from a group consisting of the portable device and the second portable device acts as a network coordinator (fig. 12, paragraph [0055]). Regarding claim 18, Harvey further discloses wherein the portable device transceiver and the second portable device transceiver uses a communication protocol, wherein the communication protocol is at least one selected from a group consisting of WiFi, BLE, Bluetooth, Bluetooth Mesh, Bluetooth 5, Thread, Z-Wave, USB, Serial, LoRaWAN, and Zigbee (paragraph [0060]). Regarding claim 21, Harvey further discloses wherein the mesh network uses at least one selected from a group consisting of point-to-point topology, point-to-multipoint topology, and multipoint-to-multipoint topology (the communication gateway 202 may include a Wi-Fi interface, a cellular modem, a Bluetooth transceiver, a Bluetooth beacon, an RFID transceiver, an NFC transceiver, or a combination thereof. The communication gateway 202 facilitates data communication to and from the battery assembly 100 (and therefore the equipment 302 on which the battery assembly 100 is used), paragraph [0053]Note: Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) typically operates on a point-to-point (star) topology). Regarding claim 22, Harvey further discloses wherein the mesh network uses at least one selected from a group consisting of point-to-point topology, point-to-multipoint topology, and multipoint-to-multipoint topology (the communication gateway 202 may include a Wi-Fi interface, a cellular modem, a Bluetooth transceiver, a Bluetooth beacon, an RFID transceiver, an NFC transceiver, or a combination thereof. The communication gateway 202 facilitates data communication to and from the battery assembly 100 (and therefore the equipment 302 on which the battery assembly 100 is used), paragraph [0053]Note: Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) typically operates on a point-to-point (star) topology). Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Harvey (US 2022/0314819) as applied to claim 9 above, and further in view of Fieldbinder et al. (US 2022/0102995)(take the priority of the provisional application: 63084906), herein after Fieldbinder. Regarding claim 10, Harvey in view of Bonilla discloses the system of claim 9, but does not explicitly disclose that the power source includes at least one selected from a group consisting of a solar array and a generator. Fieldbinder discloses the power source includes at least one selected from a group consisting of a solar array and a generator (The power source 26 may also be another type of power source, such as a solar panel, a wind turbine, a battery pack, an AC grid line, or the like; paragraph [0105]). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of claimed invention to use the teaching of Fieldbinder’s solar panel and the other natural source to produce the energy for rechargeable battery and the battery could be charge without the convention plug in charger. The battery could be charged anywhere without the need of the conventional wall plug outlet. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SADIA KOUSAR whose telephone number is (571)272-3386. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7:30am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julian Huffman can be reached at (571) 272-2147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. SADIA . KOUSAR Examiner Art Unit 2859 /JULIAN D HUFFMAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 22 earlier events
May 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 29, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 06, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 06, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 15, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 26, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706330
POWER STORAGE DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700748
CHARGING CONTROL METHOD, CHARGING CONTROL DEVICE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12651927
WIRELESS CHARGING SYSTEM
4y 2m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12646955
CHARGING CIRCUIT AND INTEGRATED CIRCUIT
4y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12620821
POWER SUPPLY EQUIPMENT
3y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

11-12
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+10.7%)
3y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 121 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month