Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/520,741

MULTIFUNCTIONAL PHYSICAL STORE SYSTEM WITH AUTOMATIC STERILIZATION AND DISINFECTION FUNCTIONS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 08, 2021
Examiner
TAI, XIUYU
Art Unit
1795
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Providence University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allow Rate
586 granted / 1004 resolved
-6.6% vs TC avg
Strong +50% interview lift
Without
With
+49.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1042
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
43.7%
+3.7% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
29.0%
-11.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1004 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation of “ a disinfection device”. This limitation merely states a functional characteristic (i.e., disinfection) without providing any indication about how the functional characteristic is provided. The claim recites “the disinfection device comprising a first control process module, an air intake module , and an air outtake module”. However, the recited functional characteristic does not follow from (is not an inherent property of) the structure recited in the claim and merely having “a first control process module, an air intake module , and an air outtake module” could not perform disinfection. So, it is unclear whether the claim requires some other structure to be added to the apparatus to achieve the functional characteristic or the functional characteristic is due to a manner of operating the device. Furthermore, it is known in the art that there are multiple ways to perform disinfection. Therefore, it is not clear which of those ways are encompassed by the claim. Thus, one having ordinary skill in the art would not be able to draw a clear boundary between what is and is not covered by the claim (see MPEP 2173.05(g) for more information. Claim 1 recites the limitation of “ a sterilization device”. This limitation merely states a functional characteristic (i.e., to carry out a disinfection and sterilization process on the person) without providing any indication about how the functional characteristic is provided. The claim recites “the sterilization device comprising a second control process module, a detection module , and a disinfection spray module”. However, the recited functional characteristic does not follow from (is not an inherent property of) the structure recited in the claim and merely having “a second control process module, a detection module , and a disinfection spray module” could not perform a function of carrying out a disinfection and sterilization process on the person. So, it is unclear whether the claim requires some other structure to be added to the apparatus to achieve the functional characteristic or the functional characteristic is due to a manner of operating the device. Furthermore, it is known in the art that there are multiple ways to carry out a disinfection and sterilization process on the person. Therefore, it is not clear which of those ways are encompassed by the claim. Thus, one having ordinary skill in the art would not be able to draw a clear boundary between what is and is not covered by the claim (see MPEP 2173.05(g) for more information. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the first control process module" in line 7-8, There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Appropriate correction/clarification is required. For the purpose of examination, “a control process module” in line 5-6 will be interpreted as “a first control process module”. Claim 1 recites the limitation "an air outtake module of the air outtake module" in line 9-10. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Appropriate correction/clarification is required. Claim 1 recites the limitation of “ a disinfection module”. This limitation merely states a functional characteristic (i.e., to disinfect a package material of meal) without providing any indication about how the functional characteristic is provided. The claim recites “the sterilization device comprising a second control process module, a detection module , and a disinfection spray module”. However, the recited functional characteristic does not follow from (is not an inherent property of) the structure recited in the claim. So, it is unclear whether the claim requires some other structure to be added to the apparatus to achieve the functional characteristic or the functional characteristic is due to a manner of operating the device. Furthermore, it is known in the art that there are multiple ways to disinfect a package material of meal. Therefore, it is not clear which of those ways are encompassed by the claim. Thus, one having ordinary skill in the art would not be able to draw a clear boundary between what is and is not covered by the claim (see MPEP 2173.05(g) for more information. Due to the dependency to the parent claim, claims 2-10 are rejected. Conclusion Claims 1-10 are rejected. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to XIUYU TAI whose telephone number is (571)270-1855. The examiner can normally be reached Mon.-Fri. 9:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Luan Van can be reached at 571-272-8521. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /XIUYU TAI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1795
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2021
Application Filed
Oct 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12584235
METHOD FOR SURFACE TREATMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582829
PLASMA TREATMENT DEVICES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583770
DEVICE FOR TREATMENT OF LIQUIDS AND THE METHOD OF TREATMENT OF LIQUIDS WITH USE OF THIS DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578267
CARBON MEASUREMENTS IN AQUEOUS SAMPLES USING OXIDATION AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES AND PRESSURES CREATED BY RESISTIVE HEATING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12551861
APPARATUS FOR TREATING MATERIALS WITH PLASMA
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+49.8%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1004 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month