Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/536,549

TORQUE REDUCTION VALVE HAVING SEPARATE STATIC SEAL AND DYNAMIC SEAL

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Nov 29, 2021
Examiner
ROST, ANDREW J
Art Unit
3753
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Xomox Pft Corp.
OA Round
7 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allow Rate
537 granted / 824 resolved
-4.8% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
856
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
45.2%
+5.2% vs TC avg
§102
28.1%
-11.9% vs TC avg
§112
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 824 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 1/16/2026 has been entered. This action is in response to the amendment dated 1/16/2026 that was entered with the submission of the request for continued examination dated 1/16/2026. Claims 1, 11, 16 and 21 are currently amended. Claims 10 and 14 have been cancelled. No claims are newly added. Presently, claims 1-9, 11-13 and 15-23 are pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see the Rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 section on pages 10-12 of the response filed 1/16/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-9, 11-13 and 15-23 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sinkler (US 3536295) in view of Sandling (US 4410003) and further in view of O’Connor (US 3128987) have been fully considered and are persuasive. It is considered that the amendments to claims 1, 11, 16 and 21 to recite that the pair of opposed protrusions extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recess, “beyond the external sleeve surface” overcome the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-9, 11-13 and 15-23 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sinkler (US 3536295) in view of Sandling (US 4410003) and further in view of O’Connor (US 3128987) as provided in the Office action dated 9/16/2025. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of the newly applied reference to Duffey (US 3498317). It is considered that the Duffey reference teaches a valve assembly having a sleeve (15) that is located between a plug (20) and a housing (12) wherein the sleeve (15) includes a pair of opposed apertures (17a, 18a) and wherein the sleeve (15) includes a pair of opposed recesses (it is considered that the pair of reduced sections 100a, 101a as depicted in figure 6 define a first one of the pair of opposed recesses and that the corresponding pair of reduced sections 100a, 101a on the mirrored side of the sleeve 15 defines the second one of the pair of opposed recesses) that are defined in an external surface of the sleeve between the pair of opposed sleeve apertures (17a, 18a), and a pair of opposed protrusions (105a; only the first of the pair of opposed apertures within the first one of the pair of opposed recesses is depicted in figure 6) that extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses, beyond the external sleeve surface (the portion 105a is of a greater cross-section between the apertures 17a, 18a forming a low pressure seal; col. 6, lines 62-65) wherein the pair of opposed recesses and the respective pair of opposed protrusions provide a desired flexibility to the sleeve (col. 4, lines 21-25) and to provide fluid-tight sealing over all essential areas (col. 5, lines 2-4). Therefore, it is considered that the Duffey reference addresses applicant’s concerns and claim language relating to a protrusion (105a) that extends beyond an external sleeve surface (considered the external surface of the sleeve 15) wherein the protrusion (105a) is located within a recess (the recess is defined by the space between the adjacent grooves 100a, 101a) as depicted in figure 6. Since new grounds of rejection were necessitated by applicant’s amendment that was entered with the submission of the request for continued examination, the instant Office action is made non-final. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed 10/16/2025 is acknowledged and has been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-9, 11-13 and 15-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation “a pair of opposed protrusions extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses, beyond the external sleeve surface” in lines 23-25. Claim 1 also recites “a pair of opposed recesses are defined in an external sleeve surface” in line 22. Are the pair of opposed recesses part of the external sleeve surface? Are the pair of opposed protrusions that extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses part of the external sleeve surface? And, if the pair of opposed protrusions are part of the external sleeve surface, how can the pair of opposed protrusions extend “beyond the external sleeve surface”? Clarification and appropriate correction is requested. Claims 2-9 depend from claim 1, and, therefore, claims 2-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph in the same manner as claim 1 above. Claim 11 recites the limitation “a pair of opposed protrusions extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses, beyond the external sleeve surface” in lines 24-26. Claim 11 also recites “a pair of opposed recesses are defined in an external sleeve surface” in line 23. Are the pair of opposed recesses part of the external sleeve surface? Are the pair of opposed protrusions that extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses part of the external sleeve surface? And, if the pair of opposed protrusions are part of the external sleeve surface, how can the pair of opposed protrusions extend “beyond the external sleeve surface”? Clarification and appropriate correction is requested. Claims 12, 13 and 15 depend from claim 11, and, therefore, claims 12, 13 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph in the same manner as claim 11 above. Claim 16 recites the limitation “a pair of opposed protrusions extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses, beyond the external sleeve surface” in lines 19-21. Claim 16 also recites “a pair of opposed recesses are defined in an external sleeve surface” in line 18. Are the pair of opposed recesses part of the external sleeve surface? Are the pair of opposed protrusions that extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses part of the external sleeve surface? And, if the pair of opposed protrusions are part of the external sleeve surface, how can the pair of opposed protrusions extend “beyond the external sleeve surface”? Clarification and appropriate correction is requested. Claims 17-20 depend from claim 16, and, therefore, claims 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph in the same manner as claim 16 above. Claim 21 recites the limitation “a pair of opposed protrusions extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses, beyond the external sleeve surface” in lines 15-175. Claim 21 also recites “a pair of opposed recesses are defined in an external sleeve surface” in line 14. Are the pair of opposed recesses part of the external sleeve surface? Are the pair of opposed protrusions that extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses part of the external sleeve surface? And, if the pair of opposed protrusions are part of the external sleeve surface, how can the pair of opposed protrusions extend “beyond the external sleeve surface”? Clarification and appropriate correction is requested. Claims 22-23 depend from claim 21, and, therefore, claims 22-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph in the same manner as claim 21 above. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or non-obviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1-9, 11-13 and 15-23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sinkler (US 3536295) in view of Sandling (US 4410003) and further in view of Duffey (US 3498317). Claim(s) 1-9, 11-13 and 15-23 will be treated as best understood in view of the rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) above. Regarding claim 1, the Sinkler reference discloses a valve (see figure 2) comprising: a housing (16) including a cylindrical internal chamber (32); and a valve assembly comprising: a plug (20) extending along a central axis (it is considered that the central axis extends along a vertical axis that extends along from the central portion of the stem 46, 38 and to the base of the plug 20 in the orientation depicted in figure 2) and including a plug body having an external plug surface (considered the external surface of the plug 20 that contacts the sleeve 18 as depicted in figure 2), wherein the external plug surface tapers radially outwardly (see figure 2; see also col. 2, lines 39-40) in a first direction (considered the downward direction in the orientation depicted in figure 2) along the central axis; and a sleeve (18) having an internal sleeve surface (it is considered that the internal sleeve surface of the sleeve 20 contacts the external plug surface as depicted in figure 2) defining an interior cavity (the plug 20 is received within the interior cavity as depicted in figure 2), wherein the internal sleeve surface tapers radially outwardly in the first direction (see figure 2), wherein the plug body is positioned within the interior cavity of the sleeve (see figure 2), wherein the plug is rotatable about the central axis relative to the sleeve (see at least col. 2, lines 50-55), wherein the plug is translatable along the central axis relative to the sleeve (it is considered that the plug 4 is translatable relative to the sleeve 3 during installation and by the tightening of the nut 10 as discussed in col. 3, lines 55-64), wherein the sleeve is positioned within the cylindrical internal chamber of the housing (see figure 2) and fixed against movement relative thereto (col. 2, lines 44-48) and wherein the sleeve has a cylindrical shape (the shape of the sleeve 18 defines a cylindrical shape within the cylindrical internal chamber 32; see figure 2); and wherein the sleeve includes an inner sleeve surface (it is considered that the radially inward surface of the sleeve 18 that interacts with the plug 20 constitutes the inner sleeve portion) and an outer sleeve surface (it is considered that the radially outer surface of the sleeve that interacts with the housing 16 constitutes the outer sleeve portion). Firstly, the Sinkler reference does not disclose wherein the sleeve is injection molded onto a cartridge having a cylindrical shape corresponding to the sleeve, wherein the sleeve includes an inner sleeve portion at least partially spaced apart from an outer sleeve portion by the at least one channel having an opening in a top of the sleeve, wherein the sleeve includes a pair of opposed sleeve apertures, and wherein a respective portion of a support frame of the cartridge is secured within the at least one channel via one or more curved slots disposed about the peripheries of the pair of opposed sleeve apertures, wherein connecting portions of the outer and inner sleeve portions occupy the one or more curved slots. However, the Sandling reference teaches a valve assembly having a cartridge (metal cage 38) configured to be removably coupled to a valve body (10) and a sleeve (90) being injection molded (see at least col. 2, lines 18-22) on the cartridge wherein the cartridge has a shape corresponding to the sleeve, wherein the sleeve includes an inner sleeve surface (it is considered that the radially inward surface of the sleeve 90 that interacts with the plug 18 constitutes the inner sleeve surface) having an inner sleeve portion (see the “inner sleeve portion” in the annotated figure 4 below) and an outer sleeve surface (it is considered that the radially outer surface of the sleeve 90 that interacts with the housing 10 constitutes the outer sleeve surface) having an outer sleeve portion (see the “outer sleeve portion” in the annotated figure 4 below) wherein the inner sleeve portion is at least partially spaced apart from the outer sleeve portion by at least one channel (see the “channel” in the annotated figure 4 below; it is considered that the cartridge 38 is received within the channel) having an opening in the top of the sleeve (it is considered that the channel in the sleeve 90 has an opening in the top of the sleeve wherein the cartridge 38 is received within the opening), wherein the sleeve (90) includes a pair of opposed sleeve apertures (it is considered that the portions of the sleeve 90 that surround the flanges 42 of the cartridge 38 constitute opposed sleeve apertures; see the “sleeve aperture” in the annotated figure 5 below), and wherein a respective portion of a support frame of the cartridge (it is considered that the cartridge 38 defines a support frame) is secured within the at least one channel via one or more curved slots (it is considered that the sleeve is received within the opening 43 which is considered to form a curved slot; see col. 4, lines 54-56) disposed about peripheries of the pair of opposed sleeve apertures (it is considered that the curved slots of the support frame 38 are disposed between the pair of opposed sleeve apertures, and, therefore, it is considered that the curved slots are located about the peripheries of the opposed sleeve apertures), wherein connecting portions of the outer and inner sleeve portions occupy the one or more curved slots (it is considered that the portion of the sleeve that connects the inner sleeve portion with the outer sleeve portion and is received within the opening 43 constitutes the connecting portions of the outer and inner sleeve portions that occupy the one or more curved slots), wherein the cartridge contains the cold flow tendency of the sleeve material and wherein the cartridge assists in ensuring the provision of high pressure sealing areas on the sleeve in use of the valve assembly (col. 2, lines 3-14). PNG media_image1.png 1179 914 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 1028 811 media_image2.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to provide the sleeve of the Sinkler reference as being injection molded on a cartridge as taught by the Sandling reference wherein the cartridge has a shape corresponding to the sleeve, wherein the sleeve includes an inner sleeve portion at least partially spaced apart from an outer sleeve portion by at least one channel having an opening in a top of the sleeve, wherein the sleeve includes a pair of opposed sleeve apertures, and wherein a respective portion of a support frame of the cartridge is secured within the at least one channel via one or more curved slots disposed about peripheries of the pair of opposed sleeve apertures, wherein connecting portions of the outer and inner sleeve portions occupy the one or more curved slots, in order to provide a substantially rigid reinforcing means to the sleeve which serves the purpose of preventing cold flow of the sleeve adjoining the ports of the housing, and ensuring the provision of high pressure sealing areas on the sleeve in use of the valve assembly. Further, it is considered that the cartridge would have a cylindrical shape since the Sandling reference teaches providing a cartridge (Sandling: metal cage 38) having a corresponding shape as the sleeve (Sandling: see figures 1-5) wherein the sleeve (Sinkler: 18) of the Sinkler reference has a cylindrical shape (Sinkler: see figure 2). Secondly, the Sinkler reference of the combination of the Sinkler reference and the Sandling reference does not disclose or suggest wherein a pair of opposed recesses are defined in an external sleeve surface of the outer sleeve portion between the pair of opposed sleeve apertures, and a pair of opposed protrusions extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses, beyond the external sleeve surface. However, the Duffey reference teaches a valve assembly having a sleeve (15) that is located between a plug (20) and a housing (12) wherein the sleeve (15) includes a pair of opposed apertures (17a, 18a) and wherein the sleeve (15) includes a pair of opposed recesses (it is considered that the pair of reduced sections 100a, 101a as depicted in figure 6 define a first one of the pair of opposed recesses and that the corresponding pair of reduced sections 100a, 101a on the mirrored side of the sleeve 15 defines the second one of the pair of opposed recesses) that are defined in an external surface of the sleeve between the pair of opposed sleeve apertures (17a, 18a), and a pair of opposed protrusions (105a; only the first of the pair of opposed apertures within the first one of the pair of opposed recesses is depicted in figure 6) that extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses, beyond the external sleeve surface (the portion 105a is of a greater cross-section between the apertures 17a, 18a forming a low pressure seal; col. 6, lines 62-65) wherein the pair of opposed recesses and the respective pair of opposed protrusions provide a desired flexibility to the sleeve (col. 4, lines 21-25) and to provide fluid-tight sealing over all essential areas (col. 5, lines 2-4). Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to provide the external sleeve surface of the outer sleeve portion of the Sinkler reference of the combination of the Sinkler reference and the Sandling reference with a pair of opposed recesses between the pair of opposed sleeve apertures, and a pair of opposed protrusions extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses, beyond the external sleeve surface, that frictionally engage the surface of the housing as taught by the Duffey reference in order to frictionally engage a central internal housing surface of the cylindrical internal chamber of the housing with a fluid-tight sealing of the sleeve. In regards to claim 2, the Sinkler reference of the combination of the Sinkler reference, the Sandling reference and the Duffey reference and the Sandling reference discloses wherein the plug further includes an input shaft (Sinkler: 38) extending from the plug in a second direction (Sinkler: considered the upward direction in the orientation depicted in figure 2) along the central axis. In regards to claim 3, the Sinkler reference of the combination of the Sinkler reference, the Sandling reference and the Duffey reference discloses wherein the plug is configured to rotate about the central axis relative to the sleeve in response to application of an input torque to the input shaft (Sinkler: see at least col. 2, lines 50-55). In regards to claim 4, the Sinkler reference of the combination of the Sinkler reference, the Sandling reference and the Duffey reference discloses wherein the valve assembly further comprises a nut (Sinkler: 36) having a fixed position along the central axis relative to the sleeve, wherein the nut threadably engages the input shaft (Sinkler: see at least col. 3, lines 2-6), wherein the plug is configured to translate along the central axis relative to the sleeve in response to rotation of the nut relative to the input shaft (Sinkler: see at least col. 3, lines 2-9). In regards to claim 5, the Sinkler reference of the combination of the Sinkler reference, the Sandling reference and the Duffey reference wherein the external plug surface is configured to sealingly engage the internal sleeve surface when the plug is at a first position (Sinkler: considered the position depicted in figure 2) along the central axis relative to the sleeve, wherein the external plug surface is configured to disengage the internal sleeve surface when the plug is at a second position along the central axis relative to the sleeve (Sinkler: it is considered that external plug surface would be spaced and disengage from the internal sleeve surface when the plug 20 is moved downward and out of the housing 16 during disassembly and, therefore, the plug would be at a second position). In regards to claim 6, the Sinkler reference of the combination of the Sinkler reference, the Sandling reference and the Duffey reference discloses wherein the external plug surface tapers radially outwardly in the first direction along the central axis at a first angle (Sinkler: see figure 2), wherein the internal sleeve surface tapers radially outwardly in the first direction at the first angle (Sinkler: see figure 2). In regards to claim 7, the Sinkler reference of the combination of the Sinkler reference, the Sandling reference and the Duffey reference discloses wherein the plug (Sinkler: 20) includes a plug flow passage (Sinkler: 22) extending through the plug body. In regards to claim 8, the Sinkler reference of the combination of the Sinkler reference, the Sandling reference and the Duffey reference discloses wherein the plug flow passage is configured to selectively align with the pair of opposed sleeve apertures (Sinkler: see figure 2 for the pair of opposed sleeve apertures 28, 30 being in alignment with the plug flow passage 22). In regards to claim 9, the Sinkler reference of the combination of the Sinkler reference, the Sandling reference and the Duffey reference discloses wherein the plug flow passage (Sinkler: 22) is transverse to the central axis (Sinkler: see figure 2). Regarding claim 11, the Sinkler reference discloses a valve (see figure 2) comprising: a housing (16) including an internal housing surface defining a cylindrical internal chamber (32) extending along a central axis (it is considered that the central axis extends along a vertical axis that extends along from the central portion of the stem 46, 38 and to the base of the plug 20 in the orientation depicted in figure 2); and a valve assembly including: a plug (20) extending along the central axis and including a plug body having an external plug surface (considered the external surface of the plug 20 that contacts the sleeve 18 as depicted in figure 2), and a sleeve (18) positioned within the cylindrical internal chamber of the housing and fixed against movement relative thereto (see col. 2, lines 44-48) and wherein the sleeve has a cylindrical shape (the shape of the sleeve 18 defines a cylindrical shape within the cylindrical internal chamber 32; see figure 2), the sleeve having: an outer sleeve portion (it is considered that the radially outer surface of the sleeve that interacts with the housing 16 constitutes the outer sleeve portion) including an external sleeve surface (it is considered that the surface of the sleeve 18 that interacts with the housing 16 constitutes the external sleeve surface) configured to sealingly engage the internal housing surface of the housing (see figure 2), and an inner sleeve portion (it is considered that the radially inward surface of the sleeve 18 that interacts with the plug 20 constitutes the inner sleeve portion) at least partially spaced apart from the outer sleeve portion (it is considered that the outer sleeve portion and the inner sleeve portion are spaced from each other by at least the thickness of the sleeve 16) and including an internal sleeve surface (it is considered that the surface of the sleeve 18 that interacts with the plug 20 constitutes the internal sleeve surface) defining an interior cavity for rotatably receiving the plug body (the plug 20 is received within the interior cavity of the sleeve 18 as depicted in figure 2), wherein the internal sleeve surface is configured to sealingly engage the external plug surface of the plug body (see at least figure 2). Firstly, the Sinkler reference does not disclose wherein the sleeve is injection molded onto a cartridge having a cylindrical shape corresponding to the sleeve, wherein the sleeve includes the inner sleeve portion at least partially spaced apart from the outer sleeve portion by the at least one channel having an opening in a top of the sleeve, wherein the sleeve includes a pair of opposed sleeve apertures, and wherein a respective portion of a support frame of the cartridge is secured within the at least one channel via one or more curved slots disposed about peripheries of the pair of opposed sleeve apertures, wherein connecting portions of the outer and inner sleeve portions occupy the one or more curved slots. However, the Sandling reference teaches a valve assembly having a cartridge (metal cage 38) configured to be removably coupled to a valve body (10) and a sleeve (90) being injection molded (see at least col. 2, lines 18-22) on the cartridge wherein the cartridge has a shape corresponding to the sleeve, wherein the sleeve includes an inner sleeve surface (it is considered that the radially inward surface of the sleeve 90 that interacts with the plug 18 constitutes the inner sleeve surface) having an inner sleeve portion (see the “inner sleeve portion” in the annotated figure 4 above) and an outer sleeve surface (it is considered that the radially outer surface of the sleeve 90 that interacts with the housing 10 constitutes the outer sleeve surface) having an outer sleeve portion (see the “outer sleeve portion” in the annotated figure 4 above) wherein the inner sleeve portion is at least partially spaced apart from the outer sleeve portion by at least one channel (see the “channel” in the annotated figure 4 above; it is considered that the cartridge 38 is received within the channel) having an opening in the top of the sleeve (it is considered that the channel in the sleeve 90 has an opening in the top of the sleeve wherein the cartridge 38 is received within the opening), wherein the sleeve (90) includes a pair of opposed sleeve apertures (it is considered that the portions of the sleeve 90 that surround the flanges 42 of the cartridge 38 constitute opposed sleeve apertures; see the “sleeve aperture” in the annotated figure 5 above), and wherein a respective portion of a support frame of the cartridge (it is considered that the cartridge 38 defines a support frame) is secured within the at least one channel via one or more curved slots (it is considered that the sleeve is received within the opening 43 which is considered to form a curved slot) disposed about peripheries of the pair of opposed sleeve apertures (it is considered that the curved slots of the support frame 38 are disposed between the pair of opposed sleeve apertures, and, therefore, it is considered that the curved slots are located about the peripheries of the opposed sleeve apertures), wherein connecting portions of the outer and inner sleeve portions occupy the one or more curved slots (it is considered that the portion of the sleeve that connects the inner sleeve portion with the outer sleeve portion and is received within the opening 43 constitutes the connecting portions of the outer and inner sleeve portions that occupy the one or more curved slots), wherein the cartridge contains the cold flow tendency of the sleeve material and wherein the cartridge assists in ensuring the provision of high pressure sealing areas on the sleeve in use of the valve assembly (col. 2, lines 3-14). Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to provide the sleeve of the Sinkler reference as being injection molded on a cartridge as taught by the Sandling reference wherein the cartridge has a shape corresponding to the sleeve, wherein the sleeve includes an inner sleeve portion at least partially spaced apart from an outer sleeve portion by at least one channel having an opening in a top of the sleeve, wherein the sleeve includes a pair of opposed sleeve apertures, and wherein a respective portion of a support frame of the cartridge is secured within the at least one channel via one or more curved slots disposed about peripheries of the pair of opposed sleeve apertures, wherein connecting portions of the outer and inner sleeve portions occupy the one or more curved slots, in order to provide a substantially rigid reinforcing means to the sleeve which serves the purpose of preventing cold flow of the sleeve adjoining the ports of the housing, and ensuring the provision of high pressure sealing areas on the sleeve in use of the valve assembly. Further, it is considered that the cartridge would have a cylindrical shape since the Sandling reference teaches providing a cartridge (Sandling: metal cage 38) having a corresponding shape as the sleeve (Sandling: see figures 1-5) wherein the sleeve (Sinkler: 18) of the Sinkler reference has a cylindrical shape (Sinkler: see figure 2). Secondly, the Sinkler reference of the combination of the Sinkler reference and the Sandling reference does not disclose or suggest wherein a pair of opposed recesses are defined in an external sleeve surface of the outer sleeve portion between the pair of opposed sleeve apertures, and a pair of opposed protrusions extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses, beyond the external sleeve surface. However, the Duffey reference teaches a valve assembly having a sleeve (15) that is located between a plug (20) and a housing (12) wherein the sleeve (15) includes a pair of opposed apertures (17a, 18a) and wherein the sleeve (15) includes a pair of opposed recesses (it is considered that the pair of reduced sections 100a, 101a as depicted in figure 6 define a first one of the pair of opposed recesses and that the corresponding pair of reduced sections 100a, 101a on the mirrored side of the sleeve 15 defines the second one of the pair of opposed recesses) that are defined in an external surface of the sleeve between the pair of opposed sleeve apertures (17a, 18a), and a pair of opposed protrusions (105a; only the first of the pair of opposed apertures within the first one of the pair of opposed recesses is depicted in figure 6) that extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses, beyond the external sleeve surface (the portion 105a is of a greater cross-section between the apertures 17a, 18a forming a low pressure seal; col. 6, lines 62-65) wherein the pair of opposed recesses and the respective pair of opposed protrusions provide a desired flexibility to the sleeve (col. 4, lines 21-25) and to provide fluid-tight sealing over all essential areas (col. 5, lines 2-4). Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to provide the external sleeve surface of the outer sleeve portion of the Sinkler reference of the combination of the Sinkler reference and the Sandling reference with a pair of opposed recesses between the pair of opposed sleeve apertures, and a pair of opposed protrusions extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses, beyond the external sleeve surface, that frictionally engage the surface of the housing as taught by the Duffey reference in order to frictionally engage a central internal housing surface of the cylindrical internal chamber of the housing with a fluid-tight sealing of the sleeve. In regards to claim 12, the Sinkler reference of the combination of the Sinkler reference, the Sandling reference and the Duffey reference discloses wherein the external sleeve surface and the internal housing surface are configured to collectively define a static seal (Sinkler: it is considered that the sleeve 18 forms a static seal with the housing 16 since the sleeve 18 is fixed relative to the housing 16; see col. 2, lines 44-48). In regards to claim 13, the Sinkler reference of the combination of the Sinkler reference, the Sandling reference and the Duffey reference discloses wherein the internal sleeve surface and the external plug surface are configured to collectively define a dynamic seal (Sinkler: it is considered that the plug 20 is able to rotate relative to the sleeve 18; see at least col. 2, lines 50-55; wherein the rotation of the plug 20 relative to the sleeve 18 would provide a dynamic seal). In regards to claim 15, the combination of the combination of the Sinkler reference, the Sandling reference and the Duffey reference discloses wherein the inner sleeve portion is coupled to the outer sleeve portion by at least one of the connecting portions (Sandling: it is considered that the portion of the sleeve that surrounds the metal cage 38 and is received through the opening 43 would connect the inner sleeve portion and the outer sleeve portion and would constitute the at least one connecting portion). Regarding claim 16, the Sinkler reference discloses the structure wherein one of ordinary skill in the art would perform the method of making and/or using a valve including: providing a valve (see figure 2), wherein the valve includes: a housing (1) having a cylindrical internal chamber (32) defining a central axis (it is considered that the central axis extends along a vertical axis that extends along from the central portion of the stem 46, 38 and to the base of the plug 20 in the orientation depicted in figure 2), a sleeve (18) positioned within the cylindrical internal chamber of the housing and fixed against movement relative thereto (see at least col. 2, lines 50-55), the sleeve including an internal sleeve surface (it is considered that the internal sleeve surface of the sleeve 20 contacts the external plug surface as depicted in figure 2) defining an interior cavity (it is considered that the plug 20 is received within the interior cavity; see figure 2) and wherein the sleeve has a cylindrical shape (the shape of the sleeve 18 defines a cylindrical shape within the cylindrical internal chamber 32; see figure 2); and a plug (20) extending along the central axis and including a plug body (the passage 22 extends through the plug body), the plug body being positioned within the interior cavity (see figure 2) and having an external plug surface (considered the external surface of the plug 20), wherein the plug is initially at a first location (it is considered that the plug 20 is spaced from the sleeve 18 at least during installation) along the central axis relative to the sleeve such that the external plug surface is spaced apart from the internal sleeve surface, wherein the sleeve includes an inner sleeve surface (it is considered that the radially inward surface of the sleeve 18 that interacts with the plug 20 constitutes the inner sleeve portion) and an outer sleeve surface (it is considered that the radially outer surface of the sleeve that interacts with the housing 16 constitutes the outer sleeve portion); and translating the plug along the central axis from the first location to a second location relative to the sleeve (it is considered that the plug 20 is translated relative to the sleeve 18 during installation and by the tightening of the nut 36 as discussed in col. 3, lines 2-9). Firstly, the Sinkler reference does not disclose wherein the act of providing the valve includes: wherein the sleeve includes an inner sleeve portion at least partially spaced apart from an outer sleeve portion by at least one channel having an opening in a top of the sleeve, wherein the sleeve includes a pair of opposed sleeve apertures, and wherein a respective portion of a support frame of a cartridge is secured within the at least one channel via one or more curved slots disposed about peripheries of the pair of opposed sleeve apertures, wherein connecting portions of the outer and inner sleeve portions occupy the one or more curved slots; and wherein the act of providing the valve includes injection molding the sleeve onto the cartridge having a cylindrical shape corresponding to the sleeve. However, the Sandling reference teaches a valve assembly having a cartridge (metal cage 38) configured to be removably coupled to a valve body (10) and a sleeve (90) being injection molded (see at least col. 2, lines 18-22) on the cartridge wherein the cartridge has a shape corresponding to the sleeve, wherein the sleeve includes an inner sleeve surface (it is considered that the radially inward surface of the sleeve 90 that interacts with the plug 18 constitutes the inner sleeve surface) having an inner sleeve portion (see the “inner sleeve portion” in the annotated figure 4 above) and an outer sleeve surface (it is considered that the radially outer surface of the sleeve 90 that interacts with the housing 10 constitutes the outer sleeve surface) having an outer sleeve portion (see the “outer sleeve portion” in the annotated figure 4 above) wherein the inner sleeve portion is at least partially spaced apart from the outer sleeve portion by at least one channel (see the “channel” in the annotated figure 4 above; it is considered that the cartridge 38 is received within the channel) having an opening in the top of the sleeve (it is considered that the channel in the sleeve 90 has an opening in the top of the sleeve wherein the cartridge 38 is received within the opening), wherein the sleeve (90) includes a pair of opposed sleeve apertures (it is considered that the portions of the sleeve 90 that surround the flanges 42 of the cartridge 38 constitute opposed sleeve apertures; see the “sleeve aperture” in the annotated figure 5 above), and wherein a respective portion of a support frame of the cartridge (it is considered that the cartridge 38 defines a support frame) is secured within the at least one channel via one or more curved slots (it is considered that the sleeve is received within the opening 43 which is considered to form a curved slot) disposed about peripheries of the pair of opposed sleeve apertures (it is considered that the curved slots of the support frame 38 are disposed between the pair of opposed sleeve apertures, and, therefore, it is considered that the curved slots are located about the peripheries of the opposed sleeve apertures), wherein connecting portions of the outer and inner sleeve portions occupy the one or more curved slots (it is considered that the portion of the sleeve that connects the inner sleeve portion with the outer sleeve portion and is received within the opening 43 constitutes the connecting portions of the outer and inner sleeve portions that occupy the one or more curved slots), wherein the cartridge contains the cold flow tendency of the sleeve material and wherein the cartridge assists in ensuring the provision of high pressure sealing areas on the sleeve in use of the valve assembly (col. 2, lines 3-14). Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to perform the method of injection molding the sleeve of the Sinkler reference onto a cartridge as taught by the Sandling reference wherein the cartridge has a shape corresponding to the sleeve, wherein the sleeve includes an inner sleeve portion at least partially spaced apart from an outer sleeve portion by at least one channel having an opening in a top of the sleeve, wherein the sleeve includes a pair of opposed sleeve apertures, and wherein a respective portion of a support frame of the cartridge is secured within the at least one channel via one or more curved slots disposed about peripheries of the pair of opposed sleeve apertures, wherein connecting portions of the outer and inner sleeve portions occupy the one or more curved slots in order to provide a substantially rigid reinforcing means to the sleeve which serves the purpose of preventing cold flow of the sleeve adjoining the ports of the housing, and ensuring the provision of high pressure sealing areas on the sleeve in use of the valve assembly. Further, it is considered that the cartridge would have a cylindrical shape since the Sandling reference teaches providing a cartridge (Sandling: metal cage 38) having a corresponding shape as the sleeve (Sandling: see figures 1-5) wherein the sleeve (Sinkler: 18) of the Sinkler reference has a cylindrical shape (Sinkler: see figure 2). Secondly, the Sinkler reference of the combination of the Sinkler reference and the Sandling reference does not disclose or suggest wherein a pair of opposed recesses are defined in an external sleeve surface of the outer sleeve portion between the pair of opposed sleeve apertures, and a pair of opposed protrusions extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses, beyond the external sleeve surface. However, the Duffey reference teaches a valve assembly having a sleeve (15) that is located between a plug (20) and a housing (12) wherein the sleeve (15) includes a pair of opposed apertures (17a, 18a) and wherein the sleeve (15) includes a pair of opposed recesses (it is considered that the pair of reduced sections 100a, 101a as depicted in figure 6 define a first one of the pair of opposed recesses and that the corresponding pair of reduced sections 100a, 101a on the mirrored side of the sleeve 15 defines the second one of the pair of opposed recesses) that are defined in an external surface of the sleeve between the pair of opposed sleeve apertures (17a, 18a), and a pair of opposed protrusions (105a; only the first of the pair of opposed apertures within the first one of the pair of opposed recesses is depicted in figure 6) that extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses, beyond the external sleeve surface (the portion 105a is of a greater cross-section between the apertures 17a, 18a forming a low pressure seal; col. 6, lines 62-65) wherein the pair of opposed recesses and the respective pair of opposed protrusions provide a desired flexibility to the sleeve (col. 4, lines 21-25) and to provide fluid-tight sealing over all essential areas (col. 5, lines 2-4). Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to provide the external sleeve surface of the outer sleeve portion of the Sinkler reference of the combination of the Sinkler reference and the Sandling reference with a pair of opposed recesses between the pair of opposed sleeve apertures, and a pair of opposed protrusions extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses, beyond the external sleeve surface, that frictionally engage the surface of the housing as taught by the Duffey reference in order to frictionally engage a central internal housing surface of the cylindrical internal chamber of the housing with a fluid-tight sealing of the sleeve. In regards to claim 17, the combination of the Sinkler reference, the Sandling reference and the Duffey reference discloses wherein the act of translating the plug includes sealingly engaging the external plug surface with the internal sleeve surface (Sinkler: the external surface of the plug 20 contacts the internal surface of the sleeve 18 to provide a seal). In regards to claim 18, the combination of the Sinkler reference, the Sandling reference and the Duffey reference discloses wherein the act of providing the valve includes inserting the sleeve (Sinkler: 18) into the internal chamber of the housing (Sinkler: 16) in a first direction (Sinkler: considered the upward direction in the orientation depicted in figure 2) along the central axis, wherein the act of translating the plug (Sinkler: 20) includes translating the plug along the central axis in a second direction (Sinkler: considered the downward direction in the orientation depicted in figure 2). In regards to claim 19, the combination of the Sinkler reference, the Sandling reference and the Duffey reference discloses wherein the second direction (Sinkler: considered the downward direction in the orientation depicted in figure 2) is opposite from the first direction (Sinkler: considered the upward direction in the orientation depicted in figure 2). In regards to claim 20, the combination of the Sinkler reference, the Sandling reference and the Duffey reference discloses wherein the act of inserting the sleeve includes applying a compressive force to the external sleeve surface of the sleeve (Sinkler: the nut 36 provides a compressive force to the sleeve; see at least col. 3, lines 2-9). Regarding claim 21, the Sinkler reference discloses a valve (see figure 2) comprising: a first static member (housing 16) having a cylindrical internal chamber (32); a second static member (sleeve 18) secured against movement relative to the first static member (see at least col. 2, lines 50-55) wherein the second static member has a cylindrical shape (the shape of the sleeve 18 defines a cylindrical shape within the cylindrical internal chamber 32; see figure 2) and wherein the second static member includes an inner surface (it is considered that the radially inward surface of the sleeve 18 that interacts with the plug 20 constitutes the inner sleeve portion) and an outer surface (it is considered that the radially outer surface of the sleeve that interacts with the housing 16 constitutes the outer sleeve portion); a static seal between the first and second static members (it is considered that the compression of the sleeve 18 to the housing 16 creates a static seal) within the cylindrical internal chamber (32); a dynamic member (plug 20) movable relative to the first and second static members between an open state and a closed state (see at least col. 2, lines 50-55); and a dynamic seal between the dynamic member (plug 20) and at least one of the first or second static members (it is considered that the plug 20 is able to rotate relative to the sleeve 18; see at least col. 2, lines 50-55; wherein the rotation of the plug 20 relative to the sleeve 18 would provide a dynamic seal). Firstly, the Sinkler reference does not disclose wherein the second static member is injection molded onto a cartridge having a cylindrical shape corresponding to the second static member, wherein the second static member includes the inner portion at least partially spaced apart from the outer portion by the at least one channel having an opening in a top of the second static member, wherein the sleeve includes a pair of opposed sleeve apertures, and wherein a respective portion of a support frame of the cartridge is secured within the at least one channel via one or more curved slots disposed about peripheries of the pair of opposed sleeve apertures, wherein connecting portions of the inner and outer portions occupy the one or more curved slots. However, the Sandling reference teaches a valve assembly having a cartridge (metal cage 38) configured to be removably coupled to a valve body (10) and a sleeve (90) being injection molded (see at least col. 2, lines 18-22) on the cartridge wherein the cartridge has a shape corresponding to the sleeve, wherein the sleeve includes an inner sleeve surface (it is considered that the radially inward surface of the sleeve 90 that interacts with the plug 18 constitutes the inner sleeve surface) having an inner sleeve portion (see the “inner sleeve portion” in the annotated figure 4 above) and an outer sleeve surface (it is considered that the radially outer surface of the sleeve 90 that interacts with the housing 10 constitutes the outer sleeve surface) having an outer sleeve portion (see the “outer sleeve portion” in the annotated figure 4 above) wherein the inner sleeve portion is at least partially spaced apart from the outer sleeve portion by at least one channel (see the “channel” in the annotated figure 4 above; it is considered that the cartridge 38 is received within the channel) having an opening in the top of the sleeve (it is considered that the channel in the sleeve 90 has an opening in the top of the sleeve wherein the cartridge 38 is received within the opening), wherein the sleeve (90) includes a pair of opposed sleeve apertures (it is considered that the portions of the sleeve 90 that surround the flanges 42 of the cartridge 38 constitute opposed sleeve apertures; see the “sleeve aperture” in the annotated figure 5 above), and wherein a respective portion of a support frame of the cartridge (it is considered that the cartridge 38 defines a support frame) is secured within the at least one channel via one or more curved slots (it is considered that the sleeve is received within the opening 43 which is considered to form a curved slot) disposed about peripheries of the pair of opposed sleeve apertures (it is considered that the curved slots of the support frame 38 are disposed between the pair of opposed sleeve apertures, and, therefore, it is considered that the curved slots are located about the peripheries of the opposed sleeve apertures), wherein connecting portions of the outer and inner sleeve portions occupy the one or more curved slots (it is considered that the portion of the sleeve that connects the inner sleeve portion with the outer sleeve portion and is received within the opening 43 constitutes the connecting portions of the outer and inner sleeve portions that occupy the one or more curved slots), wherein the cartridge contains the cold flow tendency of the sleeve material and wherein the cartridge assists in ensuring the provision of high pressure sealing areas on the sleeve in use of the valve assembly (col. 2, lines 3-14). Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to provide the second static member of the Sinkler reference as being injection molded on a cartridge as taught by the Sandling reference wherein the cartridge has a shape corresponding to the sleeve, wherein the second static member includes an inner portion at least partially spaced apart from an outer portion by at least one channel having an opening in a top of the second static member, wherein the sleeve includes a pair of opposed sleeve apertures, and wherein a respective portion of a support frame of the cartridge is secured within the at least one channel via one or more curved slots disposed about peripheries of the pair of opposed sleeve apertures wherein connecting portions of the outer and inner sleeve portions occupy the one or more curved slots in order to provide a substantially rigid reinforcing means to the sleeve which serves the purpose of preventing cold flow of the second static member adjoining the ports of the housing, and ensuring the provision of high pressure sealing areas on the second static member in use of the valve assembly. Further, it is considered that the cartridge would have a cylindrical shape since the Sandling reference teaches providing a cartridge (Sandling: metal cage 38) having a corresponding shape as the second static member (Sandling: see figures 1-5) wherein the second static member (Sinkler: 18) of the Sinkler reference has a cylindrical shape (Sinkler: see figure 2). Secondly, the Sinkler reference of the combination of the Sinkler reference and the Sandling reference does not disclose or suggest wherein a pair of opposed recesses are defined in an external sleeve surface of the outer sleeve portion between the pair of opposed sleeve apertures, and a pair of opposed protrusions extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses, beyond the external sleeve surface. However, the Duffey reference teaches a valve assembly having a sleeve (15) that is located between a plug (20) and a housing (12) wherein the sleeve (15) includes a pair of opposed apertures (17a, 18a) and wherein the sleeve (15) includes a pair of opposed recesses (it is considered that the pair of reduced sections 100a, 101a as depicted in figure 6 define a first one of the pair of opposed recesses and that the corresponding pair of reduced sections 100a, 101a on the mirrored side of the sleeve 15 defines the second one of the pair of opposed recesses) that are defined in an external surface of the sleeve between the pair of opposed sleeve apertures (17a, 18a), and a pair of opposed protrusions (105a; only the first of the pair of opposed apertures within the first one of the pair of opposed recesses is depicted in figure 6) that extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses, beyond the external sleeve surface (the portion 105a is of a greater cross-section between the apertures 17a, 18a forming a low pressure seal; col. 6, lines 62-65) wherein the pair of opposed recesses and the respective pair of opposed protrusions provide a desired flexibility to the sleeve (col. 4, lines 21-25) and to provide fluid-tight sealing over all essential areas (col. 5, lines 2-4). Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to provide the external sleeve surface of the outer sleeve portion of the Sinkler reference of the combination of the Sinkler reference and the Sandling reference with a pair of opposed recesses between the pair of opposed sleeve apertures, and a pair of opposed protrusions extend outwardly from the pair of opposed recesses, beyond the external sleeve surface, that frictionally engage the surface of the housing as taught by the Duffey reference in order to frictionally engage a central internal housing surface of the cylindrical internal chamber of the housing with a fluid-tight sealing of the sleeve. In regards to claim 22, the combination of the Sinkler reference, the Sandling reference and the Duffey reference discloses wherein the dynamic seal (Sinkler: considered the seal between the plug 20 and the sleeve 18) is separate from the static seal (Sinkler: considered the seal between the sleeve 18 and the housing 16). In regards to claim 23, the combination of the Sinkler reference, the Sandling reference and the Duffey reference discloses wherein the dynamic seal (Sinkler: considered the seal between the plug 20 and the sleeve 18) is spaced apart from the static seal (Sinkler: considered the seal between the sleeve 18 and the housing 16; it is considered that the dynamic seal is spaced apart from the static seal by at least the thickness of the sleeve 18). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Andrew J. Rost whose telephone number is (571) 272-2711. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday from 8:00 am to 4:30 pm EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Craig Schneider can be reached at 571-272-3607 or Kenneth Rinehart can be reached at 571-272-4881. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated-interview-request-air-form. /ANDREW J ROST/Examiner, Art Unit 3753 /CRAIG M SCHNEIDER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 29, 2021
Application Filed
Mar 23, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Sep 27, 2023
Response Filed
Jan 12, 2024
Final Rejection — §103, §112
Apr 19, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 22, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 04, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Sep 10, 2024
Response Filed
Nov 27, 2024
Final Rejection — §103, §112
Feb 04, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 04, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Jun 17, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 11, 2025
Final Rejection — §103, §112
Jan 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601044
GATE VALVE, SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601437
Low-Spill Coupling Assembly
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590662
LOW-SPILL COUPLING ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584565
EVAPORATIVE COOLER OPERABLE IN A RANGE OF MOUNTING ANGLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578020
INLET CONTROLLED REGULATING VALVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+19.6%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 824 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month