Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/537,265

SAMPLE ANALYZING METHOD AND SAMPLE ANALYZER

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Nov 29, 2021
Priority
Jun 11, 2019 — continuation of PCTCN2019090770
Examiner
EOM, ROBERT J
Art Unit
1797
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
425 granted / 739 resolved
-7.5% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+34.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
765
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
45.3%
+5.3% vs TC avg
§102
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
§112
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 739 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Interpretation Regarding limitations recited in claims 15-16, 19, 23, 25-26, and 32, which are directed to a manner of operating the disclosed sample analyzer, it is noted that neither the manner of operating a disclosed device nor material or article worked upon further limit an apparatus claim. Said limitations do not differentiate apparatus claims from prior art. See: MPEP § 2114 and 2115. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-2, 4, 9, 11-12, 15-16, 19, 23, 25-26, and 31-32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being incomplete for omitting essential steps, such omission amounting to a gap between the steps. See MPEP § 2172.01. The omitted steps are: the last paragraph of the claim recites an incomplete conditional limitation (see: recited “if it is determined…” with no subsequent method step). This is further inconsistent with the language of the other conditional limitations which positively recite a subsequent method step (see: lines 12-14 which recites “outputting the first measurement result”, if it is determined; and 15-20 which recites “preparing a second test sample solution…”, if it is determined. Claims 2, 4, 9, 11-12, and 31 depend on claim 1. Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being incomplete for omitting essential elements, such omission amounting to a gap between the elements. See MPEP § 2172.01. The omitted steps are: the last paragraph of the claim recites an incomplete conditional limitation (see: recited “if it is determined…” with no subsequent steps the processor is configured to perform). This is further inconsistent with the language of the other conditional limitations which positively recite a subsequent method step (see: lines 39-41 which recites “output the first measurement result”, if it is determined; and 41-48 which recites “instruct the sample preparation apparatus…”, if it is determined. Claims 16, 19, 23, and 25-26 depend on claim 15. Claim 32 recites the limitation "the sample analyzer of claim 1" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The Applicants are advised, amending the claim to depend on claim 15 is one way to resolve the indefiniteness issues. Appropriate corrections are required. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-2, 4, 9, 11-12, 15-16, 19, 23, 25-26, and 31-32 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT J EOM whose telephone number is (571)270-7075. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday (9:00AM-5:00PM). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lyle Alexander can be reached at 5712721254. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT J EOM/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1797
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Nov 20, 2024
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 20, 2025
Response Filed
May 28, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Aug 28, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 14, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 28, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12716061
Hydrodynamically Controlled Electric Fields for High Throughput Transformation & High Throughput Parallel Transformation Platform
7y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12697054
BLOOD COLLECTION TUBE SORTING AND CENTRIFUGAL BALANCING DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12681005
ELECTROCHEMICAL SENSING APPROACH FOR MOLECULE QUANTIFICATION IN BODY FLUIDS
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674791
METHODS OF EVALUATING SMALL MOLECULE-MODIFIED POLYMERS IN COMPOSITIONS
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676434
INTERCONNECT DEVICE AND MODULE USING SAME
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+34.7%)
3y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 739 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month