Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/542,355

METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR A DATA TRANSMISSION SCHEME FOR NARROW-BAND INTERNET OF THINGS (NB-IOT)

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 03, 2021
Examiner
DECKER, CASSANDRA L
Art Unit
2466
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
7 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
346 granted / 479 resolved
+14.2% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
506
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
46.6%
+6.6% vs TC avg
§102
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
§112
31.2%
-8.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 479 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This Office action is in response to the RCE filed 13 October 2025. Claims 1-8 are pending in this application. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 13 October 2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1, 3, 5, and 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yi (US 2018/0249509; Please note this is a new primary reference) in view of Chen et al. (US 2017/0181135, hereinafter Chen ‘135). For Claims 1, 3, 5, and 7, Yi teaches a method of wireless communication, an apparatus of wireless communication comprising: at least one processor and memory coupled to the at least one processor (see paragraphs 152-154), an apparatus of wireless communication, comprising means for performing the method (see paragraphs 152-154), and a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions which when executed by a processor performs a method (see paragraphs 152-154), the method comprising: configuring two or more narrowband Internet of Things (NB-IoT) Physical Resource Blocks (PRBs) located at different frequency positions for transmission in a same cell (see paragraphs 99-103: multiple PRBs on multiple NB-IoT carriers; paragraphs 113-114: configuration per cell specific values); configuring a reference signal (CRS) based on a same scrambling sequence for the two or more NB-IoT PRBs located at the different frequency positions for the transmission in the same cell (see paragraphs 130-131, 133, 139: one scrambling sequence used over a resource unit; sequence scrambling of CRS over every NB subframe); and the CRS in each of the two or more NB-IoT PRBs located at the different frequency positions (see paragraphs 130-131). Yi as applied above is not explicit as to, but Chen ‘135 teaches the CRS being a cell specific reference signal (see paragraph 32: allocation of REs in a PRB pair for cell specific reference signals), and transmitting the CRS in each of the two or more NB-IoT PRBs located at the different frequency positions (see paragraphs 30, 32, 34-35: PRBs spread over channel frequency; paragraph 32: SFBC) Thus it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the application was filed to apply the framework and signals of Chen ‘135 when managing reference signals in the NB-IoT system of Yi. The motivation would be to provide for the communication over NB-IoT carriers using known signaling. Claim(s) 2, 4, 6, and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yi (US 2018/0249509) and Chen et al. (US 2017/0181135, hereinafter Chen ‘135) as applied to claims 1, 3, 5, and 7 above, and further in view of Zhang et al. (US 2014/0071936). For Claims 2, 4, 6, and 8, the references as applied above are not explicit as to, but in a similar field of endeavor, Zhang teaches that it is known to use a UE specific identifier when determining scrambling sequences for a transmission in order to use a same scrambling sequence for resource blocks having different cell identifiers (see paragraphs 7-9, 12: need for same scrambling sequence even when transmission point identifiers are different; paragraphs 55, 59, 61, 63: using a UE id for generating a same scrambling sequence). Thus it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the application was filed to employ a same scrambling sequence in a pair of physical resource blocks as in Yi and Chen ‘135 even in the case of configuring a different Physical Cell Identifier in each of the two or more RBs as in Zhang. One of ordinary skill would have been able to do so with the reasonably predictable result of ensuring a UE is able to receive and descramble the two or more resource blocks even when the PCIDs differ. Response to Arguments The amendment filed 13 October 2025 has been entered. Applicant’s arguments with respect to rejections under 35 USC 103 have been fully considered, but are either not persuasive as argued in the advisory action of 20 August 2025 or are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection introduced herein. The claims remain rejected under 35 USC 103. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Gao et al. (US 2012/0281567) teaches a system in which CRS share a cell ID but are transmitted on all transmit receive points. Wang et al. (US 2018/0063828) teaches a system in which initialization values of CRS scrambling sequences are fixed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CASSANDRA L DECKER whose telephone number is (571)270-3946. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30 am - 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Faruk Hamza can be reached at 571-272-7969. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CASSANDRA L DECKER/Examiner, Art Unit 2466 10/14/2025 /FARUK HAMZA/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2466
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 03, 2021
Application Filed
Feb 17, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 24, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 30, 2023
Response Filed
Aug 10, 2023
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 20, 2023
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 29, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 14, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
May 22, 2024
Response Filed
Jul 09, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Oct 22, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 26, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
May 05, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 04, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Aug 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 13, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 22, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598024
METHOD FOR DUPLICATELY RECEIVING CONTROL MESSAGE, AND DEVICE THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598600
XAPP CONFLICT MITIGATION FRAMEWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593348
rAPPs THAT GENERATE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INTERFERENCE MITIGATION xAPPS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587328
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR RECEIVING PPDU THROUGH MULTIPLE RUS IN WIRELESS LAN SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574086
Channel State Information Processing Methods, Electronic Device, and Storage Medium
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+15.7%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 479 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month