Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 17/548,368

ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC PHOTOCONDUCTOR, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME, AND ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 10, 2021
Priority
Dec 21, 2020 — JP 2020-211737 +1 more
Examiner
SULLIVAN IV, CHARLES COLLINS
Art Unit
1737
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Fuji Electric Co., Ltd.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
67 granted / 97 resolved
+4.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
116
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
60.1%
+20.1% vs TC avg
§102
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 97 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 4/23/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment The amendment filed 4/23/2026 has been entered. Claims 1, 4-5, and 7-11 remain pending. Claims 1 and 10 are amended. Claim 6 has been canceled. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see page 10-13, filed 4/23/2026, with respect to the rejections of claims 1 and 4-11 under 35 USC 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Kobayashi (WO 2019077706) in view of Kitagawa (WO 2019142342). Applicant argues Kobayashi does not disclose or teach an additional electron transport material having general formula (ET2), or the specific structures of (ET2-1), (ET2-2), (ET2-4), (ET2-5), or (ET2-6). Applicant further argues Azuma, previously relied upon to teach general formula (ET2) in the now canceled claim 6, does not teach or suggest the specific compositions of (ET2-1), (ET2-2), (ET2-4), (ET2-5), or (ET2-6) in a way that would be obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art. Examiner agrees Kobayashi alone does not disclose or teach a naphthalenetetracarboxdiimide based. Examiner agrees the newly added, specific examples of general formula (ET2) are not specifically disclosed by Azuma. Kitagawa is now relied upon to teach inclusion of (ET2) and its specific examples. Kitagawa teaches the general formula (ET2) as well as all the specific examples (ET2-1), (ET2-2), (ET2-4), (ET2-5), and (ET2-6), as well as their use in combination with an azoquinone based electron transport material. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1, 4-5, and 7-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kobayashi (WO 2019077706) in view of Kitagawa (WO 2019142342). Regarding claims 1 and 4-5, Kobayashi discloses electrophotographic photoreceptors, including single layer and laminated positively charged photoreceptors, comprising a conductive substrate and a photosensitive layer(s) on the support ([0014]-[0017]). Kobayashi further discloses general formula (ET1), which has the same structure as the ET1 claimed in the instant application, including the same definition of the R groups, with the exception of “at least two of R4 to R8 represent chlorine” ([0028]). PNG media_image1.png 102 266 media_image1.png Greyscale Kobayashi further discloses (ET1-7), (ET1-8), (ET1-27), (ET1-40), (ET1-53), and (ET1-70) (page 9-13), which are identical to the claimed (ET1-1), (ET1-2), (ET1-6), (ET1-8), (ET1-10), and (ET1-12) of the Instant Application ([0030]-[0035]). PNG media_image2.png 92 238 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 90 244 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 90 246 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 92 252 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 94 246 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image7.png 88 250 media_image7.png Greyscale While Kobayashi does not disclose compositions (ET1-3) and (ET1-4) of the Instant Claim 1, one of skill in art would recognize they are obvious configurations of the R groups of general formula (ET1) in view of the specific examples above. It is clear from the specific examples disclosed by Kobayashi that the number and position of chlorine atoms in the R4 to R8 groups cover a wide range of positions as well as examples with 1-3 chlorine atoms. According to the MPEP, “Where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, it is not inventive to discover the optimum or workable ranges by routine experimentation.” In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454, 456, 105 USPQ 233, 235 (CCPA 1955). (MPEP 2144.05 II A). Kobayashi does not disclose the solubility of the azoquinone derivative in THF. However, the solubility SETM(THF) is a material property of the azoquinone derivative, and the Instant Specification notes both the claimed (ET1-4) and (ET1-3) have a solubility of 1g or less (Instant specification [0087], [0091]). However, Kobayashi does not disclose a naphthalenetetracarboxdiimide compound represented by (ET2). Kitagawa teaches an electrophotographic photosensitive member comprising multiple electron transport materials, the first is a naphthalenetetracarboxylic acid diimide compound represented by general formula (1), and the second may be an azoquinone compound. ([0014]-[0017], [0033]-[0034]). Kitagawa further teaches specific examples of general formula (1) are represented by the compounds of (ET1)-(ET4), (ET11), and (ET12) ([0035]-[0036]). PNG media_image8.png 102 250 media_image8.png Greyscale PNG media_image9.png 266 511 media_image9.png Greyscale PNG media_image10.png 137 529 media_image10.png Greyscale As seen above, ET1-ET2 of Kitagawa are identical to the claimed ET2-1 and ET2-2 of the Instant Application. Also, ET4, ET11, and ET12 of Kitagawa are identical to the claimed ET2-4, ET2-5, and ET2-6 of the Instant Application. Kitagawa further teaches by using the specific electron transport materials higher image quality without ghost images ([0022]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to ensure the electrophotographic photoreceptor of Kobayashi includes a second electron transport material selected from the specified ET1-4 or ET11-12, as taught by Kitagawa, to improve image quality without forming ghost images. Regarding claim 7, Kobayashi discloses all limitations as set forth above. Kobayashi further discloses the electron transport material in the positively charged single layer and multilayer photoreceptors may be used alone or in combinations of two or more ([0059], [0064]). Kobayashi further discloses ET1-4, which is identical to the claimed (ET-1) of the instant application ([0030]). PNG media_image11.png 86 244 media_image11.png Greyscale Regarding claim 8, Kobayashi discloses all limitations as set forth above. Kobayashi further discloses a multilayer positively charged photoreceptor, with a charge transport layer and a charge generation layer formed on the charge transport layer. The charge generation layer comprises the electron transport material ([0062]-[0064]). Regarding claim 9, Kobayashi discloses all limitations as set forth above. Kobayashi further discloses a positively charged single layer photoreceptor, including a single layer photosensitive layer comprising the electron transport material ([0055], [0056]). Regarding claim 10, Kobayashi discloses all limitations as set forth above. Kobayashi further discloses a method of manufacturing the positively charged photoreceptor by dip coating the conductive support to form the photosensitive layer ([0070]) Regarding claim 11, Kobayashi discloses all limitations as set forth above. Kobayashi further discloses the photoreceptor is used in an electrophotographic apparatus ([0011], [0071]-[0074], figure 2). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES COLLINS SULLIVAN IV whose telephone number is (571)272-2208. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber Orlando can be reached at (571) 270-3149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.C.S./Examiner, Art Unit 1737 /AMBER R ORLANDO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Jun 11, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 12, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 15, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 23, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 24, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12699335
CORE-SHELL PARTICLE, AND TONER
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693608
CARRIER CORE MATERIAL, AND ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC DEVELOPMENT CARRIER AND ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC DEVELOPER USING SAME
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687796
TONER, TONER PRODUCTION METHOD, AND TWO-COMPONENTDEVELOPER
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12681400
TONER COMPOSITIONS AND ADDITIVES
4y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681402
TONER FOR DEVELOPING ELECTROSTATIC LATENT IMAGE AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOF
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+14.7%)
3y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 97 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month