Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/552,165

SELF-POWERED ANALYTE SENSOR AND DEVICES USING THE SAME

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Dec 15, 2021
Examiner
CATINA, MICHAEL ANTHONY
Art Unit
3791
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Abbott Laboratories
OA Round
4 (Final)
31%
Grant Probability
At Risk
5-6
OA Rounds
5y 6m
To Grant
61%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 31% of cases
31%
Career Allow Rate
167 granted / 535 resolved
-38.8% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+29.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
5y 6m
Avg Prosecution
54 currently pending
Career history
589
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
§103
36.8%
-3.2% vs TC avg
§102
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
§112
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 535 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Receipt is acknowledged of applicant's amendment filed on 10/16/25. Claim 29 is new. Claims 1-2 and 4-29 are currently pending and an action on the merits is as follows. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 2 and 4-29 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Thomas et al. US 2010/0198034 in view of He et al. US 2009/0171178. Regarding claims 1, 14 and 22, Thomas discloses an analyte monitoring device, comprising: a self-powered analyte sensor configured to generate signal associated with a monitored analyte level, wherein the monitored analyte level is one or more of a glucose level or a lactate level ([¶121] the sensor may have a power source or be self-powered. [¶34,53,54] glucose is detected); and sensor electronics operatively coupled to the self-powered analyte sensor configured to receive signals generated by the self-powered analyte sensor and to communicate data corresponding to analyte level monitored by the self- powered analyte sensor ([¶37] the sensor transmits the sensor data when powered by a reader device); a radio frequency identification device (RFID) circuit operatively coupled to the buffering circuit and configured to communicate data corresponding to the generated signals associated with the monitored analyte level ([¶785,108,115-117] RF or RFID communication is used to power the sensor and to turn on the sensor electronics for communication) wherein the sensor electronics transitions from an inactive state to an active state when powered by a remote power source and upon receipt of a query signal from the remote power source, wherein the self-powered analyte sensor is configured to generate the signals when in contact with the interstitial fluid and when the sensor electronics is in the inactive state ([¶60,61,68] the sensor takes and stores readings when it is not powered by an outside source and then transmits those stored readings when it is powered by the reader device), and in response to the query signal, communicates data corresponding to the generated signals associated with the monitored analyte level to the remote power source ([¶37] the radio receiver automatically initiates communication from the sensor). Thomas discloses using a buffering circuit ([¶116] buffer 705) in the electronics of the reader device but does not specifically disclose the sensor electronics includes a buffering circuit operatively coupled to the self-powered analyte sensor. He teaches a similar sensor that uses a buffering circuit in the on body sensors electronics ([¶63-64]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the time of filing to combine the device of Thomas with the teachings of He in order to further filter the data before transmission ([¶63]). Regarding claim 2, Thomas discloses the self-powered analyte sensor is configured to continuously generate the signals corresponding to the monitored analyte level when in fluid contact with interstitial fluid ([¶38,51] the sensor can continuously transmit monitored data or collect the measurements and store them when inactive, or not powered by the reader device, and then send them when the reader device is in communication with the sensor). Regarding claims 10, 18 and 25, Thomas discloses the self-powered analyte sensor is configured to generate the signals associated with the monitored analyte level when in contact with the interstitial fluid and when the sensor electronics is in the inactive state ([¶51,60,61,68] the sensor takes and stores readings that are then only transmitted when the electronics are activated by the reader device). Regarding claim 4, Thomas discloses the sensor electronics are not operational when in the inactive state ([¶52,68,78,102] the device can be configured such that the electronics are only active on demand when the reader device is within range to transmit power). Regarding claim 5, He teaches the sensor electronics includes a buffering circuit configured to receive the generated signals from the self-powered analyte sensor ([¶63-64]). Regarding claim 6, Thomas discloses the sensor electronics includes a radio frequency identification device (RFID) circuit operatively coupled to the buffering circuit and configured to communicate the data corresponding to the generated signals associated with the monitored analyte level ([¶75,108,115-117] an RFID may be used in the communication circuitry and a buffer is also used). Regarding claims 7, 15 and 23, Thomas discloses a housing enclosing the self- powered analyte sensor and the sensor electronics, wherein the housing is sealed to inhibit moisture from entering the housing ([¶111] the assembly may be water tight). Regarding claims 8 and 16, Thomas discloses the query signal includes an RFID signal ([¶75] RFID circuitry and communication can be used). Regarding claims 9, 17 and 24, Thomas discloses the sensor electronics transitions from the active state to the inactive state when the sensor electronics is not within the range of the remote power source ([¶52,68,78,102] the device can be configured such that the electronics are only active on demand when the reader device is within range to transmit power). Regarding claims 11 and 19, Thomas discloses comprising a housing enclosing the self- powered analyte sensor and the sensor electronics, the housing including one or more mechanical components for physically detachably engaging with a remote device ([¶112,144,154][FIG17] the remote device has a portion that engages the sensor to provide power). Regarding claims 12 and 20, Thomas discloses the remote device includes the remote power source ([¶112,144,154][FIG17] battery and power circuit, the electronics assembly itself can be detachable). Regarding claims 13 and 21, Thomas discloses the one or more mechanical components includes one or more of a releasable latch, a releasable arm, or a releasable lock ([¶144,154][FIG17] 1710). Regarding claim 26-28, Thomas discloses the sensor electronics are configured to periodically communicate the data corresponding to the signals associated with the monitored analyte level in response to receiving, at a predetermined time interval, the query signal from the remote power source ([¶82,86] the device can transmit on demand based on signals from the reader). Regarding claim 29, He teaches the sensor electronics further comprises communication circuitry, and wherein the buffering circuit is configured to isolate the self-powered analyte sensor from communication circuitry ([FIG.8] the buffer circuit is in between the sensor and transmission circuitry so it isolates the sensor from the transmission circuitry). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-2 and 4-29 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on the combination of references applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL ANTHONY CATINA whose telephone number is (571)270-5951. The examiner can normally be reached 10-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Chen can be reached on 5712723672. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL A CATINA/Examiner, Art Unit 3791 /TSE W CHEN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3791
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 15, 2021
Application Filed
Apr 12, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 06, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 13, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 05, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jun 13, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 16, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599304
CONFIGURABLE HARDWARE PLATFORM FOR PHYSIOLOGICAL MONITORING OF A LIVING BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12484853
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTERACTING WITH AN IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Patent 12478282
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR COLLECTING SPIROMETRY DATA
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Patent 12471854
Systems and Methods For Monitoring a Patient
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 18, 2025
Patent 12453483
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING BLOOD PRESSURE ZONES DURING AUTOREGULATION MONITORING
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 28, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
31%
Grant Probability
61%
With Interview (+29.7%)
5y 6m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 535 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month