Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/553,213

METHOD FOR ENCRYPTING AND STORING COMPUTER FILES AND ASSOCIATED ENCRYPTION AND STORAGE DEVICE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Dec 16, 2021
Examiner
PERUNGAVOOR, VENKATANARAY
Art Unit
2492
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sagemcom Broadband SAS
OA Round
6 (Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
877 granted / 999 resolved
+29.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1042
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
§103
43.7%
+3.7% vs TC avg
§102
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
§112
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 999 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This office action is in response to the application filed on or reply to the remarks of 2/18/2026. The instant application has claims 11-17, 19 pending. The system, method and medium for having an client based access to file. There a total of 8 claims. Response to Arguments The applicant argues that key store maintain a list of files and permissions is integrated into centralized architecture. Vainstein discloses an keystore having key pairs that is accessible by central server for allowing access to internal users based on permission found in the header of each file see Par. 0033 & Par. 0037-0039. That is, the key store is accessed by the central server to allow authenticated users with permissions for retrieve the key pair for decrypting the file, in that way it integrated into an centralized architecture within the same network/organization. The applicant argues that identifier is based on combination of username and password is not taught by cited prior art. Vainstein discloses user identifier being used for referencing the user. And mentions all multiple possibilities, including what is mentioned in the claims, i.e combination and username see Par. 0068. Further, the applicant has not provide any advantage of this particular method thus it is merely an design choice thus not given patentable weight see MPEP 2144.04, VI, C. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 11-17, 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Patent Pub 2004/0064710 to Vainstein in view of ShadowCrypt: Encrypted Web Applications for Everyone to He and further in view US Patent Pub 2016/0277374 to Reid. Regarding claim 11, 17, 19, Vainstein discloses A method for encrypting and storing a computer file, the method being implemented by a device, known as a "key store", for securing accesses to said computer file, the key store being embedded in a home network gateway(Abstract, internal user of organization & Fig. 1 item 104 key store) within the keystore: - establishing a list of n pairs of keys, each pair of keys comprising respectively a private key and a th client among a plurality of clients authorised to access said computer file, wherein the unique identifier of the i" client comprises a combination of:- a user name and/or a password and/or a derivative of these elements, and- a unique identifier of a device (Fig. 2 item 202-206, key pair for partner is created and stored in key store & par. 0038, key store of public-private key pair & Par. 0068, multiple client identifier is possible including what is mentioned like combination of username and password & Par. 0033 & Par. 0037-0039, the key store in part of internal network), - receiving said computer file and encrypting it as an encrypted version of said computer file, by using a key for encrypting said computer file(Par. 0043, the document is encrypted & Par. 0030-0031 & Par. 0047-0048), - recording an encrypted version of said computer file, encrypted by using said key for encrypting said computer file, in a file storage space accessible from the key store, the encrypted version of the computer file being associated with the encrypted versions of the encryption key(Fig. 3 item 304, 310 & Par. 0017-0018, the internal user and external users are stored in key store & Par. 0043 & Par. 0047-0048), - associating the file, in a list of files encrypted and stored under the control of said key store, with one or more unique identifiers of pairs of keys, associated with the unique identifiers of the clients authorized to access said computer file, as well as with a pointer to an encrypted version of said computer file recorded in the file storage space(Par. 0047 & Par. 0043, the key store for each partner and user being stored). Vaistein does not disclose encrypting the encryption key in as many encrypted versions as there are public keys, each of the encrypted versions of the encryption key being encrypted with one of the public keys in the pairs of keys of the clients authorised to access the file. In the same field of endeavor as the claimed invention, He discloses encrypting the encryption key in as many encrypted versions as there are public keys and related clients authorized to access said computer file to obtain a plurality of encrypted versions of the encryption key, each of the encrypted versions of the encryption key being encrypted with one of the public keys in the pairs of keys of the clients authorised to access the file(5 User Interface & Fig. 6 & 2.2 ShadowCrypt, an number of keys are used for each users with encrypted version of the files & 4.2 Encrypting Text & see 5. User Interface, different color key representing different versions.). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of claimed invention to modify Vainstein invention to incorporate encrypting the encryption key in as many encrypted versions as there are public keys, each of the encrypted versions of the encryption key being encrypted with one of the public keys in the pairs of keys of the clients authorised to access the file for the advantage of selective access to files according to the user as taught in He see 4.2 Encrypting Text. He nor Vainstein disclose PNG media_image1.png 289 644 media_image1.png Greyscale Reid discloses PNG media_image1.png 289 644 media_image1.png Greyscale see Fig. 1 item Key Master & Fig. 4 item Key Manager and File Broker & Fig. 20 & Fig. 22 item New Key Master and Old Key Master & Registry & Par. 0071 & Par. 00172 & Par. 0174 & Par. 0207, updates the files access rights and keys for user/patients/doctors in registry. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of claimed invention to modify Vainstein invention to incorporate updating the registries for user and files for the advantage of accommodate the changes for permissions as taught in Reid see Par. 0208 & Par. 0219. Regarding claim 12. The combined method of Vainstein, He and Reid, mutatis mutandis, Vainstein discloses the method for encrypting and storing a computer file according to claim 11, wherein: - establishing the list of n pairs of keys comprises an addition of an nth pair of keys associated with a unique identifier of an nth client authorised to access the computer file in the list of pairs of keys, and/or wherein - an identifier of an itfi pair of keys is inserted in the list of encrypted files and stored by said key store, in association with said computer file for purposes of granting to an ithclient newly authorised to access the computer file a right of access to the computer file(Par. 0047-0048, key store that is updated). Regarding claim 13. the combined method of Vainstein, He and Reid , mutatis mutandis, Vainstein discloses the method for encrypting and storing a computer file according to claim 11, wherein: - establishing the list of n pairs of keys comprises a removing of an ith pair of keys associated with a unique identifier of an ith client authorised to access the computer file in the list of pairs of keys, and/or wherein - an identifier of an itfi pair of keys is removed from the list of files encrypted and stored by said key store, in association with said computer file for the purpose of preventing the ith client, previously authorised, having access to the computer file(Par. 0047-0048, key store that is updated). Regarding claim 14. The combined method of Vainstein, He and Reid , mutatis mutandis, Vainstein discloses the method for encrypting and storing a computer file according to claim 11, wherein a unique identifier of a client comprises a user name and/or a password and/or a derivative of these elements(Par. 0063-0064, the user certificate and password is checked). Regarding claim 15. The combined method of Vainstein, He and Reid , mutatis mutandis, Vainstein discloses the method for encrypting and storing a computer file according to claim 14, wherein one or more unique identifiers of a client comprise a unique identifier of a device used by a user of the key store(Par. 0047-0048, key store with each user & Par. 0058). Regarding claim 16. the combined method of Vainstein, He and Reid , mutatis mutandis, Vainstein discloses the method for encrypting and storing a computer file according to claim 11, comprising a step of authenticating a client authorised to access said key store verifying that said client is connected to said key store device by using alocal area network of the LAN type, by usinga cable connection or an encrypted wireless connection(Fig. 8 item Network A, B & Fig. 1 item 102, 104 & Fig 4 item 402, user access allowed) Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Venkat Perungavoor whose telephone number is (571)272-7213. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rupal Dharia can be reached on 571-272-3880. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VENKAT PERUNGAVOOR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2492 Email: venkatanarayan.perungavoor@uspto.gov
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 16, 2021
Application Filed
Apr 18, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 29, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 30, 2024
Response Filed
Jul 31, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 06, 2024
Notice of Allowance
Nov 06, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 08, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 18, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 22, 2025
Response Filed
May 12, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Oct 15, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 17, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 22, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Feb 18, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602462
ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE-ENABLED AUTHENTICATION BASED ON USER METADATA
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596820
Secure Cloaking of Data
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596828
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SOVEREIGN DATA STORAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598191
Secure Content Management Through Authentication
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592922
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF DEVICE AUTHENTICATION INCLUDING FEATURES OF CIRCUIT TESTING AND VERIFICATION IN CONNECTION WITH KNOWN BOARD INFORMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+3.5%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 999 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month