Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/561,339

CART SANITIZER/WASHER

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Dec 23, 2021
Examiner
SARANTAKOS, KAYLA ROSE
Art Unit
1799
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Techni LLC
OA Round
4 (Final)
31%
Grant Probability
At Risk
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 10m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 31% of cases
31%
Career Allow Rate
19 granted / 61 resolved
-33.9% vs TC avg
Strong +51% interview lift
Without
With
+51.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
105
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
50.5%
+10.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§112
17.3%
-22.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 61 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Claim amendments filed 16 January 2026 are acknowledged. Claims 4-6, 8, 10-12, and 14-16 are pending with claims 1-3, 7, 9, and 13 being cancelled. Applicant’s amendments to the drawings overcome each and every objection previously presented in the Non-Final Office Action mailed 16 October 2025. Applicant’s amendments to claim 11 are sufficient to overcome the previously presented 35 U.S.C. 112(b) rejection in the Non-Final Office Action mailed 16 October 2025. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 16 January 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to applicant's argument that Majdali in view of Metheny does not teach a controller receives a sequence of at least one wash cycle, one rinse cycle, and/or a sanitization cycle, a recitation of the intended use of the claimed invention must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. Majdali teaches wherein the control system includes a processor that execute a preprogrammed routine stored in the memory (paragraph [0039]) and that adjustments to the control system may be operator controller (paragraph [0052]). This indicates that the controller as taught by Majdali is not only capable of receiving and executing a sequence of instructions, it is taught explicitly. Additionally, for further support, Metheny teaches a controller which produces a sequence of wash, rinse, and germicidal application (paragraph [0015]) and that programming of such a controller is matter known in the art to those of ordinary skill (paragraph [0041]). Therefore, Metheny separately teaches a controller capable of receiving and executing a sequence of instructions to automate the components of the sanitizing system. Following the above logic, the rejection of claims 4-6, 8, 10-12, and 14-16 are maintained. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over by Majdali (US 20190298866 A1) in view of Metheny (US 20080210268 A1). Regarding claim 11, Majdali teaches a systems for sanitizing a cart (system for sanitizing a ride vehicle, abstract), comprising a sanitization chamber formed by a right sidewall panel, a left sidewall panel, a front sidewall panel, a read sidewall panel, a ceiling panel and a floor (Figure 2 shows a housing “52” of the sanitization system “10” defined by four walls, a top, and a bottom. The length of the housing is defined as “54” and the bottom of the housing is defined as the ride path “16”) capable of operating in a closed wash state (both doors are kept closed during sanitization process, paragraph [0032]) and in an open sanitization state (housing may not completely enclose or surround vehicle, paragraph [0042]); ”); a sanitizer container configured to store sanitizer for killing at least one of viruses, bacteria, and microorganisms on the cart (Figure 3 storage tank “86” holds cleaning solution. Cleaning solution may be anti-bacterial liquid); and a sanitizer pump configured to receive sanitizer from the container and deliver the sanitizer to the right sidewall and the left side wall via a conduit (nozzles receive cleaning solution from pump, paragraph [0034], and Figure 9 nozzles “21” on the left and right sidewalls “212” and “214”); an ultraviolet (UV) germicidal irradiation system (utilizes ultraviolet light to remove bacteria from surfaces, paragraph [0022]); a controller in communication with the rotating bar and the UVGI system (control system activates the ultraviolet light, paragraph [0037] and ultraviolet light sources are attached to mechanism arm, paragraph [0025]); wherein the controller receives a sequence of at least one wash cycle, at least one rinse cycle, and/or a sanitization cycle (control system may include a process or that executes instructions stored in memory, paragraph [0039]), and automates the operation of at least one of the sanitizer pump, the circulation pump, and the UVGI system based on the sequence (control system activates the ultraviolet light when vehicle is detected at a particular position, paragraph [0006]); wherein one or more carts can be individually treated within the sanitization chamber in the closed wash state (access door is opened to receive vehicle and kept closed during sterilization, paragraph [0032]) and one or more carts can be simultaneously treated in the sanitization chamber in the open sanitization state (enable cleaning of multiple ride vehicles simultaneously, paragraph [0060]), but does not teach a detergent container coupled to the sanitizer container for storing wash detergent for cleaning the cart during the closed wash state; and a circulation pump coupled to the sanitizer container for circulating a mixture of a supply of water and the wash detergent from the detergent container to wash the cart positioned within the sanitization chamber in the closed wash state; and a controller in communication with the sanitizer pump and the circulation pump. However, Metheny teaches a detergent container coupled to the sanitizer container for storing wash detergent for cleaning the cart during the closed wash state (Figure 5 liquid supply tank “68” mounted together, and wash liquids are preferably detergent solutions follows by a germicidal sanitizing solution, paragraph [0016]); and a circulation pump coupled to the sanitizer container for circulating a mixture of a supply of water and the wash detergent from the detergent container to wash the cart positioned within the sanitization chamber in the closed wash state (cleaning liquid of water containing detergent fed by a pump to the spray nozzles, paragraph [0036]); and a controller in communication with the sanitizer pump and the circulation pump (controller produces a sequence of wash, rinse, germicidal application and dry phase, paragraph [0015], and controller operates the pump, paragraph [0041]). Majdali and Metheny are considered analogous to the current invention because all are in the field of cart sanitizing and washing systems. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the sanitizing system with combined sequence of washing and sanitizing taught by Metheny because Metheny teaches it is beneficial to both a consumer and a company to eliminate as much contamination as possible from a shopping cart (paragraphs [0003]-[0006]). Regarding claim 12, the combination of Majdali and Metheny teaches all aspects of the current invention including entrance and exit doors through which a cart enters and exits the sanitization chamber (Figure 2 first access door “62” and second access door “60”, Majdali). Claims 4-6 and 14-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Majdali in view of Metheny and Fanourgiakis (US 8480814 B1). Regarding claim 4, Majdali teaches a systems for sanitizing a cart (system for sanitizing a ride vehicle, abstract), comprising a sanitization chamber formed by a right sidewall panel, a left sidewall panel, a front sidewall panel, a read sidewall panel, a ceiling panel and a floor (Figure 2 shows a housing “52” of the sanitization system “10” defined by four walls, a top, and a bottom. The length of the housing is defined as “54” and the bottom of the housing is defined as the ride path “16”); a sanitizer container configured to store sanitizer for killing at least one of viruses, bacteria, and microorganisms on the cart (Figure 3 storage tank “86” holds cleaning solution. Cleaning solution may be anti-bacterial liquid); and a sanitizer pump configured to receive sanitizer from the container and deliver the sanitizer to the right sidewall and the left side wall via a conduit (nozzles receive cleaning solution from pump, paragraph [0034], and Figure 9 nozzles “21” on the left and right sidewalls “212” and “214”); an ultraviolet (UV) germicidal irradiation system (utilizes ultraviolet light to remove bacteria from surfaces, paragraph [0022]); a controller in communication with the UVGI system (control system activates the ultraviolet light, paragraph [0037]); wherein the controller receives a sequence of at least one wash cycle, at least one rinse cycle, and/or a sanitization cycle (control system may include a process or that executes instructions stored in memory, paragraph [0039]), and automates the operation of at least one of the sanitizer pump, the circulation pump, the rotating bar, and the UVGI system based on the sequence (control system activates the ultraviolet light when vehicle is detected at a particular position, paragraph [0006]); does not teach a detergent container coupled to the sanitizer container for storing wash detergent for cleaning the cart during the closed wash state; and a circulation pump coupled to the sanitizer container for circulating a mixture of a supply of water and the wash detergent from the detergent container to wash the cart positioned within the sanitization chamber in the closed wash state; a controller in communication with the sanitizer pump, the circulation pump, and the rotating bar; and a distribution box coupled to the ceiling panel or a rotating bar coupled to the distribution box and configured to receive the sanitizer or the water-detergent mixture from distribution box and rotate or spin the sanitizer or the water-detergent mixture as a result of force being imparted to the sanitizer by the sanitizer pump, wherein the rotating bar is configured with nozzles for spraying the sanitizer or the water-detergent mixture. However, Metheny teaches a detergent container coupled to the sanitizer container for storing wash detergent for cleaning the cart during the closed wash state (Figure 5 liquid supply tank “68” mounted together, and wash liquids are preferably detergent solutions follows by a germicidal sanitizing solution, paragraph [0016]); and a circulation pump coupled to the sanitizer container for circulating a mixture of a supply of water and the wash detergent from the detergent container to wash the cart positioned within the sanitization chamber in the closed wash state (cleaning liquid of water containing detergent fed by a pump to the spray nozzles, paragraph [0036]); and a controller in communication with the sanitizer pump and the circulation pump (controller produces a sequence of wash, rinse, germicidal application and dry phase, paragraph [0015], and controller operates the pump, paragraph [0041]). Metheny does not teach a distribution box coupled to the ceiling panel or a rotating bar coupled to the distribution box and configured to receive the sanitizer from distribution box and rotate or spin the sanitizer as a result of force being imparted to the sanitizer by the sanitizer pump, wherein the rotating bar is configured with nozzles for spraying the sanitizer. Majdali and Metheny are considered analogous to the current invention because all are in the field of cart sanitizing and washing systems. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the sanitizing system with combined sequence of washing and sanitizing taught by Metheny because Metheny teaches it is beneficial to both a consumer and a company to eliminate as much contamination as possible from a shopping cart (paragraphs [0003]-[0006]). Fanourgiakis teaches a distribution box (distribution junction box, column 13 line 12); and a rotating bar coupled to the distribution box and configured to receive the sanitizer from distribution box (Figure 7 rotating bar “198” connected to distribution box “124”) and rotate or spin the sanitizer as a result of force being imparted to the sanitizer by the sanitizer pump (rotates whenever fluid under pressure is flowing through the plumbing, column 19 lines 51-52), wherein the rotating bar is configured with nozzles for spraying the sanitizer (Figure 9 nozzles “138” on rotating bar “198”); and a controller is in communication with the rotating bar (automatic mode on the control panel will automatically cycle through every aspect of the washing the shopping cart, column 18 lines 40-42). Majdali and Fanourgiakis are considered analogous to the current invention because all are in the field of cart cleaning systems. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the sanitizing system taught by Majdali with the distribution box and rotating bar taught by Fanourgiakis teaches the distribution box ensures optimal pressure and flowrate throughout the system (column 13 liens 59-60) and Majdali teaches a rotating arm allows the cleaning solution to applied to the target at multiple angles and distances, paragraph [0059]). Regarding claim 5, the combination of Majdali, Metheny, and Fanourgiakis teaches wherein the UVGI system is comprised of at least one UV lamp (Figure 1 ultraviolet light source “18”, Majdali). Regarding claim 6, the combination of Majdali. Metheny, and Fanourgiakis teaches entrance and exit doors through which a cart enters and exits the sanitization chamber (Figure 2 first access door “62” and second access door “60”, Majdali). Regarding claim 14, the combination of Majdali and Metheny teaches all aspects of the current invention except a distribution box coupled to the ceiling panel or a rotating bar coupled to the distribution box and configured to receive the sanitizer or wash-detergent mixture from distribution box and rotate or spin the sanitizer or wash-detergent mixture as a result of force being imparted to the sanitizer by the sanitizer pump or circulation pump, wherein the rotating bar is configured with nozzles for spraying the sanitizer or wash-detergent mixture. However, Fanourgiakis teaches a distribution box (distribution junction box, column 13 line 12); and a rotating bar coupled to the distribution box and configured to receive the sanitizer or wash-detergent mixture from distribution box (Figure 7 rotating bar “198” connected to distribution box “124”) and rotate or spin the sanitizer or wash-detergent mixture as a result of force being imparted to the sanitizer or wash-detergent mixture by the sanitizer pump or circulation pump (rotates whenever fluid under pressure is flowing through the plumbing, column 19 lines 51-52), wherein the rotating bar is configured with nozzles for spraying the sanitizer or wash-detergent (Figure 9 nozzles “138” on rotating bar “198”). Majdali, Metheny, and Fanourgiakis are considered analogous to the current invention as discussed above. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the sanitizing system taught by Majdali with the distribution box and rotating bar taught by Fanourgiakis teaches the distribution box ensures optimal pressure and flowrate throughout the system (column 13 liens 59-60) and Majdali teaches a rotating arm allows the cleaning solution to applied to the target at multiple angles and distances, paragraph [0059]). Regarding claim 15, the combination of Majdali and Fanourgiakis teaches wherein the UVGI system is comprised of at least one UV lamp (Figure 1 ultraviolet light source “18”, Majdali). Claims 8, 10, and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Majdali, Metheny and Fanourgiakis in view of Bacik (US 20080267819 A1). Regarding claim 8, Majdali teaches a chamber formed by a right sidewall panel, a left sidewall panel, a front sidewall panel, a read sidewall panel, a ceiling panel and a floor (Figure 2 shows a housing “52” of the sanitization system “10” defined by four walls, a top, and a bottom. The length of the housing is defined as “54” and the bottom of the housing is defined as the ride path “16”); a wash detergent container and pump, a rinse agent container and pump, a sanitizer container and pump, a circulation pump (Figure 3 storage tank “86” and pump “88”. Each nozzle may include a corresponding storage tank and pump, paragraph [0034]. Sanitization spray may include soap or anti-bacterial liquid, paragraph [0021], and water rinse, paragraph [0028]), and a dump pump (Figure 3, drain pump “96”); and a plurality of conduits configured to deliver wash detergent, rinse agent, and sanitizer to the right sidewall panel and the left sidewall panel (Figure 9 nozzles “21” on the left and right sidewalls “212” and “214”); a UVGI system for sanitizing a cart positioned within the wash and sanitization chamber (utilizes ultraviolet light to remove bacteria from surfaces, paragraph [0022]); and a controller in communication with the UVGI system (control system activates the ultraviolet light, paragraph [0037]); wherein the controller receives a sequence of at least one wash cycle, at least one rinse cycle, and/or a sanitization cycle (control system may include a process or that executes instructions stored in memory, paragraph [0039]), and automates the operation of at least one of the sanitizer pump, the circulation pump, the rotating bar, and the UVGI system based on the sequence (control system activates the ultraviolet light when vehicle is detected at a particular position, paragraph [0006]). Majdali does not teach a controller in communication with the sanitizer pump, the circulation pump, and the rotating bar; and a distribution box coupled to the ceiling panel or a distribution box coupled to the ceiling panel or a rotating bar coupled to the distribution box and configured to receive the sanitizer from distribution box and rotate or spin the sanitizer as a result of force being imparted to the sanitizer by the sanitizer pump, wherein the rotating bar is configured with nozzles for spraying the sanitizer, wherein the pumps and storage tanks are disposed above the sanitization housing or a base configured for being lifted, transported, and positioned into a stationary position by a pallet jack. While Majdali does not explicitly disclose the pumps and storage tanks disposed on the top of the sanitization housing, the rearrangement of parts will not constitute patentable subject matter (See MPEP VI (C)). Therefore, it would have been obvious to modify the sanitization housing taught by Majdali to house the storage tanks and pump on the top of the housing as opposed to the side with an expectation of providing the predictable result of successfully supplying the sanitization fluids. Metheny teaches a controller in communication with the sanitizer pump and the circulation pump (controller produces a sequence of wash, rinse, germicidal application and dry phase, paragraph [0015], and controller operates the pump, paragraph [0041]). Metheny does not teach a distribution box coupled to the ceiling panel or a rotating bar coupled to the distribution box and configured to receive the sanitizer from distribution box and rotate or spin the sanitizer as a result of force being imparted to the sanitizer by the sanitizer pump, wherein the rotating bar is configured with nozzles for spraying the sanitizer or a base configured for being lifted, transported, and positioned into a stationary position by a pallet jack. Majdali and Metheny are considered analogous to the current invention because all are in the field of cart sanitizing and washing systems. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the sanitizing system with combined sequence of washing and sanitizing taught by Metheny because Metheny teaches it is beneficial to both a consumer and a company to eliminate as much contamination as possible from a shopping cart (paragraphs [0003]-[0006]). Fanourgiakis teaches a distribution box (distribution junction box, column 13 line 12); and a rotating bar coupled to the distribution box and configured to receive the sanitizer from distribution box (Figure 7 rotating bar “198” connected to distribution box “124”) and rotate or spin the sanitizer as a result of force being imparted to the sanitizer by the sanitizer pump (rotates whenever fluid under pressure is flowing through the plumbing, column 19 lines 51-52), wherein the rotating bar is configured with nozzles for spraying the sanitizer (Figure 9 nozzles “138” on rotating bar “198”). Fanourgiakis does not teach a base configured for being lifted, transported, and positioned into a stationary position by a pallet jack. Majdali and Fanourgiakis are considered analogous to the current invention as discussed above. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the sanitizing system taught by Majdali with the distribution box and rotating bar taught by Fanourgiakis teaches the distribution box ensures optimal pressure and flowrate throughout the system (column 13 liens 59-60) and Majdali teaches a rotating arm allows the cleaning solution to applied to the target at multiple angles and distances, paragraph [0059]). Bacik teaches a decontamination unit configured with a base that includes lifting brackets to be moved with a forklift or pallet jack (paragraph [0019]). Majdali and Bacik are considered analogous to the current invention because all are in field of decontamination chambers for large items. Additionally, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the sanitization system taught by Majdali with the portable base configuration taught by Bacik because Majdali teaches that a transportable base allows the ride vehicle to be exposed to the cleaning cycle for a suitable amount of time to remove undesirable substance (paragraph [0052]). Regarding claim 10, the combination of Majdali, Metheny, Fanourgiakis, and Bacik teaches all aspects of the current invention as discussed above including entrance and exit doors through which a cart enters and exits the sanitization chamber (Figure 2 first access door “62” and second access door “60”, Majdali). Regarding claim 16, the combination of Majdali, Metheny, and Fanourgiakis teaches all aspects of the current invention except a base configured for being lifted, transported, and positioned into a stationary position by a pallet jack. However, Bacik teaches a decontamination unit configured with a base that includes lifting brackets to be moved with a forklift or pallet jack (paragraph [0019]). Majdali, Metheny, Fanourgiakis, and Bacik are considered analogous to the current invention as discussed above. Additionally, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the sanitization system taught by Majdali, Metheny, and Fanourgiakis with the portable base configuration taught by Bacik because Majdali teaches that a transportable base allows the ride vehicle to be exposed to the cleaning cycle for a suitable amount of time to remove undesirable substance (paragraph [0052]). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAYLA ROSE SARANTAKOS whose telephone number is (703)756-5524. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 7:00-4:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Marcheschi can be reached at (571) 272-1374. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /K.R.S./Examiner, Art Unit 1799 /DONALD R SPAMER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1799
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 23, 2021
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 08, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 21, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jul 23, 2025
Interview Requested
Jul 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 31, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 22, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 26, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 02, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 16, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 23, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589177
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MOLD AND MYCOTOXIN REMEDIATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582735
DISINFECTION METHOD COMPRISING A DISINFECTANT FORMED BY REACTION OF H2O2 AND NO2 IN SITU WITH RETARDED RELEASE OF THE ACTIVE SUBSTANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12521456
Disinfection Device For Female Connectors
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12515838
RETORT SYSTEM AND PROCESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12474072
Microbial Control on High-Touch Surfaces in Health Care Facilities
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 18, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
31%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+51.0%)
3y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 61 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month