Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/590,888

MULTILAYER COIL COMPONENT

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Feb 02, 2022
Examiner
LIAN, MANG TIN BIK
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
TDK Corporation
OA Round
4 (Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
921 granted / 1312 resolved
+2.2% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
82 currently pending
Career history
1394
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.4%
+13.4% vs TC avg
§102
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
§112
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1312 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-2, 7, 9-12 and 14-15, 17-18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Arai (U.S. PG. Pub. No. 2021/0065951 A1) in view of Aoki et al. (U.S. PG. Pub. No. 2018/0342341 A1). With respect to claim 1, Arai teaches a multilayer coil component 1 (Figs. 1-5C) comprising: an element body 10 including a plurality of insulator layers 11-11h (Fig. 3) that are laminated (“lamination structure” para. [0046]); a coil 25 disposed in the element body; and a pair of external terminals 23 and 24 electrically connected to the coil, wherein the element body has a rectangular parallelepiped shape and includes a pair of main surfaces (top and bottom surface) opposing each other in a first direction (T direction) a pair of end surfaces (left and right surfaces) opposing each other in a second direction (L direction) intersecting with the first direction, and a pair of side surfaces (front and back surfaces) opposing each other in a third direction (W direction) intersecting with the first direction and the second direction, the pair of external terminals are separated from each other in the second direction and are embedded in the element body apart from the pair of end surfaces and the pair of side surfaces, each of the pair of external terminals includes an exposed surface 24i (annotated Fig. 1) exposed from one of the main surfaces (bottom surface) and an inner surface 23i disposed in the element body (Fig. 3) (paras. [0025], [0046]-[0047] and [0071]). PNG media_image1.png 537 562 media_image1.png Greyscale Arai does not expressly teach the exposed surface is formed of a single piece, each of the pair of external terminals includes a plurality of electrode layers that are laminated, and the plurality of electrode layers are laminated and arranged such that electrode layers having different heights in the first direction are adjacent to each other, so as to form alternating depressions and protrusions on the inner surface. Aoki et al., hereinafter referred to as “Aoki,” teaches a coil component 1 (Figs. 1-4), wherein the exposed surface (lower surface of conductor portion 31) is formed of a single piece, each of the pair of external terminals 3 includes a plurality of electrode layers 13b-13g that are laminated, and the plurality of electrode layers are laminated and arranged such that electrode layers having different heights (heights of depressions 21a and protrusions 21b from the exposed surface, annotated Fig. 3A) in the first direction D3 are adjacent to each other, so as to form alternating depressions 31a and protrusions 31b on the inner surface (upper surface of conductor portion 31) (para. [0031]). PNG media_image2.png 320 478 media_image2.png Greyscale It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have the electrode layers having depressions and protrusions as taught by Aoki to the coil component of Arai to provide steps between the electrode layers and the element body to increase adhesion area, thereby improving adhesion between the external terminals and the element body (para. 0074]). With respect to claim 2, Arai in view of Aoki teaches the multilayer coil component according to claim 1, wherein the inner surface includes an opposing surface (upper surface) opposing the exposed surface and a connecting surface (side surface) connecting the exposed surface and the opposing surface, and the connecting surface includes the depressions or the protrusions (Arai, para. [0047], Aoki, para. [0031]). With respect to claim 7, Arai in view of Aoki teaches the multilayer coil component according to claim 1, wherein the inner surface includes an opposing surface (upper surface) opposing the exposed surface, and the opposing surface includes the depressions or the protrusions (Arai, para. [0047], Aoki, paras. [0031]). With respect to claim 9, Arai in view of Aoki teaches the multilayer coil component according to claim 1, wherein each of the pair of external terminals includes a plurality of electrode layers (Arai, L1a-L1f and L2a-L2f, or Aoki, 13b-13) that are laminated (Arai, para. [0047], Aoki, para. [0031]). With respect to claim 10, Arai in view of Aoki teaches the multilayer coil component according to claim 9, wherein the plurality of electrode layers 33a and 33b, and 43a and 43b are laminated in such a way that electrode layers having different sizes when viewed from a lamination direction are adjacent to each other (Aoki, para. [0031]). With respect to claim 11, Arai in view of Aok teaches the multilayer coil component according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of insulator layers that are laminated in the second direction or in the third direction (Arai, para. [0046]). With respect to claim 12, Arai in view of Aoki teaches the multilayer coil component according to claim 3, wherein the plurality of insulator layers that are laminated in the third direction (Arai, para. [0046]). With respect to claim 14, Arai teaches a multilayer coil component 1 (Figs. 1-5C) comprising: an element body 10 including a plurality of insulator layers 11-11h (Fig. 3) that are laminated (“lamination structure” para. [0046]); a coil 25 disposed in the element body; and a pair of external terminals 23 and 24 electrically connected to the coil, wherein the element body has a rectangular parallelepiped shape and includes a pair of main surfaces (top and bottom surface) opposing each other in a first direction (T direction) a pair of end surfaces (left and right surfaces) opposing each other in a second direction (L direction) intersecting with the first direction, and a pair of side surfaces (front and back surfaces) opposing each other in a third direction (W direction) intersecting with the first direction and the second direction, the pair of external terminals are separated from each other in the second direction and are embedded in the element body apart from the pair of end surfaces and the pair of side surfaces, each of the pair of external terminals includes an exposed surface 24i (annotated Fig. 1 above) exposed from one of the main surfaces (bottom surface) and an inner surface 23i disposed in the element bod (paras. [0025], [0046]-[0047] and [0071]). Arai does not expressly teach the exposed surface does not include an unevenness, each of the pair of external terminals includes a plurality of electrode layers that are laminated, and the plurality of electrode layers are laminated and arranged such that electrode layers having different heights in the first direction are adjacent to each other, so as to form alternating depressions and protrusions on the inner surface. Aoki teaches a coil component 1 (Figs. 1-4), wherein the exposed surface (lower surface of conductor portion 31) does not include an unevenness, each of the pair of external terminals 3 includes a plurality of electrode layers 13b-13g that are laminated, and the plurality of electrode layers are laminated and arranged such that electrode layers having different heights (heights of depressions 21a and protrusions 21b from the exposed surface, annotated Fig. 3A) in the first direction D3 are adjacent to each other, so as to form alternating depressions 31a and protrusions 31b on the inner surface (upper surface of conductor portion 31) (para. [0031]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have the electrode layers having depressions and protrusions as taught by Aoki to the coil component of Arai to provide steps between the electrode layers and the element body to increase adhesion area, thereby improving adhesion between the external terminals and the element body (para. 0074]). With respect to claim 15, Arai in view of Aoki teaches the multilayer coil component according to claim 14, wherein the inner surface includes an opposing surface (upper surface) opposing the exposed surface and a connecting surface (side surface) connecting the exposed surface and the opposing surface, and the connecting surface includes the depression or the protrusion (Arai, para. [0047], Aoki, para. [0031]). With respect to claim 17, Arai teaches a multilayer coil component 1 (Figs. 1-5C) comprising: an element body 10 including a plurality of insulator layers 11-11h (Fig. 3) that are laminated (“lamination structure” para. [0046]); a coil 25 disposed in the element body; and a pair of external terminals 23 and 24 electrically connected to the coil, wherein the element body has a rectangular parallelepiped shape and includes a pair of main surfaces (top and bottom surface) opposing each other in a first direction (T direction) a pair of end surfaces (left and right surfaces) opposing each other in a second direction (L direction) intersecting with the first direction, and a pair of side surfaces (front and back surfaces) opposing each other in a third direction (W direction) intersecting with the first direction and the second direction, the pair of external terminals are separated from each other in the second direction and are embedded in the element body apart from the pair of end surfaces and the pair of side surfaces, each of the pair of external terminals includes an exposed surface 24i (annotated Fig. 1) exposed from one of the main surfaces (bottom surface) and an inner surface 23i disposed in the element body (Fig. 3) (paras. [0025], [0046]-[0047] and [0071]). Arai does not expressly teach each of the pair of external terminals includes a plurality of electrode layers that are laminated and directly connected to each other without vias. each of the pair of external terminals includes a plurality of electrode layers that are laminated, and the plurality of electrode layers are laminated and arranged such that electrode layers having different heights in the first direction are adjacent to each other, so as to form alternating depressions and protrusions on the inner surface. Aoki teaches a coil component 1 (Figs. 1-4), wherein each of the pair of external terminals includes a plurality of electrode layers 13b-13g that are laminated and directly connected to each other without vias. the exposed surface (lower surface of conductor portion 31) does not include an unevenness, each of the pair of external terminals 3 includes a plurality of electrode layers that are laminated, and the plurality of electrode layers are laminated and arranged such that electrode layers having different heights (heights of depressions 21a and protrusions 21b from the exposed surface, annotated Fig. 3A) in the first direction D3 are adjacent to each other, so as to form alternating depressions 31a and protrusions 31b on the inner surface (upper surface of conductor portion 31) (para. [0031]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have the electrode layers as taught by Aoki to the coil component of Arai to provide steps between the electrode layers and the element body to increase adhesion area, thereby improving adhesion between the external terminals and the element body (para. 0074]). With respect to claim 18, Arai in view of Aoki teaches the multilayer coil component according to claim 17, wherein the inner surface includes an opposing surface (upper surface) opposing the exposed surface and a connecting surface (side surface) connecting the exposed surface and the opposing surface, and the connecting surface includes the depression or the protrusion (Arai, para. [0047], Aoki, para. [0031]). With respect to claim 20, Arai in view of Aoki teaches the multilayer coil component according to claim 1, wherein the coil includes a plurality of coil conductors that are connected to each other without vias (Aoki, para. [0031]). Claims 3, 16 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Arai in view of Aoki, as applied to claims 2, 15 and 18 above, and further in view of Tobita et al. (U.S. PG. Pub. No. 2019/0348214 A1). With respect to claims 3, 16, and 19, Arai in view of Aoki teaches the multilayer coil component according to claims 2, 15 and 18, respectively, wherein the connecting surface includes a pair of first connecting surfaces 24c2 and 24c3 opposing each other in the second direction (Arai, para. [0047]). Arai in view of Shimoda does not expressly teach each of the pair of first connecting surfaces includes the depression or the protrusion. Tobita et al., hereinafter referred to as “Tobita,” teaches a multilayer coil component (Fig. 7B), wherein each of the pair of first connecting surfaces 34a1 and 34a2 (annotated Fig. 7B) includes the depression 34a or the protrusion 24a3 and 34a4 (para. [0070]). PNG media_image3.png 230 494 media_image3.png Greyscale \ It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have the connecting surfaces having depression and or protrusion as taught by Tobita to the multilayer coil component of Arai in view of Aoki to control a decrease in a Q-value since it’s possible to reduce loss due to an eddy current by providing depression in the external terminals (para. [0008]). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MANGTIN LIAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5729. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 0800-1700. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki S. Ismail can be reached at 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MANG TIN BIK LIAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 02, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 30, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 30, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 05, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 30, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Aug 21, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 02, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 23, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 09, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603211
COIL COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597557
Dry High Voltage Instrument Transformer
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597554
ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597556
TRANSFORMER DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586715
Coil Component
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+26.4%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1312 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month