Office Action Predictor
Application No. 17/591,297

ULTRAVIOLET DETECTION MATERIAL

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 02, 2022
Examiner
YOO, REGINA M
Art Unit
1758
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Shinko Electric Industries Co., LTD.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

64%
Career Allow Rate
560 granted / 882 resolved
Without
With
+14.1%
Interview Lift
avg trend
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
62 pending
944
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
35.7%
-4.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
34.6%
-5.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Response to Amendment The amendment filed on 12/01/2025 has been received and claims 1-7 and 11-14 are pending. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/01/2025 has been entered. Claim Objections The numbering of claims is not in accordance with 37 CFR 1.126 which requires the original numbering of the claims to be preserved throughout the prosecution. When claims are canceled, the remaining claims must not be renumbered. When new claims are presented, they must be numbered consecutively beginning with the number next following the highest numbered claims previously presented (whether entered or not). Misnumbered cancelled claim 12 been renumbered as claim 10 . Claims 1-7 and 11-14 are objected to because of the following informalities: in line 4 of Claim 1, insert --and-- before “lanthanum”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-7 and 11-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Specifically, in claim 1 there is no written description support for the limitation that the “plurality of types of oxides” also consists of “strontium carbonate” within the Specification. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-7 and 11-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In Claim 1, it is not clear how “a plurality of types of oxides” includes/consists of “strontium carbonate” as it is not an oxide. In Claim 13, it is not clear whether “the composite oxide is formed by dry-mixing [only] powders of the plurality of types of oxides, sintering [only] the powders of the plurality of types of oxides” as strontium carbonate is not an oxide but is utilized for dry-mixing then sintering to form the resulting composite oxide. Claims 2-7, 11-12 and 14 are rejected due to their dependence on a rejected claim. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-7 and 11-14 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REGINA M YOO whose telephone number is (571)272-6690. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9:00 am - 5:00 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Maris Kessel can be reached at (571)270-7698. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /REGINA M YOO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1758
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 02, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jun 13, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 27, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Oct 22, 2025
Interview Requested
Oct 30, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 30, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 01, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Mar 25, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12551585
Sanitizing Appliance
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12544471
VEHICLE SANITIZING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12544466
Instrument Sterilization Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12544473
Medical Instrument Sterilization Case Tracking
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12521464
AIR DISINFECTION APPARATUS FOR USE IN AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+14.1%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 882 resolved cases by this examiner