Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/592,406

CHARGE/DISCHARGE MANAGEMENT IN ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS, INCLUDING PARTIAL CYCLE CONTROL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 03, 2022
Examiner
NGO, BRIAN
Art Unit
2851
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sion Power Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
851 granted / 967 resolved
+20.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
991
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
§103
36.9%
-3.1% vs TC avg
§102
38.3%
-1.7% vs TC avg
§112
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 967 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This Non-Final office is a response to the papers filed on 12/10/2025. Claims 54-59, 61, and 280-303 are pending, claims 62-279 are cancelled. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments file on 12/10/2025 have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 54-59, 61, 280-303 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chiang et al. (US 2011/0042204 A1) in view of Wilkening at al, (Pub. No. 20110059361 A1). Regarding claims 54, 55, 280, 281, 284, 286, 287, and 290, Chiang discloses: An electrochemical cell management system comprising: an electrochemical cell (see par [0008-0009], comprising at least one electrochemical cell comprising a negative electrode and a positive electrode….); and at least one controller configured to (see par [0110-0114], the pumping rate can be varied widely by controlling the discharge rate of the electrochemical cell. In some embodiments, the discharge rate can be remotely controlled…..): monitor at least one morphological characteristic of the electrochemical cell indicating a loss of lithium in the electrochemical cell (see par [0163], the loss of lithium may result in a small stress as well, but this stress is much less than that of the positive electrode since lithium is highly ductile near room temperature. Thus, the entire cell undergoes flexure due to the volume change of the tin layer on the electrochemical actuator comprising the positive electrode. Flexure of the cell in turn applies a pressure to a drug reservoir…., see par [0110]); and based on the at least one monitored morphological characteristic of the electrochemical cell, control a charging rate or a discharging rate of the electrochemical cell (see par [0110-0114], which can in turn be controlled through the discharge rate of the electrochemical cell. Control of discharge can be performed by various methods such as by varying the resistance of an external circuit through which the cell discharges. External controls can include, for example, a resistor….) such that the discharging rate is increased with respect to the charging rate (see par [0178], a higher average discharge voltage than that for the preceding examples utilizing tin and lithium metal may be desirable…., see par [0110-0114]). However, Chiang fails to disclose: an electrochemical cell that is part of a stack of electrochemical cells; wherein the electrochemical cell management system is configured such that an anisotropic force is applied to the stack across faces of the electrochemical cells in the stack, the anisotropic force having a component perpendicular to an electrode surface of the electrochemical cell. Thus, Wilkening discloses: an electrochemical cell that is part of a stack of electrochemical cells, (see Fig. 1, see par [0100], FIG. 1 illustrates an electrochemical cell arranged in a stacked configuration….); wherein the electrochemical cell management system is configured such that an anisotropic force is applied to the stack across faces of the electrochemical cells in the stack (see par [0116-0120], while an anisotropic force is applied to the electrochemical cell (e.g., during charge and/or discharge of the cell). The magnitude of the anisotropic force may lie within any of the ranges mentioned below…..), the anisotropic force having a component perpendicular to an electrode surface of the electrochemical cell (see par [0119-0120], force which at least in part exerts itself in a direction substantially perpendicular to the surface….). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have modified actuator systems of Chiang to include an electrochemical cell that is part of a stack of electrochemical cells in order to achieving enhanced performance (see Wilkening par [0102]). Regarding claim 56, 280, 281, and 288, Chiang discloses: wherein the at least one morphological characteristic indicates a parasitic reaction between the lithium in the electrochemical cell and at least one other material in the electrochemical cell (see par [0110], which can in turn be controlled through the discharge rate of the electrochemical cell. Control of discharge can be performed by various methods such as by varying the resistance of an external circuit through which the cell discharges. External controls can include, for example, a resistor….). Regarding claim 57, 282, and 289, Chiang discloses: wherein the at least one other material in the electrochemical cell comprises part of an electrolyte of the electrochemical cell or part of a counter electrode of the electrochemical cell (see par [0123], Several types of materials can be used in actuators of the invention. For example, titanium metal may be used as an electrode material when the species is hydrogen, since titanium metal is a very good hydrogen absorption medium. Other suitable hydrogen absorption media include noble metals….). Regarding claims 58, 280, 281, Chiang discloses: wherein the electrochemical cell comprises metallic lithium at least one point during discharge of the electrochemical cell (see par [0132-0133], a high underpotential applied during discharge may reach potentials at which anode current collectors (such as copper) dissolve, or this may cause metallic lithium may be plated….). Regarding claims 59, 283, Chiang discloses: wherein the loss of lithium in the electrochemical cell comprises a loss of metallic lithium in the electrochemical cell (see par [0082], due to the loss of lithium metal from the negative electrode and formation of lithium intercalated compound or lithium alloy at the positive electrode…). Regarding claims 61, 285, and 291, Chiang discloses: wherein the at least one morphological characteristic of the electrochemical cell comprises a value or change in at least one of: pressure, thickness, volume, deflection, conductivity, resistance, or temperature (see par [0110-0114], which can in turn be controlled through the discharge rate of the electrochemical cell. Control of discharge can be performed by various methods such as by varying the resistance …). Regarding claim 292, 295, 297, and 300, Wilkening discloses: wherein the component of the anisotropic force normal to the electrode surface defines a pressure of at least 4.9 Newtons per square centimeter (see par [0093], n some cases, while an anisotropic force (e.g., defining a pressure of between about 4.9 Newtons/cm.sup.2 and about 198 Newtons/cm.sup.2, or any of the ranges outlined below) is applied to the electrochemical cell…). Regarding claim 293 and 298, Wilkening discloses: wherein the component of the anisotropic force normal to the electrode surface defines a pressure of at least 9.8 Newtons per square centimeter (see par [0124], of the anisotropic force normal to the anode active surface may, for example, define a pressure of at least about 4.9, at least about 9.8, at least about 24.5, at least about 49, at least about 78, at least about 98, at least about 117.6, at least about 147, at least about 175, at least about 200, at least about 225, or at least about 250 Newtons per square centimeter…). Regarding claim 294 and 299, Wilkening discloses: wherein a facial surface of an electrode of the electrochemical cell is substantially parallel to a corresponding facial surface of each corresponding electrode in each other electrochemical cell in the stack (see Fig. 1, see par [0100], While FIG. 1 illustrates an electrochemical cell arranged in a stacked configuration….). Regarding claim 296 and 301, Wilkening discloses: wherein the electrochemical cell is configured to provide power to a drive train of the vehicle (see par [0027], The porous structures described herein can be used in electrochemical cells for a wide variety of devices, such as, for example, electric vehicles,….). Regarding claim 302, Wilkening discloses: wherein at least about 50% of an area of an external surface of the electrochemical cell defines a uniform area, and any continuous area that covers 10% of the uniform area includes an average pressure that varies by less than about 25% relative to the average pressure across the entirety of the uniform area (see par [0057, 0061-0065], par [0115]). Regarding claim 303, Wilkening discloses: wherein at least about 95% of an area of an external surface of the electrochemical cell defines a uniform area, and any continuous area that covers 10% of the uniform area includes an average pressure that varies by less than about 25% relative to the average pressure across the entirety of the uniform area (see par [0057, 0061-0065], par [0115]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN NGO whose telephone number is (571)270-7011. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jack Chiang can be reached at 5712727483. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN NGO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2851
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 03, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
May 19, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
May 19, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 28, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 05, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 10, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 04, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 16, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 16, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597786
HIGH VOLTAGE ISOLATION USING DISCRETE NON-ISOLATED DEVICES AND ELECTRICALLY ISOLATING, THERMALLY CONDUCTIVE SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12580390
UNDER-FLOOR CHARGING STATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581614
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AN AUTOMATIC BATTERY HEAT SINKING OPERATION CONTROL MECHANISM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572834
NUCLEAR SPIN WAVE QUANTUM REGISTER FOR SOLID STATE QUANTUM NETWORK NODES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567768
WIRELESS CHARGING SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+12.2%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 967 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month