Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/593,465

NETWORK BASED OPERATIONS FOR SUPER-SLOT BASED DATA TRANSMISSION

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Sep 19, 2021
Priority
Sep 18, 2020 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2020116154
Examiner
BEHARRY, NOEL R
Art Unit
2416
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
4 (Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allowance Rate
168 granted / 302 resolved
-2.4% vs TC avg
Strong +44% interview lift
Without
With
+43.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 5m
Avg Prosecution
5 currently pending
Career history
324
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
85.4%
+45.4% vs TC avg
§102
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
§112
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 302 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 10/21/2024 has been entered. Claims 1, 3, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 25, 27 are amended; Claims 2, 5, 6, 12, 15, 17 – 24, 26 are cancelled; No claims are added. Claims 1, 3, 4, 7 – 11, 13, 14, 16, 25, 27 are currently pending and subject to examination. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1 – 4, 7 – 14, 16, 25 - 27 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Objections Claims 8, 9, 10 are objected to because of the following informalities: Regarding claim 8, claim 8 recites the limitation “wherein the wherein the“ in lines 1 – 2. It would appear that the Applicant meant to recite --- Claims 9, 10 are objected to because they depend from a claim which has been objected. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1, 3, 4, 7 – 9, 11, 13, 14, 16, 25, 27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shi et al. (US 20230007651 A1) in view of Moon et al. (US 20250062866 A1). Regarding claim 1, Shi et al. discloses one or more processors (Shi et al., FIG. 2, processors 221) configured to perform operations comprising: indicating a resource allocation for a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) transmission (Shi et al., [0028] a network base station may send a radio resource control (RRC) to a user equipment, so that the RRC may include information to configure a time domain resource allocation (TDRA) type corresponding to a TDRA table), wherein the PDSCH transmission includes mapping modulated symbols of a transport block (Shi et al., [0044] with the TDRA index as 1, the TDRA may include the repeating of a TB on 0-1, 2-3, 3-4, and 4-5 symbols in the first slot after the corresponding UL grant with the mapping type B) across resource elements for N consecutive slots of the resource allocation, wherein N is at least two (Shi et al., [0048] the TDRA may include TB1 on 7-13 symbols of the first slot after the corresponding UL grant with the mapping type B, TB2 on 0-6 symbols of the second slot after the corresponding UL grant with the mapping type A, TB3 on 7-13 symbols of the second slot after the corresponding UL grant with the mapping type B, and TB4 on 0-6 symbols of the third slot after the corresponding UL grant with the mapping type A); and generating, for transmission to a user equipment (Shi et al., FIG. 3, UE 300), a downlink control information (DCI) transmission including a time domain resource allocation (TDRA) value (Shi et al., [0035] receiving, by the user equipment, a radio resource control (RRC), the RRC configuring a TDRA type corresponding to a TDRA table, where the RRC may be sent by a gNB to the user equipment and there may be a set of TDRA types, where each TDRA type may be configured based on a corresponding TDRA table in relation to [0040] receiving, by the user equipment, a downlink control information (DCI) from the network base station, where the DCI may include an index corresponding to an entry index in the TDRA table) corresponding to the N consecutive slots of the resource allocation (Shi et al., [0036] the set of TDRA types may be a set X, and the set X may include {type I RRC, type II RRC, type III RRC} and the TDRA table may correspond to each type in the set X, where the type I RRC may refer to a URLLC mode and the corresponding TDRA table include a column of repetition numbers), wherein the TDRA value provides a row index corresponding to a slot offset and multiple start and length indicator values (SLIVs) for the PDSCH (Shi et al., [0038] the TDRA table may include a plurality of entries in relation to [0039] the TDRA table may include a plurality of columns, including a TDRA index, a K2 (offset), a pair of start and length values (S, L), a mapping type, and a repetition number and [0040] the TDRA index may indicate an index of each entry in the TDRA table to include a range beginning at 0 and ending at (N−1), where N is the number of entries in the TDRA table). Shi et al. does not expressly disclose a single dedicated hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) process number across resource elements for N consecutive slots of the resource allocation. Moon et al., for example from an analogous field of endeavor (Moon et al., [0087] data that a base station or the terminal desires to transmit may be managed in units of a transport block (TB) or a medium access control (MAC) protocol data unit (PDU) by each HARQ process, where in DL the TB or MAC PDU may include a downlink shared channel (DL-SCH) and/or a MAC control element (CE) and in UL the TB or MAC PDU may include an uplink shared channel (UL-SCH), a MAC CE, and/or physical layer control information (UCI), the data channel may include a DL data channel, PDSCH, PUSCH, and a PSSCH) discloses a single dedicated hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) process number across resource elements for N consecutive slots of the resource allocation (Moon et al., [0090] instances constituting repetitive transmission of the data channel may correspond to the same HARQ process and may include coded data for the same TB(s), where repetitive transmission of a data channel may mean repetitive transmission for the same HARQ process and the same TB(s)). Thus, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention to combine a single dedicated hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) process number across resource elements for N consecutive slots of the resource allocation as taught by Moon et al. with the system of Shi et al. in order to perform repetitive transmission in a plurality of slots (Moon et al., [0091]). Regarding claims 3, 13, 27, Shi et al. – Moon et al. disclose mapping the modulated symbols of the transport block across the resource elements of the N consecutive slots (Moon et al., [0091] each data channel instance may be mapped to contiguous symbol(s) in the time domain). The motivation is the same as in claim 1. Regarding claims 4, 14, Shi et al. – Moon et al. disclose the modulated symbols are mapped sequentially to the resource elements in increasing order of i) first in frequency and then in time or ii) first in time and then in frequency (Moon et al., [0091] each data channel instance may be mapped to contiguous symbol(s) in the time domain). The motivation is the same as in claim 1. Regarding claims 7, 16, Shi et al. – Moon et al. disclose indicating a value of N to the UE to be used for the PDSCH transmission, wherein N is either one of signaled to the UE in a system information block (Moon et al., [0091] the position of the first symbol of the DM-RS for demodulating the PUSCH may be semi-statically configured by RRC signaling, master information block (MIB) or cell-specific RRC signaling) or ii) signaled to the UE using dedicated radio resource control (RRC) signaling (Shi et al., [0040] receiving, by the user equipment, a downlink control information (DCI) from the network base station, where the DCI may include an index corresponding to an entry index in the TDRA table). The motivation is the same as in claim 1. Regarding claim 8, Shi et al. – Moon et al. disclose the TDRA value further indicates a starting symbol S0 and a number of symbols L (Shi et al., [0042] the pair of start and length values (S, L) may indicate a starting symbol (S) in the slot indicated by the K2 (offset) of the transport block (TB) and a length (L) of symbols or the column may include a pair of start and length indicators, including an S indicator and an L indicator respectively), wherein either one or both of the starting symbol S or the number of symbols L is scaled by a scaling factor (Shi et al., [0058] when the type I RRC includes PUSCH-TimeDomainResourceAllocationList-ForDCIformat0_2, a PUSCH transmission mode may be in URLLC mode with the repetition number in the configured TDRA). Regarding claim 9, Shi et al. – Moon et al. disclose configuring a value of the scaling factor for the UE to use via higher layer signaling and based on a traffic type for the PDSCH transmission (Shi et al., [0058] when the type II RRC includes pusch-TimeDomainAllocationList-r16, a PUSCH transmission mode may be in the NR-U mode with multiple TTI and when the type III RRC includes pusch-TimeDomainAllocationList, a PUSCH transmission mode may be in a traditional NR mode, which may not support dynamic repetition or multiple TTIs). Regarding claim 11, Shi et al. discloses a base station (Shi et al., FIG. 2, gNB 200), comprising: a transceiver (Shi et al., FIG. 2, Tx/Rx circuitry 208) configured to connect to a user equipment (UE) (Shi et al., FIG. 3, UE 300); and one or more processors (Shi et al., FIG. 2, processors 221) configured to perform operations comprising: generating, for transmission, a resource allocation for a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) transmission between the UE and the base station (Shi et al., [0028] a network base station may send a radio resource control (RRC) to a user equipment, so that the RRC may include information to configure a time domain resource allocation (TDRA) type corresponding to a TDRA table), wherein the PDSCH transmission includes mapping modulated symbols of a transport block (Shi et al., [0044] with the TDRA index as 1, the TDRA may include the repeating of a TB on 0-1, 2-3, 3-4, and 4-5 symbols in the first slot after the corresponding UL grant with the mapping type B) across resource elements for N consecutive slots of the resource allocation, wherein N is at least two (Shi et al., [0048] the TDRA may include TB1 on 7-13 symbols of the first slot after the corresponding UL grant with the mapping type B, TB2 on 0-6 symbols of the second slot after the corresponding UL grant with the mapping type A, TB3 on 7-13 symbols of the second slot after the corresponding UL grant with the mapping type B, and TB4 on 0-6 symbols of the third slot after the corresponding UL grant with the mapping type A); and generating, for transmission to the UE, a downlink control information (DCI) transmission including a time domain resource allocation (TDRA) value (Shi et al., [0035] receiving, by the user equipment, a radio resource control (RRC), the RRC configuring a TDRA type corresponding to a TDRA table, where the RRC may be sent by a gNB to the user equipment and there may be a set of TDRA types, where each TDRA type may be configured based on a corresponding TDRA table in relation to [0040] receiving, by the user equipment, a downlink control information (DCI) from the network base station, where the DCI may include an index corresponding to an entry index in the TDRA table) corresponding to the N consecutive slots of the resource allocation (Shi et al., [0036] the set of TDRA types may be a set X, and the set X may include {type I RRC, type II RRC, type III RRC} and the TDRA table may correspond to each type in the set X, where the type I RRC may refer to a URLLC mode and the corresponding TDRA table include a column of repetition numbers), wherein the TDRA value provides a row index corresponding to a slot offset and multiple start and length indicator values (SLIVs) for the PDSCH (Shi et al., [0038] the TDRA table may include a plurality of entries in relation to [0039] the TDRA table may include a plurality of columns, including a TDRA index, a K2 (offset), a pair of start and length values (S, L), a mapping type, and a repetition number and [0040] the TDRA index may indicate an index of each entry in the TDRA table to include a range beginning at 0 and ending at (N−1), where N is the number of entries in the TDRA table). Shi et al. does not expressly disclose a single dedicated hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) process number across resource elements for N consecutive slots of the resource allocation. Moon et al., for example from an analogous field of endeavor (Moon et al., [0087] Data that a base station or the terminal desires to transmit may be managed in units of a transport block (TB) or a medium access control (MAC) protocol data unit (PDU) by each HARQ process, where in DL the TB or MAC PDU may include a downlink shared channel (DL-SCH) and/or a MAC control element (CE) and in UL the TB or MAC PDU may include an uplink shared channel (UL-SCH), a MAC CE, and/or physical layer control information (UCI), the data channel may include a DL data channel, PDSCH, PUSCH, and a PSSCH) discloses a single dedicated hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) process number across resource elements for N consecutive slots of the resource allocation (Moon et al., [0090] instances constituting repetitive transmission of the data channel may correspond to the same HARQ process and may include coded data for the same TB(s), where repetitive transmission of a data channel may mean repetitive transmission for the same HARQ process and the same TB(s)). Thus, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention to combine a single dedicated hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) process number across resource elements for N consecutive slots of the resource allocation as taught by Moon et al. with the system of Shi et al. in order to perform repetitive transmission in a plurality of slots (Moon et al., [0091]). Regarding claim 25, Shi et al. discloses a method performed by a base station (Shi et al., FIG. 2, gNB 200), comprising: indicating a resource allocation for a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) transmission (Shi et al., [0028] a network base station may send a radio resource control (RRC) to a user equipment, so that the RRC may include information to configure a time domain resource allocation (TDRA) type corresponding to a TDRA table), wherein the PDSCH transmission includes mapping modulated symbols of a transport block (Shi et al., [0044] with the TDRA index as 1, the TDRA may include the repeating of a TB on 0-1, 2-3, 3-4, and 4-5 symbols in the first slot after the corresponding UL grant with the mapping type B) across resource elements for N consecutive slots of the resource allocation, wherein N is at least two (Shi et al., [0048] the TDRA may include TB1 on 7-13 symbols of the first slot after the corresponding UL grant with the mapping type B, TB2 on 0-6 symbols of the second slot after the corresponding UL grant with the mapping type A, TB3 on 7-13 symbols of the second slot after the corresponding UL grant with the mapping type B, and TB4 on 0-6 symbols of the third slot after the corresponding UL grant with the mapping type A); and transmitting a downlink control information (DCI) transmission to a user equipment (UE) (Shi et al., FIG. 3, UE 300) including a time domain resource allocation (TDRA) value (Shi et al., [0035] receiving, by the user equipment, a radio resource control (RRC), the RRC configuring a TDRA type corresponding to a TDRA table, where the RRC may be sent by a gNB to the user equipment and there may be a set of TDRA types, where each TDRA type may be configured based on a corresponding TDRA table in relation to [0040] receiving, by the user equipment, a downlink control information (DCI) from the network base station, where the DCI may include an index corresponding to an entry index in the TDRA table) corresponding to the N consecutive slots of the resource allocation (Shi et al., [0036] the set of TDRA types may be a set X, and the set X may include {type I RRC, type II RRC, type III RRC} and the TDRA table may correspond to each type in the set X, where the type I RRC may refer to a URLLC mode and the corresponding TDRA table include a column of repetition numbers), wherein the TDRA value provides a row index corresponding to a slot offset and multiple start and length indicator values (SLIVs) for the PDSCH (Shi et al., [0038] the TDRA table may include a plurality of entries in relation to [0039] the TDRA table may include a plurality of columns, including a TDRA index, a K2 (offset), a pair of start and length values (S, L), a mapping type, and a repetition number and [0040] the TDRA index may indicate an index of each entry in the TDRA table to include a range beginning at 0 and ending at (N−1), where N is the number of entries in the TDRA table). Shi et al. does not expressly disclose a single dedicated hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) process number across resource elements for N consecutive slots of the resource allocation. Moon et al., for example from an analogous field of endeavor (Moon et al., [0087] Data that a base station or the terminal desires to transmit may be managed in units of a transport block (TB) or a medium access control (MAC) protocol data unit (PDU) by each HARQ process, where in DL the TB or MAC PDU may include a downlink shared channel (DL-SCH) and/or a MAC control element (CE) and in UL the TB or MAC PDU may include an uplink shared channel (UL-SCH), a MAC CE, and/or physical layer control information (UCI), the data channel may include a DL data channel, PDSCH, PUSCH, and a PSSCH) discloses a single dedicated hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) process number across resource elements for N consecutive slots of the resource allocation (Moon et al., [0090] instances constituting repetitive transmission of the data channel may correspond to the same HARQ process and may include coded data for the same TB(s), where repetitive transmission of a data channel may mean repetitive transmission for the same HARQ process and the same TB(s)). Thus, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention to combine a single dedicated hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) process number across resource elements for N consecutive slots of the resource allocation as taught by Moon et al. with the system of Shi et al. in order to perform repetitive transmission in a plurality of slots (Moon et al., [0091]). Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shi et al. - Moon et al., as applied to claim8 above and further in view of Zhang et al. (US 20180249370 A1). Regarding claim 10, Shi et al. – Moon et al. do not expressly disclose, for ultra-reliable low latency communications (URLLC) traffic, the number of symbols L is scaled by the scaling factor and the starting symbol S0 is not scaled by the scaling factor. Zhang et al., for example from an analogous field of endeavor (Zhang et al., [0012] transport block size (TBS) tables in one set can be a scaled version of those in another set, where TBS tables can be generated according to URLLC design principle, such as finer granularity refinement and lower minimum TBSs in relation to [0032] a network node will generate and/or select TBS/MCS mapping tables for different traffics in a table selection unit, and will inform table selections and/or a scaling factor to the UE via a transceiver during a radio bearer establishment procedure of the UE) discloses for ultra-reliable low latency communications (URLLC) traffic, the number of symbols L is scaled by the scaling factor (Zhang et al., [0041] the TBS of one set is scaled from the TBS of another set with a unified scaling factor or several different scaling factors so that the TBS of one set has a smaller TBS range than the other) and the starting symbol S0 is not scaled by the scaling factor (Zhang et al., [0041] the scaling factor(s) may be selected according to TBS index ITBS and/or total number of allocated PRBs NPRB or the scaling factor(s) may be selected according to frequency domain spreading factor). Thus, it would have been obvious matter of design choice to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention to combine for ultra-reliable low latency communications (URLLC) traffic, the number of symbols L is scaled by the scaling factor and the starting symbol S0 is not scaled by the scaling factor as taught by Zhang et al. with the combined system of Shi et al. - Moon et al. in order to generate tables according to URLLC design principle (Zhang et al., [0042]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Gha et al. (US 20230120684 A1) is cited to show a terminal that receives configuration information from a base station, where the configuration information may include parameter candidate values for scaling of a TBS and control information from a DCI, where the control information may indicate at least one value among parameters for scaling, and the terminal identifies a TBS scaling parameter from the received control information, identifies resource allocation information and pieces of information required for data decoding, including an MCS, an RV, and an NDI, which is similar to aspects of the claimed invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LIONEL PREVAL whose telephone number is (571)270-5673. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10 AM - 4 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NOEL BEHARRY can be reached at 571-270-5630. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /L.P./Examiner, Art Unit 2416 /NOEL R BEHARRY/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2416
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Dec 07, 2023
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 06, 2024
Response Filed
Jun 25, 2024
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 21, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 27, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 05, 2025
Response Filed
May 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683832
MOBILE TERMINAL AND BASE STATION INVOLVED IN DOWNLINK CHANNEL OPERATIONS INCLUDING RADIO CHANNEL ESTIMATION BASED ON DEMODULATION REFERENCE SIGNAL
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684378
LOCAL 5G MONITORING SYSTEM USING WIRELESS TERMINAL
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12652247
SELECTIVE FORWARDING, PRIORITIZATION, AND QUEUEING BY EDGE DEVICES
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12640891
CHANNEL FILTERING IN A USER EQUIPMENT
3y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12621231
PROVIDING CONFIDENCE THRESHOLDS IN AN ANALYTICS REQUEST OR SUBSCRIPTION
2y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+43.7%)
4y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 302 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month