Office Action Predictor
Application No. 17/594,274

HYBRID CORD AND TYRE WITH SUCH CORD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 08, 2021
Examiner
FISCHER, JUSTIN R
Art Unit
1749
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Pirelli Tyre S.P.A.
OA Round
7 (Non-Final)
44%
Grant Probability
Moderate
7-8
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
46%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

44%
Career Allow Rate
722 granted / 1622 resolved
Without
With
+1.1%
Interview Lift
avg trend
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
109 pending
1731
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
69.7%
+29.7% vs TC avg
§102
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 27, 40, 42, and 46 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 27 recites the limitation "the hybrid reinforcing cord" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 40 recites the limitation "the hybrid reinforcing cord" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 42 recites the limitation "the hybrid reinforcing cord" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 46 recites the limitation "the hybrid reinforcing cord" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 18, 20, 22, 28-30, 34-39, 41, 43-45, and 47 are allowed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN R FISCHER whose telephone number is (571)272-1215. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 5:30-2:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Katelyn Smith can be reached at 571-270-5545. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Justin Fischer /JUSTIN R FISCHER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1749 December 30, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 08, 2021
Application Filed
Apr 19, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Sep 19, 2023
Response Filed
Sep 22, 2023
Final Rejection — §112
Feb 15, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 17, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 21, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
May 31, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
May 31, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 15, 2024
Response Filed
Sep 25, 2024
Final Rejection — §112
Dec 20, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 23, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jun 10, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 16, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Dec 16, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 18, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Mar 18, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12594792
Tire With Pressure Zero Sidewall Hoop Rings and Method of Manufacture
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583259
PNEUMATIC TIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576675
TIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570106
ASSEMBLY FOR A TIRE, TIRE AND ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURING METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565063
TIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
44%
Grant Probability
46%
With Interview (+1.1%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1622 resolved cases by this examiner