Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 17/595,107

RECYCLABLE MOLDED ARTICLES FROM BLENDS OF COPOLYESTERS AND RECYCLED PET

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Nov 09, 2021
Priority
May 10, 2019 — provisional 62/846,194 +1 more
Examiner
LISTVOYB, GREGORY
Art Unit
1765
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Eastman Chemical Company
OA Round
6 (Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
813 granted / 1214 resolved
+2.0% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+29.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1240
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
58.5%
+18.5% vs TC avg
§102
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
§112
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1214 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The previous prior art rejection under Treece et al (US 20130029068 in view of Garriga et al (US 20180194117) and Treece in view of Garriga and further in view of Shell Tung et al (US 6025405), maintained. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 5, 7, 14 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Treece et al (US 20130029068), cited in IDS and previous Office Action in view of Garriga et al (US 20180194117), cited in previous Office Action. Claims 8-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Treece in view of Garriga as applied to claims 5, 7, 14 and 18 above, and further in view of Shell Tung et al (US 6025405) cited in previous Office Action. Amendment to claims 5 and 7-9 are noted. The rejection can be found in the FINAL office action mailed 7/28/2025 and is herein incorporated by reference Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 6/18/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant states that Treece's EG range falls entirely within Garriga's disclosed range, where is no motivation to modify the reference in order to achieve bending or 9-kinking resistance. Examiner disagrees. Garriga discloses that 2, 2, 4, 4 – tetramethyl 1,3 -cyclobutanediol - modified polyesters is resistant against bending and kinking under mechanical load (see 0007). Thus, addition of such component increases bending or 9-kinking resistance. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGORY LISTVOYB whose telephone number is (571)272-6105. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5pm EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Heidi Riviere Kelley can be reached at (571) 270-1831. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. GL /GREGORY LISTVOYB/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1765
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 6 earlier events
Apr 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 11, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 28, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 26, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 29, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 18, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12692347
METHOD FOR THE CONTINUOUS PREPARATION OF FORMULATED POLYAMIDE PREPOLYMERS
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686768
POLYBUTYLENE TEREPHTHALATE COMPOSITION AND RADAR DEVICE COMPONENT THEREOF
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12679929
POLYESTER RESIN
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674022
METHOD FOR PRODUCING ALIPHATIC POLYESTER, ALIPHATIC POLYESTER RESIN, AND ALIPHATIC POLYESTER RESIN COMPOSITION
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662569
PROCESS FOR THE FREE RADICAL POLYMERIZATION OF THIONOLACTONES OR THIONOCARBONATES
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+29.5%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1214 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month