Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 17/597,942

DISPLAY PANEL, DISPLAY DEVICE, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF DISPLAY PANEL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 06, 2023
Priority
Dec 28, 2021 — CN 202111629034.3 +1 more
Examiner
NADAV, ORI
Art Unit
2811
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
TCL Technology Group Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
427 granted / 712 resolved
-8.0% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
787
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
55.1%
+15.1% vs TC avg
§102
9.9%
-30.1% vs TC avg
§112
31.2%
-8.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 712 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gong et al. (12,453,223) in view of Smith (4,859,806).Regarding claim 1, Gong et al. teach in figure 2 and related text a display panel, comprising: a substrate 1 comprising a first surface, a second surface, and a side surface, wherein the first surface and the second surface are disposed opposite to each other, and the side surface is disposed between the first surface and the second surface; wherein the substrate 1 comprises a driving circuit layer 20, a base substrate 1, and a pixel layer 2 that are arranged from the second surface toward the first surface; a plurality of first terminals 5 disposed on the first surface of the substrate, wherein the first terminals are electrically connected to the pixel layer; a plurality of conductive lines 42, wherein each conductive line is at least partially disposed on the side surface of the substrate, and the conductive lines 42 are spaced apart from the first terminals 3; and a plurality of first connecting members 41 disposed on the substrate, wherein the first connecting members 41 are connected between the conductive lines 42 and the first terminals 5, so that the conductive lines are electrically connected to the first terminals. Gong et al. do not teach that a material of the first terminal is different from a material of the first connecting member, and the material of the first connecting member is different from a material of the conductive line, and wherein the material of the first connecting member comprises solder paste, and wherein each first connecting member comprising the solder paste bridges a gap between a corresponding one of the first terminals and a corresponding one of the conductive lines. Smith teaches in figure 11 and related text that a material of the first terminal 64 is different from a material of the first connecting member 74, and the material of the first connecting member 74 is different from a material of the conductive line 56, and wherein the material of the first connecting member 74 comprises solder paste, and wherein each first connecting member 74 comprising the solder paste bridges a gap between a corresponding one of the first terminals 64 and a corresponding one of the conductive lines 56. Gong et al. and Smith are analogous art because they are directed to semiconductor devices having metal layers and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify Gong et al. because they are from the same field of endeavor. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filling date of the claimed invention, to form a material of the first terminal is different from a material of the first connecting member, and the material of the first connecting member is different from a material of the conductive line, and wherein the material of the first connecting member comprises solder paste, and wherein each first connecting member comprising the solder paste bridges a gap between a corresponding one of the first terminals and a corresponding one of the conductive lines, as taught by Smith, in the device of Gong et al., in order to improve the structural integrity of the device by using solder to connect two metal layers. Regarding claim 2, Gong et al. teach in figure 2 and related text that each first connecting member is at least partially disposed on the first surface, and/or each first connecting member is at least partially disposed on the side surface. Regarding claim 3, Gong et al. teach in figure 1 and related text plurality of pixels. Therefore, Gong et al. teach a plurality of second terminals and a plurality of second connecting members, wherein the second terminals are disposed on the second surface of the substrate, the second terminals are spaced apart from the conductive lines, the second connecting members are disposed on the substrate, and the second connecting members are connected between the conductive lines and the second terminals, so that the conductive lines are electrically connected to the second terminals. Regarding claim 4, Gong et al. teach in figure 2 and related text that each second connecting member is at least partially disposed on the second surface, and/or each second connecting member is at least partially disposed on the side surface. Regarding claim 5, Gong et al. teach in figure 2 and related text that an orthographic projection of each first terminal projected on the substrate at least partially overlaps an orthographic projection of a corresponding one of the second terminals (another 120 in adjacent pixel) projected on the substrate. Regarding claim 6, Gong et al. teach in figure 2 and related text that the first terminals 120 are disposed on the first surface and close to the side surface, and/or the second terminals are disposed on the second surface and close to the side surface. Regarding claim 7, Gong et al. teach in figures 1-2 and related text that the display panel comprises multiple first terminals and multiple conductive lines 122, the first terminals are disposed in a one-to-one correspondence with the conductive lines, the display panel comprises multiple first connecting members, and each first connecting member is connected between the corresponding first terminal and the corresponding conductive line. Regarding claim 8, Gong et al. teach in figures 1-2 and related text that the display panel comprises multiple second terminals and multiple second connecting members, the second terminals are disposed in a one-to-one correspondence with the conductive lines, and each second connecting member is connected between the corresponding second terminal and the corresponding conductive line. Regarding claim 9, Gong et al. teach in figures 1-2 and related text that the first terminals are arranged side by side on the first surface and close to the side surface; and the second terminals (another one in adjacent pixel) are arranged side by side on the second surface and close to the side surface. Regarding claim 10, Gong et al. teach in figure 2 and related text that the display panel further comprises a protective layer 6 covering the first terminals, the second terminals, the conductive lines, the first connecting members, and the second connecting members. Regarding claim 11, Gong et al. teach in figure 2 and related text that the driving circuit layer 20 is electrically connected to the second terminals. Regarding claim 12, Gong et al. teach in figure 2 and related text that a material of the first terminals, the second terminals, and the conductive lines comprises one or more of copper, aluminum, molybdenum, or titanium; and a material of the first connecting members and the second connecting members comprises solder paste. Regarding claim 13, Gong et al. teach in figure 2 and related text a display device, comprising the display panel of claim 1. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-13 have been considered but are moot because of the new ground of rejection. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ORI NADAV whose telephone number is 571-272-1660. The examiner can normally be reached between the hours of 7 AM to 4 PM (Eastern Standard Time) Monday through Friday. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lynne Gurley can be reached on 571-272-1670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). O.N. /ORI NADAV/ 8/1/2026 PRIMARY EXAMINER TECHNOLOGY CENTER 2800
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 06, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §103
Jan 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 30, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 09, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12764927
STORAGE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR FORMING STORAGE DEVICE
4y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12733260
DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726559
DISPLAY DEVICE
4y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12727316
Light-Emitting Device, Light-Emitting Apparatus, Light-Emitting Module, Electronic Device, and Lighting Device
4y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12727154
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+21.2%)
3y 9m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 712 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month