Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/612,606

METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 19, 2021
Examiner
PRIEST, AARON A
Art Unit
1681
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allow Rate
486 granted / 794 resolved
+1.2% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
824
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
§103
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
§102
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
§112
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 794 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Status of the Claims Claims 1-4, 10-15, 18, 20-22, 24-27, 30-31 and 33-35 are pending. Claims 1-4, 11, 15, 20-22, 24-26 and 34 are the subject of this NON-FINAL Office Action. Claims 10, 12-14, 18, 27, 30-31 and 35 are withdrawn. This is the first action on the merits. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group 1 and the species of (1) nanopore sequencing (2) helicase motor protein, (3) single-stranded polynucleotide blocker, (4) loading site for blocking and (5) claim 11 in the reply filed on 08/22/2025 is acknowledged. The elections read on claims 1-4, 11, 15, 20-22, 24-26 and 34. Claims 10, 12-14, 18, 27, 30-31 and 35 are withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112- Indefiniteness The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (B) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-4, 11, 15, 20-22, 24-26 and 34 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. As to claims 1-4, they are utterly confusing in light of claim 11, which reflects the election of species. Specifically, the following two statements are mutually exclusive: “wherein the blocking moiety prevents the motor protein from moving off the spacer” (claims 1-4); versus “wherein binding the blocking moiety to the polynucleotide adapter forces the motor protein onto the spacer.” In other words, claims 1-4 require a step of “positioning the motor protein on the spacer” before binding the blocking moiety so that the blocking moiety cannot force the motor protein onto the spacer. Applicants must amend the claims to remove this confusing conflict. Claim 4 is confusing because it recites “a motor protein,” but claim 3 already recites “a motor protein.” Is this a different motor protein? Claims 20-21 confusingly include a “non-hybridised polynucleotide” that binds to the loading site. How can a non-hybridized polynucleotide be hybridized? In addition, if this is a blocking moiety, how does it block the motor protein if it is not hybridized to the adaptor? In fact, claims 1 and 3 require the blocking moiety is bound to the adaptor. This is mutually exclusive of non-hybridized. Claim 22 is an utterly improper Markush Grouping as is evident on its face. See MPEP §§ 2117 & 2173.05(h). Claim 24 recites “preferably,” which is confusing. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claim 25 is an improper Markush group missing the proper transitional phrasing. See MPEP §§ 2117 & 2173.05(h). Claim 25 is also confusing because its states “wherein the spacer comprises [various versions of -S-N-] wherein each S is a spacer unit and each N is a nucleotide.” It is unclear how a spacer comprises itself. In claim 26, it is not clear what Applicants mean by “independently selected.” For example, independent of what? Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. § 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, 11, 15, 20-22, 24-26 and 34 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by RAND (US 20180030525). As to claims 1-3 and 26, RAND teaches providing adaptor 304-306 with spacer 306 (Fig. 3); contacting adaptor 304-306 with helicase 308 (Fig. 3); the helicase 308 positioned on the spacer 306 (Fig. 3); and blocking moiety 304 bound to adaptor (Fig. 3; para. 0062). As to claims 4 and 11, the blocking moiety 304 is bound to a loading site and prevents helicase from proceeding to loading site (Fig. 3; paras. 0059 & 0061-62). As to claims 15, 20-21, the loading moiety includes single strand as does blocking moiety (id.) As to claims 22 and 24-25, the spacer 306 includes nucleotides (para. 0015). As to claim 34, taking one or more measurements as the target polynucleotide moves with respect to the nanopore, wherein the one or more measurements are indicative of one or more characteristics of the target polynucleotide, and thereby characterising the target polynucleotide as it moves with respect to the nanopore (e.g. Abstract and Figs. 1 & 4). Prior Art The following prior art also teaches nanopore systems with blocking moiety on adaptor for helicase-based movement: US 20130327644 (Fig. 4); US20160010147; US 20170306398; US 20170240955; US 20170253910; US 20170253923; US 20190071721; US 20190194722; US 20200024654; US 20190004029; US11560589; US 10059988; US 20100035260; US 20150152495; US20220042967. Conclusion No claims are allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Aaron Priest whose telephone number is (571)270-1095. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gary Benzion can be reached at (571) 272-0782. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AARON A PRIEST/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1681
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 19, 2021
Application Filed
Nov 23, 2021
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 15, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601008
Using Hairpin Formation To Identify DNA and RNA Sequences Having A Target Nucleic Acid Sequence
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595509
SYNTHETIC NUCLEIC ACID SPIKE-INS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590328
TARGETED DEPLETION OF NON-TARGET LIBRARY MOLECULES USING POISON PRIMERS DURING TARGET CAPTURE OF NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING LIBRARIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589396
DIGITAL TO BIOLOGICAL CONVERTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590341
BRASSICA GAT EVENT AND COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION AND/OR DETECTION THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+26.0%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 794 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month