Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/614,726

Method for Preparing a Coated Particulate Waste Material and a Coated Waste Particle

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Nov 29, 2021
Priority
Jun 03, 2019 — NL 2023250 +1 more
Examiner
LE, HOA T
Art Unit
1788
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Delta R&D B V
OA Round
4 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
790 granted / 1087 resolved
+7.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1138
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
68.1%
+28.1% vs TC avg
§102
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
§112
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1087 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 27 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 27 is indefinite in view of the terms “rapid” (in “rapid hardening cement”) and “high” (in “high alumina cement”) which are relative terms. The terms “rapid” and “high” are not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-6 and 11-13 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art references, Chuang and Yang, in combination teach a coating material comprising two components, which are silane coupling agent and urethane or polyurethane, as required in the claims; and Yang does teach the silane coupling agent being 1 wt to 2 wt% of the particulate and the polyurethane being 10-30 wt% of the particulate, and thus the proportion of silane coupling agent in the coating material would overlap the claimed range of 1 to 10 wt% of silane coupling agent in the coating material. However, the silane coupling agent is applied separately from the urethane/polyurethane instead of forming a coating material comprising both components prior to the coating process. In addition, Chuang teaches coating individual particulate waste material having an average particle size of less than 10 mm while the claimed method requires a particulate waste fraction having an average particle size of at least 100 mm. Election/Restrictions Claims 15, 17-19, 21, 23 and 24 are directed to an invention non-elected without traverse. Accordingly, claims 15, 17-19, 21, 23 and 24 should have been cancelled. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOA (Holly) LE whose telephone number is (571)272-1511. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday, 10:00 am to 7:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alicia Chevalier can be reached at 571-272-1490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. HOA (Holly) LE Primary Examiner Art Unit 1788 /HOA (Holly) LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1788
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Nov 21, 2024
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 24, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 03, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Nov 03, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 04, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 11, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679776
HIGH TEMPERATURE BRAZING OF METALS AND CERAMICS TO CARBON SUBSTRATES
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12661869
ELECTRICAL STEEL SHEET LAMINATE HAVING HIGH STACKING FACTOR AND COMPRISING A POLYMERIC ADHESIVE LAYER COMPRISING NANOPARTICLES OF SiO2, TiO2 AND/OR ZnO
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12644885
FLUORESCENT MICROSPHERES EVENLY COATED WITH MAGNETIC PARTICLES AND METHODS OF USE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12637601
ABRASIVE ARTICLE INCLUDING SHAPED ABRASIVE PARTICLES
2y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630695
RESIN COMPOSITION, ACOUSTIC MEMBER, ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER, ULTRASOUND PROBE, AND ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS
3y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+12.6%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1087 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month