Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 17/625,557

DISPERSIONS

Non-Final OA §103§DP
Filed
Jan 07, 2022
Examiner
MILLER, DANIEL H
Art Unit
1783
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Applied Graphene Materials Uk Limited
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 1m
To Grant
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allow Rate
367 granted / 687 resolved
-11.6% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 1m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
717
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
66.1%
+26.1% vs TC avg
§102
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 687 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 7/11/2025 has been entered. Double Patenting Claims 1, 4, 7-8, 11-13 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1, 3, 5, 8-12, 14, 16-18 of copending Application No. 17/625,462 (reference application). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because they claim substantially overlapping subject matter just using different wording or slightly different scopes. This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection because the patentably indistinct claims have not in fact been patented. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 4, 7-8, 11-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN 105209385 (2015) in view of Chen (CN 105819438) (2018). CN 105209385 (2015) teaches a graphene boron carbide or nitride coating or paint (see abstract; considered a coating solution as claimed) composite formed from a solvent, 2-300 layers of graphene (average thickness under 100nm), boron carbide or nitride (see translation). The particles of graphene and boron are dispersed in the solvent/solution. Providing a mixing, milling or crushing step in a solvent. The solvent can include glycol ethers, butanol, ketone compound, or acetates as claimed (see translation) The resin can be an aldehyde compound as claimed. Regarding claim 7, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to provide the claimed milling given the teaching of milling in the reference one of ordinary skill would understand that various laboratory milling processes employed the art could be varied in substitution for the same purpose. Regarding claims, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to provide the claimed number of layers of graphene layers within the claimed numbers dependent upon desired final properties. If applicant claims a trade name Laropal A81. The Examiner notes the Trade names can be changed and or the chemical formula or additives can be modified. Therefore, it is not clear what is being claimed in the instant invention. Given the teaching of an aldehyde resin “Laropal A81” would be considered obvious to provide. Chen (CN 105819438) (2018) teaches forming a graphene in solution by using solvents including aldehydes and grinding to form graphene from larger graphite particles. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to provide an aldehyde solvent for grind applications for graphene including the claimed aldehyde. Applicant newly claims “wherein the at least one grinding media is to improve dispersion of the 2D materia/graphitic nanoplatelet particles in the liquid dispersion.” The art teaches the same aldehyde composition and thus provides the same grinding medium and would necessarily function as claimed to greater disperse the same materials. Rejection maintained. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 7/11/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The 112 rejection has been withdrawn due to amendment. Applicant newly claims “wherein the at least one grinding media is to improve dispersion of the 2D materia/graphitic nanoplatelet particles in the liquid dispersion.” The art teaches the same aldehyde composition and thus provides the same grinding medium and would necessarily function as claimed to greater disperse the same materials. Rejection maintained. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL H MILLER whose telephone number is (571)272-1534. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 9-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Veronica Ewald can be reached at 571-272-8519. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL H MILLER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 07, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 21, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §DP
Dec 23, 2024
Response Filed
Apr 05, 2025
Final Rejection — §103, §DP
Jun 09, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 11, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 13, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594579
ENVIRONMENTAL BARRIER COATING AND METHOD OF REPAIRING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12577023
Recyclable paper packaging with high barrier to water vapor and oxygen
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571129
TWO-DIMENSIONAL VERTICAL COMPOSITE LAMINATE INCLUDING GRAPHENE AND HEXAGONAL BORON NITRIDE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12540105
HIGH TEMPERATURE COATINGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12534639
MICHAEL ADDITION CURABLE COMPOSITION, COATING COMPOSITION CONTAINING THE SAME, AND COATED ARTICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+21.1%)
4y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 687 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month