Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 17/630,097

USER EQUIPMENT AND SCHEDULING NODE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jan 25, 2022
Priority
Aug 02, 2019 — EU 19189894.9 +1 more
Examiner
PASIA, REDENTOR M
Art Unit
2413
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
6 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
538 granted / 678 resolved
+21.4% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
719
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§103
56.7%
+16.7% vs TC avg
§102
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
§112
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 678 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Applicant's amendment filed on 04/10/2026 has been entered. Claims 1, 4-5, 7, 12 and 14-15 have been amended. Claims 18-19 have been added. No claims have been cancelled. Claims 1, 4-5, 7, 10, 12, 14-15 and 17-19 are still pending in this application, with claims 1, 12, 14 and 15, being independent. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 4-5, 7, 10, 12, 14-15 and 17-19 have been considered but are moot based on new grounds of rejections. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1, 4-5, 7, 12, 14-15, 17 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Maleki et al. (US 2022/0174603; hereinafter Maleki) in view of Nader et al. (US 2022/0279479; hereinafter Nader). Note: Subject matter relied upon in the rejection is supported in provisional applications 62/827,761 of Maleki and 62/881,680 of Nader. Regarding claim 1, Maleki shows a communication apparatus (Figures 8-9 shows a UE performing the disclosed method of Figure 6.), comprising: a transceiver (Figures 8-9; RF transceiver.) which, in operation, receives at least one physical downlink control channel (PDCCH), which includes a paging indication (Figure 6; Par. 0106; UE receives a paging indication on the PDCCH.); and circuitry (Figure 8; noted various circuitry of UE.) which, in operation, determines an allocation of a paging occasion based on the paging indication (Figure 6; Par. 0106; determines, while in the sleep mode, whether the wireless device is to receive a paging message corresponding to the paging indication.) wherein: the paging indication indicates either a first value or a second value different from the first value for each UE group of a plurality of UE groups for the communication apparatus (Figure 6; Par. 0080, 0106; the wireless device determines, while in the sleep mode, whether the wireless device is to receive a paging message corresponding to the paging indication. This determination is based on whether the UE's P-RNTI or GP-RNTI matches that of the paging indication. Group P-RNTI (GP-RNTI) approach involves configuring different sets of one or more UEs with different GP-RNTIs, and the network includes in the paging indications on PDCCH the appropriate one of the GP-RNTIs for the set of UEs that it is paging.), when the paging indication indicates the first value, the paging occasion is to occur and is not monitored (Figure 6; Par. 0106; if the wireless device determines that is it is not to receive the paging message corresponding to the paging indication (e.g., because there is no P-RNTI or GP-RNTI match), in step 640, the wireless device stays in the sleep mode or transitions to a deeper sleep mode (e.g., until the next paging occasion).), and when the paging indication indicates the second value, the paging occasion is to occur and is monitored (Figure 6; Par. 0106; if the wireless device determines that it is to receive the paging message corresponding to the paging indication (e.g., because there is a P-RNTI or GP-RNTI match), in step 650, the wireless device transitions to an awake mode before the paging message corresponding to the paging indication is to be transmitted by the base station to receive the paging message.). Maleki shows all of the elements except a paging occasion monitored for paging downlink control information (DCI) based on the paging occasion and the paging indication indicates a bitmap, a first bit of the bitmap corresponds to a first UE group of the plurality of UE groups for the paging occasion, and a second bit of the bitmap corresponds to a second UE group of the plurality of UE groups for the paging occasion. However, the above-mentioned claim limitations are well-established in the art as evidenced by Chen. Specifically, Chen shows a paging occasion monitored for paging downlink control information (DCI) based on the paging occasion (Par. 0005; The UE in RRC_IDLE state monitors physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) during a paging occasion (PO) within a paging frame (PF). If the UE detects downlink control information (DCI) scrambled by the paging-radio network temporary identity (P-RNTI) which is transmitted on the PDCCH during the PO, the UE reads a paging record transmitted on physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) which is indicated by the DCI so as to check whether its own (the UE's) UE identity (ID) is included in the paging record.); and the paging indication indicates a bitmap, a first bit of the bitmap corresponds to a first UE group of the plurality of UE groups for the paging occasion, and a second bit of the bitmap corresponds to a second UE group of the plurality of UE groups for the paging occasion (Par. 0111; The paging indication may be a hash applied to an identifier of a paged UE, a truncation of the identifier of the paged UE, an identifier or a bitmap of a paging group where the paged UE locates. The bitmap is a binary number, and each bit of the bitmap corresponds to a paging group. The value of each bit of the bitmap indicates whether the corresponding paging group includes the paged UE.). In view of the above, having the system of Maleki, then given the well-established teaching of Chen, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Maleki as taught by Chen, in order to provide motivation for reducing the number of the downlink beams for transmitting the paging message (Par. 0011 of Chen). Regarding claim 4, modified Maleki shows wherein the paging occasion is configured via Radio Resource Control (RRC) signaling (Maleki: Par. 0090-0091; paging message configured via RRC signaling.), and the at least one PDCCH indicates enabling or disabling the paging occasion (Maleki: Figure 6; Par. 0106; If the wireless device determines that is it is not to receive the paging message corresponding to the paging indication (e.g., because there is no P-RNTI or GP-RNTI match), in step 640, the wireless device stays in the sleep mode or transitions to a deeper sleep mode (e.g., until the next paging occasion). However, if the wireless device determines that it is to receive the paging message corresponding to the paging indication (e.g., because there is a P-RNTI or GP-RNTI match), in step 650, the wireless device transitions to an awake mode before the paging message corresponding to the paging indication is to be transmitted by the base station to receive the paging message.). Regarding claim 5, modified Maleki shows wherein the circuitry, in operation, determines that the paging DCI is allocated to the paging occasion unless the at least one PDCCH indicates that allocation of the paging DCI to the paging occasion is disabled (Maleki: Figure 6; Par. 0106; If the wireless device determines that is it is not to receive the paging message corresponding to the paging indication (e.g., because there is no P-RNTI or GP-RNTI match), in step 640, the wireless device stays in the sleep mode or transitions to a deeper sleep mode (e.g., until the next paging occasion).). Regarding claim 7, modified Maleki shows wherein the circuitry, in operation, determines that the paging DCI is allocated to the paging occasion if the at least one PDCCH indicates that allocation of the paging DCI to the paging occasion is enabled (Maleki: Figure 6; Par. 0106; if the wireless device determines that it is to receive the paging message corresponding to the paging indication (e.g., because there is a P-RNTI or GP-RNTI match), in step 650, the wireless device transitions to an awake mode before the paging message corresponding to the paging indication is to be transmitted by the base station to receive the paging message.). Regarding claim 12, Maleki shows a scheduling node (Figure 8 shows a network node/base station performing in part the disclosed method of Figure 7.), comprising: circuitry (Figure 8; noted various circuitry of the base station.) which, in operation, performs allocation of a paging occasion be monitored by a communication apparatus, and generates at least one physical downlink control channel (PDCCH), which includes a paging indication (Figure 7; Par. 0106-0107; the base station generates and transmits a paging indication on the PDCCH to a set of wireless devices.); and a transceiver (Figure 8; RF transceiver.) which, in operation, transmits the at least one PDCCH (Figure 7; Par. 0106-0107; the base station generates and transmits a paging indication on the PDCCH to a set of wireless devices.), wherein: the paging indication indicates either a first value or a second value different from the first value for each UE group of a plurality of UE groups for the communication apparatus (Figure 6; Par. 0080, 0106; the wireless device determines, while in the sleep mode, whether the wireless device is to receive a paging message corresponding to the paging indication. This determination is based on whether the UE's P-RNTI or GP-RNTI matches that of the paging indication. Group P-RNTI (GP-RNTI) approach involves configuring different sets of one or more UEs with different GP-RNTIs, and the network includes in the paging indications on PDCCH the appropriate one of the GP-RNTIs for the set of UEs that it is paging.), when the paging indication indicates the first value, the paging occasion is to occur and is not monitored (Figure 6; Par. 0106; if the wireless device determines that is it is not to receive the paging message corresponding to the paging indication (e.g., because there is no P-RNTI or GP-RNTI match), in step 640, the wireless device stays in the sleep mode or transitions to a deeper sleep mode (e.g., until the next paging occasion).), and when the paging indication indicates the second value, the paging occasion is to occur and is monitored (Figure 6; Par. 0106; if the wireless device determines that it is to receive the paging message corresponding to the paging indication (e.g., because there is a P-RNTI or GP-RNTI match), in step 650, the wireless device transitions to an awake mode before the paging message corresponding to the paging indication is to be transmitted by the base station to receive the paging message.). Maleki shows all of the elements except performing transmission of the paging DCI in accordance with the allocation of the paging occasion and the paging indication indicates a bitmap, a first bit of the bitmap corresponds to a first UE group of the plurality of UE groups for the paging occasion, and a second bit of the bitmap corresponds to a second UE group of the plurality of UE groups for the paging occasion. However, the above-mentioned claim limitations are well-established in the art as evidenced by Chen. Specifically, Chen shows performing transmission of the paging DCI in accordance with the allocation of the paging occasion (Par. 0005; The UE in RRC_IDLE state monitors physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) during a paging occasion (PO) within a paging frame (PF). If the UE detects downlink control information (DCI) scrambled by the paging-radio network temporary identity (P-RNTI) which is transmitted on the PDCCH during the PO, the UE reads a paging record transmitted on physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) which is indicated by the DCI so as to check whether its own (the UE's) UE identity (ID) is included in the paging record.); and the paging indication indicates a bitmap, a first bit of the bitmap corresponds to a first UE group of the plurality of UE groups for the paging occasion, and a second bit of the bitmap corresponds to a second UE group of the plurality of UE groups for the paging occasion (Par. 0111; The paging indication may be a hash applied to an identifier of a paged UE, a truncation of the identifier of the paged UE, an identifier or a bitmap of a paging group where the paged UE locates. The bitmap is a binary number, and each bit of the bitmap corresponds to a paging group. The value of each bit of the bitmap indicates whether the corresponding paging group includes the paged UE.). In view of the above, having the system of Maleki, then given the well-established teaching of Chen, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Maleki as taught by Chen, in order to provide motivation for reducing the number of the downlink beams for transmitting the paging message (Par. 0011 of Chen). Regarding claim 14, Maleki shows a paging method (Figure 6 shows a method performed by a UE.) to be performed by a communication apparatus, comprising: receiving at least one physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) which includes a paging indication (Figure 6; Par. 0106; UE receives a paging indication on the PDCCH.); and determining an allocation of a paging occasion based on the paging indication (Figure 6; Par. 0106; determines, while in the sleep mode, whether the wireless device is to receive a paging message corresponding to the paging indication.), wherein: the paging indication indicates either a first value or a second value different from the first value for each UE group of a plurality of UE groups for the communication apparatus (Figure 6; Par. 0080, 0106; the wireless device determines, while in the sleep mode, whether the wireless device is to receive a paging message corresponding to the paging indication. This determination is based on whether the UE's P-RNTI or GP-RNTI matches that of the paging indication. Group P-RNTI (GP-RNTI) approach involves configuring different sets of one or more UEs with different GP-RNTIs, and the network includes in the paging indications on PDCCH the appropriate one of the GP-RNTIs for the set of UEs that it is paging.), when the paging indication indicates the first value, the paging occasion is to occur and is not monitored (Figure 6; Par. 0106; if the wireless device determines that is it is not to receive the paging message corresponding to the paging indication (e.g., because there is no P-RNTI or GP-RNTI match), in step 640, the wireless device stays in the sleep mode or transitions to a deeper sleep mode (e.g., until the next paging occasion).), and when the paging indication indicates the second value, the paging occasion is to occur and is monitored (Figure 6; Par. 0106; if the wireless device determines that it is to receive the paging message corresponding to the paging indication (e.g., because there is a P-RNTI or GP-RNTI match), in step 650, the wireless device transitions to an awake mode before the paging message corresponding to the paging indication is to be transmitted by the base station to receive the paging message.). Maleki shows all of the elements except a paging occasion monitored for paging downlink control information (DCI) based on the paging occasion and the paging indication indicates a bitmap, a first bit of the bitmap corresponds to a first UE group of the plurality of UE groups for the paging occasion, and a second bit of the bitmap corresponds to a second UE group of the plurality of UE groups for the paging occasion. However, the above-mentioned claim limitations are well-established in the art as evidenced by Chen. Specifically, Chen shows a paging occasion monitored for paging downlink control information (DCI) based on the paging occasion (Par. 0005; The UE in RRC_IDLE state monitors physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) during a paging occasion (PO) within a paging frame (PF). If the UE detects downlink control information (DCI) scrambled by the paging-radio network temporary identity (P-RNTI) which is transmitted on the PDCCH during the PO, the UE reads a paging record transmitted on physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) which is indicated by the DCI so as to check whether its own (the UE's) UE identity (ID) is included in the paging record.); and the paging indication indicates a bitmap, a first bit of the bitmap corresponds to a first UE group of the plurality of UE groups for the paging occasion, and a second bit of the bitmap corresponds to a second UE group of the plurality of UE groups for the paging occasion (Par. 0111; The paging indication may be a hash applied to an identifier of a paged UE, a truncation of the identifier of the paged UE, an identifier or a bitmap of a paging group where the paged UE locates. The bitmap is a binary number, and each bit of the bitmap corresponds to a paging group. The value of each bit of the bitmap indicates whether the corresponding paging group includes the paged UE.). In view of the above, having the system of Maleki, then given the well-established teaching of Chen, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Maleki as taught by Chen, in order to provide motivation for reducing the number of the downlink beams for transmitting the paging message (Par. 0011 of Chen). Regarding claim 15, Maleki shows a paging method (Figure 7 shows a method performed by a base station.) to be performed by a scheduling node, comprising: performing allocation of a paging occasion monitored by a communication apparatus (Figure 7; Par. 0106-0107; the base station generates and transmits a paging indication on the PDCCH to a set of wireless devices.); generating at least one physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) which includes a paging indication (Figure 7; Par. 0106-0107; the base station generates and transmits a paging indication on the PDCCH to a set of wireless devices.); transmitting the at least one PDCCH (Figure 7; Par. 0106-0107; the base station generates and transmits a paging indication on the PDCCH to a set of wireless devices.); and performing transmission in accordance with the allocation of the paging occasion (Figure 7; Par. 0106-0107; the base station generates and transmits a paging indication on the PDCCH to a set of wireless devices.), wherein: the paging indication indicates either a first value or a second value different from the first value for each UE group of a plurality of UE groups for the communication apparatus (Figure 6; Par. 0080, 0106; the wireless device determines, while in the sleep mode, whether the wireless device is to receive a paging message corresponding to the paging indication. This determination is based on whether the UE's P-RNTI or GP-RNTI matches that of the paging indication. Group P-RNTI (GP-RNTI) approach involves configuring different sets of one or more UEs with different GP-RNTIs, and the network includes in the paging indications on PDCCH the appropriate one of the GP-RNTIs for the set of UEs that it is paging.), when the paging indication indicates the first value, the paging occasion is to occur and is not monitored (Figure 6; Par. 0106; if the wireless device determines that is it is not to receive the paging message corresponding to the paging indication (e.g., because there is no P-RNTI or GP-RNTI match), in step 640, the wireless device stays in the sleep mode or transitions to a deeper sleep mode (e.g., until the next paging occasion).), and when the paging indication indicates the second value, the paging occasion is to occur and is monitored (Figure 6; Par. 0106; if the wireless device determines that it is to receive the paging message corresponding to the paging indication (e.g., because there is a P-RNTI or GP-RNTI match), in step 650, the wireless device transitions to an awake mode before the paging message corresponding to the paging indication is to be transmitted by the base station to receive the paging message.). Maleki shows all of the elements except performing transmission of the paging DCI in accordance with the allocation of the paging occasion and the paging indication indicates a bitmap, a first bit of the bitmap corresponds to a first UE group of the plurality of UE groups for the paging occasion, and a second bit of the bitmap corresponds to a second UE group of the plurality of UE groups for the paging occasion. However, the above-mentioned claim limitations are well-established in the art as evidenced by Chen. Specifically, Chen shows performing transmission of the paging DCI in accordance with the allocation of the paging occasion (Par. 0005; The UE in RRC_IDLE state monitors physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) during a paging occasion (PO) within a paging frame (PF). If the UE detects downlink control information (DCI) scrambled by the paging-radio network temporary identity (P-RNTI) which is transmitted on the PDCCH during the PO, the UE reads a paging record transmitted on physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) which is indicated by the DCI so as to check whether its own (the UE's) UE identity (ID) is included in the paging record.); and the paging indication indicates a bitmap, a first bit of the bitmap corresponds to a first UE group of the plurality of UE groups for the paging occasion, and a second bit of the bitmap corresponds to a second UE group of the plurality of UE groups for the paging occasion (Par. 0111; The paging indication may be a hash applied to an identifier of a paged UE, a truncation of the identifier of the paged UE, an identifier or a bitmap of a paging group where the paged UE locates. The bitmap is a binary number, and each bit of the bitmap corresponds to a paging group. The value of each bit of the bitmap indicates whether the corresponding paging group includes the paged UE.). In view of the above, having the system of Maleki, then given the well-established teaching of Chen, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Maleki as taught by Chen, in order to provide motivation for reducing the number of the downlink beams for transmitting the paging message (Par. 0011 of Chen). Regarding claim 17, modified Maleki shows wherein the paging occasion corresponds to the UE groups for the communication apparatus associated with an identifier of the communication apparatus (Maleki: Figure 6; Par. 0080, 0106; the wireless device determines, while in the sleep mode, whether the wireless device is to receive a paging message corresponding to the paging indication. This determination is based on whether the UE's P-RNTI or GP-RNTI matches that of the paging indication. Group P-RNTI (GP-RNTI) approach involves configuring different sets of one or more UEs with different GP-RNTIs, and the network includes in the paging indications on PDCCH the appropriate one of the GP-RNTIs for the set of UEs that it is paging.), and the at least one PDCCH indicates whether or not the UE groups for the communication apparatus are enabled (Maleki: Figure 6; Par. 0106; if the wireless device determines that it is to receive the paging message corresponding to the paging indication (e.g., because there is a P-RNTI or GP-RNTI match), in step 650, the wireless device transitions to an awake mode before the paging message corresponding to the paging indication is to be transmitted by the base station to receive the paging message.). Regarding claim 19, modified Maleki shows wherein a number of bits in the bitmap is associated with a number of UE groups and a number of paging occasions (Chen: Par. 0111; The paging indication may be a hash applied to an identifier of a paged UE, a truncation of the identifier of the paged UE, an identifier or a bitmap of a paging group where the paged UE locates. The bitmap is a binary number, and each bit of the bitmap corresponds to a paging group.). Claim(s) 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Maleki in view of Chen and Wigard et al. (US 2022/0225270; hereinafter Wigard). Note: Subject matter relied upon in the rejection is supported in provisional application 62/840,545 of Wigard. Regarding claim 10, modified Maleki shows all of the elements except wherein the at least one PDCCH is a beam-specific PDCCH transmitted on one beam out of a plurality of beams swept by the scheduling node, and the allocation of the at least one downlink symbol which the circuitry determines to be the paging time occasion to be monitored is beam-specific. However, the above-mentioned claim limitations are well-established in the art as evidenced by Wigard. Specifically, Wigard shows wherein the at least one PDCCH is a beam-specific PDCCH transmitted on one beam out of a plurality of beams swept by the scheduling node, and the allocation of the at least one downlink symbol which the circuitry determines to be the paging time occasion to be monitored is beam-specific (Figure 3; Par. 0035-0036, 0073-0075; the UE 10 is able to determine with calculations, such as beam order calculations, using information from a network node that its PO is during beam Bx4 of the PO 210 sequence as provided from the network node. Further, as shown in item 230 of FIG. 3 the calculations lead the UE 10 to listen to only beam Bx4 of PO 210 while remaining asleep at other times during the DRX cycle 205. Paging indication on the PDCCH is single fixed indicator such as with a hexadecimal value of (FFFE) that called the Paging RNTI (P-RNTI). Different groups of UEs monitor different sub frames for their paging messages. UEs in idle mode monitor the PDCCH channel using their P-RNTI to receive paging message from eNB. The UE needs to monitor the PDCCH only at certain UE specific paging occasion, i.e. only at specific subframe in specific radio frame. At other times the UE may go for sleep mode to save battery power.). In view of the above, having the system of Maleki, then given the well-established teaching of Wigard, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Maleki as taught by Wigard, in order to provide motivation to improve paging and discontinuous reception (DRX) to improve at least these operations associated with such New Radio network implementations (Par. 0015 of Wigard). Claim(s) 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Maleki in view of Chen and Murray et al. (US 2020/0404617 A1; hereinafter Murray). Regarding claim 18, modified Maleki shows all of the elements except wherein a third bit of the bitmap corresponds to the first UE group of the plurality of UE groups for an other paging occasion, and a fourth bit of the bitmap corresponds to the second UE group of the plurality of UE groups for the other paging occasion. However, the above-mentioned claim limitations are well-established in the art as evidenced by Murray. Specifically, Murray shows wherein a third bit of the bitmap corresponds to the first UE group of the plurality of UE groups for an other paging occasion, and a fourth bit of the bitmap corresponds to the second UE group of the plurality of UE groups for the other paging occasion (Figure 77B; Par. 0464-0469; A P-bit field of paging type indicator is configured for the P-bit bitmap. Each bit in the paging type indicator field configures the corresponding group of UEs in the bitmap. FIG. 77B shows an example where the paging type indicator bit ti configures the paging type for UEs corresponding to bi in the bitmap. The value of ti may be ignored if the corresponding bi=0. This solution allows each group of UEs to be configured with an independent type of paging.). In view of the above, having the system of Maleki, then given the well-established teaching of Murray, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Maleki as taught by Murray, in order to provide motivation to reduce false alerts and excessive signaling in the system (Par. 0012 of Murray). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20160057731 A1 - TECHNIQUES FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING PAGING MESSAGES OVER AN UNLICENSED RADIO FREQUENCY SPECTRUM BAND Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REDENTOR M PASIA whose telephone number is (571)272-9745. The examiner can normally be reached Mondays-Thursdays - 5am-245pm and Fridays 5am-330pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Un Cho can be reached at (571)272-7919. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /REDENTOR PASIA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2413
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 14 earlier events
Sep 05, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 08, 2025
Interview Requested
Nov 04, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 04, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 18, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 10, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12701075
PACKET SENDING METHOD, DEVICE, AND SYSTEM
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12689943
COMMUNICATION CONTROL SYSTEM, COMMUNICATION CONTROL METHOD AND PROGRAM
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12665701
INDICATION OF PUCCH REPETITIONS VIA DCI CRC SCRAMBLING FOR WIRELESS NETWORKS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12652718
REDCAP UE FALLBACK
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12648018
UPLINK POLLING FOR NEW RADIO OPERATION IN MM-WAVE FREQUENCY BANDS
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.0%)
3y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 678 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month