Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 27, 2026
Application No. 17/632,532

DEOXYCHOLIC ACID COMPOUNDS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND USES THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Jul 12, 2022
Priority
Aug 06, 2019 — CN 201910721398.0 +1 more
Examiner
MOORE, SUSANNA
Art Unit
1624
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Qiang Huang
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
849 granted / 1249 resolved
+8.0% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
69 currently pending
Career history
1317
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
§102
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
§112
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1249 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This is a Final Office Action. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group (I) in the reply filed on June 10, 2025 is acknowledged. Group (I), drawn to compounds of formula (I) compositions, embraced by claims 1-8 was elected by Applicant. The traversal is on the ground(s) that unity of invention is satisfied under PCT Rule 13.2 and MPEP § 806. This is not persuasive. As noted by Applicant, “[U]nity of invention exists if the claims are so linked as to form a single general inventive concept.” The single general inventive concept must define a contribution over the prior art, which is not present in the instant claims, see the art rejection below. This is all that is required to break unity of invention. Moreover, the search and/or examination burden only applies to 35 U.S.C. 121 applications. Applicant has not pointed to any errors in the Examiner’s analysis of the different inventions. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Applicant elected the following species: PNG media_image1.png 170 324 media_image1.png Greyscale . Only claims 1-7 read on the elected species. The elected species was searched and not found. Thus, the search was expanded. Claims 1-16 and 20-23 are pending and claims 1-16 and 23 are under examination. Claim 23 is a new claim. Claims 9-22 are withdrawn based on the lack of unity. Claim Objections Claim 4 is objected to because of the following informalities: the inorganic and organic cations should not be plural. Appropriate correction is required. The objection is withdrawn form claims 1 and 6 based on the amendments and maintained for claim 4. The objection to claim 4 for the term “and” is withdrawn based on the amendments. Claims 1, 3, 9 and 10 are objected to because of the following informalities: the terms, “substituted alkylene,” “substituted alkenylene,” “substituted alkynylene,” “substituted cycloalkylene,” “substituted arylene,” “substituted heteroarylene,” and “substituted heterocyclene,” “the alkenylene,” “the alkynylene,” “the cycloalkylene,” “the arylene,” “the heteroarylene,” and “the heterocyclene” are no longer found in claim 1. These terms should be removed from the claims, see page 3, lines 5-9; page 4, lines 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 16, page 10, lines 11-15; page 11, lines 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 16. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The rejection of claims 1-7 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for the phrase, “modified alkyl” is withdrawn based on the amendments. The rejection of claim 3 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for the broad recitation halogen is withdrawn based on the amendments. The rejection of claims 3 and 4 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite since all definitions are optional, is withdrawn based on the amendments. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (B) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 4 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. In claims 4 and 11, the phrase “sodium ions, potassium ions, magnesium ions, calcium ions, ammonium, tetramethylammonium, tetraethylammonium, tetrapropylammonium and tetrabutylammonium“ lacks antecedent basis. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The rejection of claims 1-7 under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Xiao et al. (ACS Med. Chem. Lett., 2017, 8, 1246−1251) in view of Pellicciari, R. (US 7138390) and Berge et al. (Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1977, 66(1), 1-19), is withdrawn based on the amendments. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SUSANNA MOORE whose telephone number is (571)272-9046. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 10:00 am to 7:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Murray can be reached on 571-272-9023. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SUSANNA MOORE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1624
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 12, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Jan 23, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Jun 29, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 24, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 25, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12686700
NEUROACTIVE STEROIDS SUBSTITUTED IN POSITION 10 WITH A CYCLIC GROUP FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF CNS DISORDERS
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12679851
METHYL-SUBSTITUTED BENZOBISOXAZOLE COMPOUND AND USE THEREOF
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673944
COMPOUNDS HAVING INHIBITORY ACTIVITY AGAINST GLUCOSYLCERAMIDE SYNTHASE OR PHARMACEUTICALLY ACCEPTABLE SALT THEREOF, PROCESSES FOR PREPARING THE SAME, AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING THE SAME
4y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673970
NEUROACTIVE STEROIDS AND THEIR METHODS OF USE
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667573
COMPOUNDS, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISEASE
4y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+31.6%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1249 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month