Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 17/634,412

COMPOSITIONS REMOVABLE BY THERMAL ACTIVATION, USES AND ASSEMBLIES COMPRISING SUCH COMPOSITIONS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Feb 10, 2022
Examiner
COONEY, JOHN M
Art Unit
1765
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Rescoll
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
651 granted / 1045 resolved
-2.7% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1081
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
43.2%
+3.2% vs TC avg
§102
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
§112
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1045 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/23/2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-7, 9-16, 21 and 23-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Applicants’ originally filed supporting disclosure, including the heating/drying conditions pointed to by applicants at page 8 lines 10-15, does not provide support for the now claimed solubility parameters set forth by the claims. This is a new matter rejection. Response to Arguments Rejections under 35USC102 and 35USC103 are withdrawn in light of applicants’ amendments to the claims. It is agreed that the polyamide materials of the cited prior art, particularly WO 2016/017648, would not necessarily possess the solubility parameters as now defined by the claims. Accordingly, rejection(s) based on the same fail. However, rejections will need to be reinstated upon removal of the above identified new matter from the claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to John Cooney whose telephone number is 571-272-1070. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F from 9 to 6. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Heidi Riviere Kelley, can be reached on 571-270-1831. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN M COONEY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1765
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 10, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Jun 19, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 23, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §112
Dec 23, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 28, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600558
AEROSOL CAN CONFIGURATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595348
High-strength eTPU
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595332
PREPARATION OF POLYURETHANE SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595347
HYDROFLUORO OLEFIN PROPELLANT IN A POLYURETHANE FOAM COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583992
COMPOSITE BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+26.4%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1045 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month