Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/634,690

UV stabilization of a cross-linkable polyolefin composition comprising an acidic silanol condensation catalyst

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 11, 2022
Examiner
NERANGIS, VICKEY M
Art Unit
1763
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
BOREALIS AG
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allow Rate
649 granted / 1152 resolved
-8.7% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
69 currently pending
Career history
1221
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
47.7%
+7.7% vs TC avg
§102
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1152 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/17/2025 has been entered. Response to Amendment The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior office action. All outstanding rejections, except for those maintained below, are withdrawn in light of applicant’s amendment filed on 12/17/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 1, 3, 5, 8-11, and 14-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chaudhary (WO 2019/027961) in view of Armitage (GB 9184654). With respect to claims 1, 3, 5, and 14-17, Chaudhary discloses an insulation or jacket layer for a coated wire cable prepared from a crosslinkable composition comprising a silane-functionalized polyolefin and 0-20 wt % of a silanol condensation catalyst (abstract), wherein the silanol condensation catalyst can be acidic (paragraph 0087). Inventive Example 1 includes 3 wt % of a catalyst masterbatch comprising 0.52 wt % dibutyltin dilaurate silanol condensation catalyst (paragraph 0189; Tables 1 and 2), which provides for an amount of silanol condensation catalyst of 0.016 wt %. Chaudhary discloses that an optional ultraviolet absorber or stabilizers (paragraph 0094) but fails to disclose that the UV stabilizer is a benzophenone in an amount of 0.0001-0.35 wt %. Armitage teaches that polyolefin compositions exhibit improved stability, light resistance, and reduced degradation by adding 0.0005-1 wt % of a hydroxybenzophenone compound, preferably having formulae PNG media_image1.png 88 434 media_image1.png Greyscale , wherein R is an alkyl or aryl hydrocarbon group containing 8-20 carbon atoms (page 1, lines 29-61). Armitage recommends the addition of antioxidant heat stabilizers (page 1, lines 62-82), which are not UV stabilizers. Given that Chaudhary teaches adding an appropriate ultraviolet absorber and further given that Armitage teaches that hydroxybenzophenones added in an amount of 0.0005-1 wt % are suitable UV stabilizers for polyolefin compositions, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize a known UV stabilizer to the polyolefin composition of Chaudhary. With respect to claim 8, the silane silane-functionalized polyolefin includes ethylene (paragraph 0051). With respect to claim 9, Chaudhary discloses that the silane-functionalized polyolefin contains 0.12 wt % silane (paragraph 0048). With respect to claims 10 and 11, Chaudhary teaches that the polyolefin can include up to 50 wt % of polar monomers such as alkyl acrylates and vinyl acetates (paragraph 0026). Claims 7, 12, and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chaudhary (WO 2019/027961) in view of Armitage (GB 9184654) and further in view of Nylander (US 2010/0267869). The discussion with respect to Chaudhary and Armitage in paragraph 5 above is incorporated here by reference. Chaudhary discloses an acidic silanol condensation catalyst such as exemplified dibutyltin dilaurate (paragraph 00189) but fails to disclose that the silanol condensation catalyst comprises an organic sulfonic acid comprising 10-200 carbon atoms and at least one aromatic group. Nylander discloses a UV stabilized crosslinkable polyolefin composition comprising a crosslinkable polyolefin with hydrolyzable silane groups and a silanol condensation catalyst (abstract) and teaches that preferred acidic silanol condensation catalysts are sulfonic acid and tin organic compounds (paragraph 0053), wherein the acidic catalysts allow crosslinking to quickly take place at room temperature (paragraph 0051). Particularly preferred is an organic aromatic sulfonic acid having 10-200 carbon atoms (paragraph 0059) having formula Ar(SO3H)x where x is at least one (paragraph 0056). The aromatic group Ar can be substituted with C1-C30 hydrocarbyl groups (paragraph 0058). Given that both Chaudhary and Nylander are drawn to a UV stabilized crosslinkable polyolefin composition comprising a crosslinkable polyolefin with hydrolyzable silane groups and a silanol condensation catalyst and further given that Nylander teaches that an advantageous acidic silanol condensation catalyst is a sulfonic acid compound like claimed, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the acidic silanol condensation catalyst of Nylander in the composition taught by Chaudhary. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/17/2025 have been fully considered but they are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection set forth above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VICKEY NERANGIS whose telephone number is (571)272-2701. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 am - 5:00 pm EST, Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Del Sole can be reached at (571)272-1130. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VICKEY NERANGIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1763 vn
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 11, 2022
Application Filed
May 30, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 30, 2024
Response Filed
Nov 07, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 13, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 10, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 25, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 19, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 17, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 19, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600812
DISPERSANTS MADE FROM ISOCYANATES AND AMINES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595377
RETROREFLECTIVE AQUEOUS PSEUDOPLASTIC GEL COMPOSITION FOR INDUSTRIAL SPRAYING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583980
Preparation Method of Super Absorbent Polymer
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570812
FIBER-REINFORCED MOLDED BODY AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING FIBER-REINFORCED MOLDED BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12559636
METHOD FOR TUNING GLOSS IN PAINT FORMULATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+28.5%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1152 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month