Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 17/636,889

Bra, Garment and Method

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 20, 2022
Priority
Sep 09, 2019 — GB 1912928.7 +1 more
Examiner
PREMRAJ, CATHERINE C
Art Unit
3794
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Prevayl Innovations Limited
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allowance Rate
115 granted / 204 resolved
-13.6% vs TC avg
Strong +48% interview lift
Without
With
+48.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 2m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
264
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
59.2%
+19.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
§112
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 204 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 16-20,22-24,26 and 28-32 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kurzweil et al., (US 20080287770; hereinafter Kurzweil) in view of Zhang, (US 20150335078). Regarding claim 16, Kurzweil (Figures 7 and 12) discloses a bra (100) for use in measuring biosignals of a wearer ([0022], [0063]), the bra (100) comprising: a front region (front middle portion between the two cup portions); a rear region (rear portion); a pair of side regions (right and left cup and side portions between the front region and the rear region) extending between the front region (front side) and the rear region (rear side); an underband (108) extending below a lower edge of the front region, rear region, and side regions ([0063]); and a measuring apparatus comprising an electronics module (150) and a sensor assembly (158) comprising one or more sensors (156) arranged to measure one or more biosignals of the wearer ([0076]), wherein one of the regions holding a respective sensor comprises a first layer of material (inner layer of material 20) and a second layer of material (outer layer of material 20) forming a space (18) arranged to removably receive the electronics module (150), and wherein the first layer of material (inner layer of material 20) comprises an inner surface and an outer surface, the inner surface facing the skin of the wearer in use, and wherein at least part of the sensor assembly (158) extends beyond the inner surface so as to bring the at least part of the sensor assembly (158) into contact with the skin of the wearer when worn to enable the one or more sensors (156) to perform a measurement of the wearer ([0080], [0082]-[0083]). Kurzweil fails to disclose wherein all of the sensor assembly is provided in the one of the side regions and is not provided in the underband. However, Zhang (Figure 15A) teaches a bra for use in measuring biosignals of a wearer ([0101]) comprising a front region (front middle portion between the two cup portions 10i’), a rear region (rear portion), and a pair of side regions (right and left cup 10i’ and side 15a’/15b’ portions between the front region and the rear region), wherein all of a sensor assembly (50a’+15a’ or 50b’+15b’) is provided in one of the side regions and is not provided in an underband (underband portion extending under the front, rear, and side regions as shown in Figure 15A), ([0100]-[0101]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Kurzweil to include all of the sensor assembly provided in the one of the side regions and not provided in the underband, as taught by Zhang, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. MPEP 2144.04(VI)(C). Regarding claim 17, Kurzweil (Figures 1 and 12) further discloses wherein the first layer of material (20) and the second layer of material (20) form a pocket (18), ([0080], [0082]-[0083]). Regarding claim 18, Kurzweil (Figures 1 and 12) further discloses wherein the pocket (18) is an elastically resilient pocket ([0080], [0082]-[0083]). Regarding claim 19, Kurzweil (Figures 1 and 12) further discloses wherein the pocket (18) is a hidden pocket ([0080], [0082]-[0083]). Regarding claim 20, Kurzweil (Figures 1 and 12) further discloses wherein the inside of the pocket (18) is accessible to provide access to an electronics module of the measuring apparatus ([0080], [0082]-[0083]). Regarding claim 22, Kurzweil (Figures 1 and 12) further discloses wherein the one or more sensors (156) are releasably connectable to the electronics module (150), ([0080], [0082]-[0083]). Regarding claim 23, Kurzweil/Zhang further teaches wherein the front region (front side) comprises a front panel and the rear region (rear side) comprises a rear panel, and the front panel and/or the rear panel extend into the side region, and the pocket (18) is provided on or in the panel or panels in the side region ([0080], [0082]-[0083]). Regarding claim 24, Kurzweil/Zhang further teaches wherein the side region comprises a side panel, and the pocket (18) is provided on or in the side panel ([0080], [0082]-[0083]). Regarding claim 26, Kurzweil (Figures 1 and 12) further discloses wherein the electronics module (150) and the sensor assembly (158) are electrically or wirelessly connected ([0080], [0082]-[0083]). Regarding claim 28, Kurzweil (Figures 1 and 12) further discloses wherein the one or more sensors (156) comprise one or more electrodes ([0080], [0082]-[0083]). Regarding claim 29, Kurzweil (Figures 1 and 12) further discloses wherein the measuring apparatus is configured to make one or more of the following measurements: electrocardiography; bioelectricity; bioimpedance ([0080], [0082]-[0083]). Regarding claim 30, Kurzweil/Zhang teaches a method of manufacturing a bra as claimed in claim 16, the method comprising the steps of: providing a bra (element 100 disclosed by Kurzweil; Figures 7 and 12) comprising: a front region (front middle portion between the two cup portions); a rear region (rear portion); a pair of side regions (right and left cup and side portions between the front region and the rear region) extending between the front region (front side) and the rear region (rear side); an underband (108) extending below a lower edge of the front region, rear region, and side regions ([0063]); and a measuring apparatus comprising an electronics module (150) and a sensor assembly (158) comprising one or more sensors (156) arranged to measure one or more biosignals of the wearer ([0076]); providing, in the one of the side regions, a first layer of material (inner layer of material 20) and a second layer of material (outer layer of material 20) forming a space (18) arranged for removably receiving the electronics module (150), wherein the first layer of material (inner layer of material 20) comprises an inner surface and an outer surface, the inner surface facing the skin of the wearer in use, and wherein at least part of the sensor assembly (158) extends beyond the inner surface so as to bring the at least part of the sensor assembly (158) into contact with the skin of the wearer when worn to enable the one or more sensors (156) to perform a measurement of the wearer ([0080], [0082]-[0083]). Kurzweil fails to disclose wherein all of the sensor assembly is provided in the one of the side regions and is not provided in the underband. However, Zhang (Figure 15A) teaches a bra for use in measuring biosignals of a wearer ([0101]) comprising a front region (front middle portion between the two cup portions 10i’), a rear region (rear portion), and a pair of side regions (right and left cup 10i’ and side 15a’/15b’ portions between the front region and the rear region), wherein all of a sensor assembly (50a’+15a’ or 50b’+15b’) is provided in the one of the side regions and is not provided in an underband (underband portion extending under the front, rear, and side regions as shown in Figure 15A), ([0100]-[0101]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Kurzweil to include all of the sensor assembly provided in the one of the side regions and not provided in the underband, as taught by Zhang, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. MPEP 2144.04(VI)(C). Regarding claim 31, Kurzweil (Figures 1 and 12) further discloses wherein the first layer of material (20) and the second layer of material (20) form a pocket (18), ([0080], [0082]-[0083]). Regarding claim 32, Kurzweil (Figures 1 and 12) further discloses wherein the pocket (18) is an elastically resilient pocket ([0080], [0082]-[0083]). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed 03/16/2026, have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of newly found prior art references Kurzweil, which teaches a base bra, and Zhang, which teaches providing all of a sensor assembly in one side region of a bra and not in an underband of the bra. In combination, the modified device/method teaches the invention as claimed at least in amended independent claims 16 and 30. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CATHERINE PREMRAJ whose telephone number is (571)272-8013. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Stoklosa can be reached at 571-272-1213. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.C.P./Examiner, Art Unit 3794 /EUN HWA KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3794
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Feb 20, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 02, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 17, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 10, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12661175
MEDICAL DEVICE WITH A BILATERAL JAW CONFIGURATION FOR NERVE STIMULATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12642570
ABLATION CATHETER WITH STRAIN GAUGES
9y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12642580
ELECTROSURGICAL DEVICES AND METHODS
4y 3m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12594035
ORAL APPLIANCE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SLEEP APNEA
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12564438
ENERGIZED CORERS WITH POWERED CONVEYING
4y 7m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+48.4%)
4y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 204 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month