Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/639,670

AIR VENT ASSEMBLY FOR A PUMP

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Mar 02, 2022
Examiner
HOWELL, GWYNNETH LINNEA
Art Unit
3785
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N V
OA Round
2 (Final)
40%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 1m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 40% of resolved cases
40%
Career Allow Rate
23 granted / 57 resolved
-29.6% vs TC avg
Strong +79% interview lift
Without
With
+79.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 1m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
93
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
40.7%
+0.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
§112
31.6%
-8.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 57 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment This office action is in response to preliminary amendment filed on 01/28/2026. As directed by the amendment, no claims were canceled, claims 1 and 11-15 were amended, and no claims were newly added. Thus, claims 1-15 are presently pending in this application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sokol et al. (US 2014/0259474; hereinafter “Sokol”). Regarding claim 1, Sokol discloses an air vent assembly comprising: a body (valve post 459), the body comprising: a first internal chamber ([0110] valve post 459 defines a cavity) arranged between an input port (fluid inlet 414) and an outlet port of the body (nozzle 428), wherein the first internal chamber is in fluid communication with the input port and the outlet port and arranged to receive a fluid or a gas ([0151] “a fluid flow pathway from the fluid inlet 414 to the nozzle 428 in the brush tip 325 is opened”… where fluid passes from fluid channel 396 into the cavity of valve body 459), the first internal chamber comprising: a first inner surface having a first inner surface portion (Annotated Fig. 15B below… internal inner surface of annular section of valve post 459) and a second inner surface portion (Annotated Fig. 15B below… internal inner surface of beveled section); and PNG media_image1.png 278 349 media_image1.png Greyscale a first valve (lower poppet 394; Fig. 15B) comprising an expandable element (lower poppet spring 393), the first valve arranged to receive the fluid or the gas and transition from an open state (attach base 318… [0151] lower poppet 394 is pushed away from a sealing position, compressing lower poppet spring 393… thus opening fluid flow path from inlet 414 to nozzle 428) to a closed state (remove base 318… [0156] lower poppet 394 is forced to seal post aperture 462 by the lower poppet spring 393”); an exit channel in fluid communication with the first internal chamber (channel within aperture 462), and arranged between the second inner surface portion of the first inner surface (channel within aperture 462 had fluid flow from the internal inner surface of beveled section towards it) and the outlet port (channel of aperture 462 leads fluid to nozzle 428), the exit channel having a first exit aperture (hole in aperture 462) arranged within the second inner surface portion of the first inner surface of the first internal chamber (Annotated Fig. 15B above shows inner surface of beveled section has the aperture 462 within it; [0111] “…the valve post 459 defining the post aperture 462”); wherein, in the closed state, the first valve is arranged to contact the first exit aperture and impede a flow of the fluid or gas into the exit channel ([0111] lower poppet 394 seals against aperture 462, impeding flow; also described in [0156]). Regarding claim 2, Sokol discloses wherein in the open state, the first valve is arranged at a distance from the first exit aperture of the exit channel and arranged to at least partially allow flow of the fluid or the gas into the exit channel ([0151] when the lower poppet 394 is pushed away [distanced], the fluid flow pathway from the fluid inlet 414 to nozzle 428 is open, meaning the aperture 462 and channel are allowing fluid flow). Regarding claim 3, Sokol discloses wherein in the open state, the fluid or the gas exerts a first pressure on the first valve (0151] open state compresses lower poppet spring 393 with a first pressure force), and wherein in the closed state the fluid or the gas exerts a second pressure on the first valve ([0156] removing base 318 applies second pressure to lower poppet spring 393 for extension). Regarding claim 4, Sokol discloses the first valve comprises the expandable element having an external surface (outer surface of lower poppet spring 393), wherein the external surface is arranged to contact at least a portion of an inner surface of a housing of the first valve (outer surface of lower poppet spring 393 contacts inside annular surface of lower poppet 394; Fig. 15B spring 393 goes through hole in poppet 394), and wherein an outer surface of the housing of the first valve is arranged to contact at least a portion of the first exit aperture of the exit channel in the closed state (sealing surface 464 touches aperture 462). Regarding claim 5, Sokol discloses the air vent body comprises one or more radially disposed cross channels (latch slots 458) arranged between the first valve and a first internal passage in fluid communication with the first valve (Fig. 18 inlet 414 directs fluid towards base cap 389 and base plate 390, which then travels up through first valve lower poppet 394), the first internal passage having a first end comprising the inlet port (inlet 414) and a second end comprising a lip (base cap 389 and base plate 390); wherein the cross channels are formed by indentations on the lip (Fig. 15B latch slots 458 on top of base cap 389), wherein the expandable element of the first valve and the housing of the first valve are arranged on the lip (spring alignment post 499 Fig. 15B on base plate 390); wherein the cross channels are in fluid communication with the first internal passage and the first internal chamber (underside of slots 458 and underside of inlet for chamber of valve post 489 are accepting the same fluid flow communication from base). Regarding claim 6, Sokol discloses the assembly body comprises a second internal chamber arranged between the exit channel and the outlet port and in fluid communication with the exit channel and the outlet port (chamber within fluid outlet 406, defined by conduit wall 405). Regarding claim 7, Sokol discloses the outlet port comprises a second valve (Fig. 15B upper poppet 412). Regarding claim 8, Sokol discloses the second internal chamber comprises a blocking element arranged between the exit channel and a second internal passage ([0117] upper poppet 412 positioned within fluid outlet 406; [0151] fluid passes through aperture 462 prior to fluid movement through upper poppet 412 apertures in regards to positioning between the previously defined exit channel and bobbin aperture 504), wherein the second internal passage has a first end in fluid communication with the second internal chamber and a second end in fluid communication with the outlet port (bobbin aperture 504; [0151] fluid passes bobbin aperture 504 to flow towards nozzle 428). Regarding claim 9, Sokol discloses the blocking element comprises a frustoconical flange portion arranged to prevent the fluid from flowing past the frustoconical flange portion (see Fig. 15B upper poppet 412 has a frustoconical flange, which is specifically beveled to form sealing surface 417 creating a fluid-tight seal). Regarding claim 10, Sokol discloses the blocking element comprises an inner portion arranged at a distance from the exit channel (post 419 is arranged inside poppet 412 above aperture 462). Regarding claim 11, Sokol discloses an oral irrigator system (Fig 12 sonic toothbrush and water flosser 110) comprising: a pump in fluid communication with a reservoir and a channel of the oral irrigator, the pump comprising a pump cylinder in which a pressurized flow is created ([0084] “the toothbrush/flosser device 110 may be connected with an irrigator hose 215 from a water flosser base unit (not shown) having a fluid reservoir and pump to provide a pulsating, high pressure water flow to the irrigator tip 228”; high pressure flow means a pressurized flow is created via a pump cylinder); an air vent assembly having an input port in fluid communication with the pump cylinder ([0097] “A fluid inlet 414 may extend from a portion of the removable base 318 for connection with a hose (not shown) that is connected to a water flosser base unit (not shown). “); wherein the air vent assembly comprises: a body (valve post 459), the body comprising: a first internal chamber ([0110] valve post 459 defines a cavity) arranged between the input port (fluid inlet 414) and an outlet port of the body (nozzle 428), wherein the first internal chamber is in fluid communication with the input port and the outlet port and arranged to receive a fluid or a gas ([0151] “a fluid flow pathway from the fluid inlet 414 to the nozzle 428 in the brush tip 325 is opened”… where fluid passes from fluid channel 396 into the cavity of valve body 459), the first internal chamber comprising: a first inner surface having a first inner surface portion (Annotated Fig. 15B above… internal inner surface of annular section of valve post 459) and a second inner surface portion (Annotated Fig. 15B above… internal inner surface of beveled section); and a first valve (lower poppet 394; Fig. 15B ) comprising an expandable element (lower poppet spring 393), the first valve arranged to receive the fluid or the gas and transition from an open state (attach base 318… [0151] lower poppet 394 is pushed away from a sealing position, compressing lower poppet spring 393… thus opening fluid flow path from inlet 414 to nozzle 428) to a closed state (remove base 318… [0156] lower poppet 394 is forced to seal post aperture 462 by the lower poppet spring 393”); an exit channel in fluid communication with the first internal chamber (channel within aperture 462), and arranged between the second inner surface portion of the first inner surface (channel within aperture 462 had fluid flow from the internal inner surface of beveled section towards it) and the outlet port (channel of aperture 462 leads fluid to nozzle 428), the exit channel having a first exit aperture (hole in aperture 462) arranged within the second inner surface portion of the first inner surface of the first internal chamber (Annotated Fig. 15B above shows inner surface of beveled section has the aperture 462 within it; [0111] “…the valve post 459 defining the post aperture 462”); wherein, in the closed state, the first valve is arranged to contact the first exit aperture and impede a flow of the fluid or gas into the exit channel ([0111] lower poppet 394 seals against aperture 462, impeding flow; also described in [0156]). Regarding claim 12, Sokol discloses in the open state, the first valve is arranged at a distance from the first exit aperture of the exit channel and arranged to at least partially allow flow of the fluid or the gas into the exit channel (see rejection to claim 2 above; [0151] when the lower poppet 394 is pushed away [distanced], the fluid flow pathway from the fluid inlet 414 to nozzle 428 is open, meaning the aperture 462 and channel are allowing fluid flow). Regarding claim 13, Sokol discloses the first valve comprises the expandable element having an external surface (see rejection to claim 4 above; outer surface of lower poppet spring 393), wherein the external surface is arranged to contact at least a portion of an inner surface of a housing of the first valve (outer surface of lower poppet spring 393 contacts inside annular surface of lower poppet 394; Fig. 15B spring 393 goes through hole in poppet 394), and wherein an outer surface of the housing of the first valve is arranged to contact at least a portion of the first exit aperture of the exit channel in the closed state (sealing surface 464 touches aperture 462). Regarding claim 14, Sokol discloses the assembly body comprises one or more radially disposed cross channels (see rejection to claim 5 above; latch slots 458) arranged between the first valve and a first internal passage in fluid communication with the first valve (Fig. 18 inlet 414 directs fluid towards base cap 389 and base plate 390, which then travels up through first valve lower poppet 394), the first internal passage having a first end comprising the inlet port (inlet port 414) and a second end comprising a lip (base cap 389 and base plate 390); wherein the cross channels are formed by indentations on the lip (Fig. 15B latch slots 458 on top of base cap 389), wherein the expandable element of the first valve and the housing of the first valve are arranged on the lip (spring alignment post 499 Fig. 15B on base plate 390); wherein the cross channels are in fluid communication with the first internal passage and the first internal chamber (underside of slots 458 and underside of inlet for chamber of valve post 489 are accepting the same fluid flow communication from base). Regarding claim 15, Sokol discloses the assembly body comprises a second internal chamber arranged between the exit channel and the outlet port and in fluid communication with the exit channel and the outlet port (see rejection to claim 6 above; chamber within fluid outlet 406, defined by conduit wall 405), and wherein the second internal chamber comprises a blocking element arranged between the exit channel and a second internal passage (see rejection to claim 8 above; [0117] upper poppet 412 positioned within fluid outlet 406; [0151] fluid passes through aperture 462 prior to fluid movement through upper poppet 412 apertures in regards to positioning between the previously defined exit channel and bobbin aperture 504), wherein the second internal passage has a first end in fluid communication with the second internal chamber and a second end in fluid communication with the outlet port (bobbin aperture 504; [0151] fluid passes bobbin aperture 504 to flow towards nozzle 428). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 01/28/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues, on pages 8-9 of the remarks, regarding the rejection to claims 1 and 11 that “the claims require a valve whose state transition (open to closed) is driven by pressures P1/P2 of the received fluid/gas, via expansion of an "expandable element" whose external surface is arranged to contact an inner surface of a valve housing, and where a housing outer surface seals the exit aperture in the closed state”. However, Examiner disagrees that this is what the claim requires. The language from claim 1 lines 9-11 is “a first valve comprising an expandable element, the first valve arranged to receive the fluid or the gas and transition from an open state to a closed state”. The expandable element is not claimed as a structure changed by the pressure of the fluid/gas, and the valve itself is claimed to firstly, receive fluid or gas, and secondly, transition from an open and closed state. Therefore, the rejection still stands. Applicant argues, on pages 9-10 of the remarks, that “Sokol does not disclose the claimed "expandable element" that expands due to fluid or gas pressure and whose external surface is "arranged to contact" an inner surface of a valve housing to effect sealing”. However, Examiner disagrees that the expandable element is a structure that requires fluid or gas pressure to expand, as is argued in the paragraph above. Furthermore, the language of the claim regarding “arranged to contact” is actually in claim 4 of the rejection. However, in Sokol, the lower poppet spring 393 (expandable element) is located within the lower poppet valve 394 (first valve), and paragraph [0111] states “A top end of the lower poppet spring 393 seats within a cylindrical cavity 500 in the bottom of the lower poppet 394”. Thus, the expandable element, spring 393 of Sokol, does contact the inner surface of the first valve, poppet 393 of Sokol, as evidenced. Therefore, the rejection still stands. Applicant argues, on page 10 of the remarks, that “The independent claims require the valve "receives the fluid or the gas and transition[s] from an open state to a closed state " under pressures P1/P2 applied by the flowing medium (SPEC [0042] "first pressure P1," [0043] "second pressure P2")”. However, Examiner notes that the actual claim language from claim 1 lines 9-11 as written do not claim the detail of pressures P1/P2, etc., presented in the arguments. The rejection to claims 1 and 11 above reject the claim language as presented since the features “arranged to receive the fluid or gas” and “transition from an open state to a closed state” are separated by the term “and”. The first valve as evidenced by Sokol reads on the claim as written. Therefore, the rejection still stands. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GWYNNETH L HOWELL whose telephone number is (703)756-4742. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-4:30 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tim Stanis can be reached at (571) 272-5139. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GWYNNETH L HOWELL/Examiner, Art Unit 3785 /RACHEL T SIPPEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3785
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 02, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 28, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582789
MODULAR ORO-NASAL PATIENT INTERFACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576225
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING RESPIRATORY THERAPY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569641
LEAKAGE VALVE AND VENTILATION TUBE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12527929
RESPIRATORY THERAPY APPARATUS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12521298
WEARABLE LOWER EXTREMITY EXOSKELETON
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
40%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+79.4%)
4y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 57 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month