Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/640,645

THERAPEUTIC DRUG FOR POLYCYTHEMIA

Final Rejection §112§DP
Filed
Mar 04, 2022
Examiner
LU, CHENG
Art Unit
1642
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Juntendo Educational Foundation
OA Round
2 (Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allow Rate
111 granted / 202 resolved
-5.0% vs TC avg
Strong +67% interview lift
Without
With
+67.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
64 currently pending
Career history
266
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
§102
13.0%
-27.0% vs TC avg
§112
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 202 resolved cases

Office Action

§112 §DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION The amendment filed October 23, 2025 in response to the Office Action of April 24, 2025 is acknowledged and has been entered. Claims 1-3, 5, 7, 8 and 12-20 have been amended. Claims 4, 6 and 9-11 have been cancelled. Claims 1-3, 5, 7, 8 and 12-20 are currently under consideration as drawn to the elected invention. The amended claims recite a method of treating polycythemia in a subject comprising administering to the subject an antibody comprising the specific HCDRs: 1-2-3 and LCDRs: 4-5-6 combination. It is noted that although the prior art teaches the antibody with the specific CDR combination and the usage of the antibody for cancer treatment, the prior art does not explicitly teach that the specific antibody has activity to treat polycythemia alone or in combination with another polycythemia treatment method. It is acknowledged that the instant application shows the activity of antibody TfR436, which comprises the recited CDRs, in treating polycythemia, see Examples 3-5. Taken together, in view of the claim amendments and applicant’s arguments, the 112(b), 112(a), 102, 103 and Double Patenting rejections set forth in the previous Office Action of April 24, 2025 are hereby withdrawn. In view of the specification, the amendments of October 23, 2025, the objection to the specification set forth in the previous Office Action of April 24, 2025 is hereby withdrawn. NEW OBJECTION AND REJECTION Claim Objections Claim 14 is objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate of claim 5. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 7, 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 7 recites “a peptide comprising CDR”, which renders the claim indefinite. Claim 7 depends on claim 1 and claim 1 recites three heavy chain CDRs and three light chain CDRs of the claimed antibody. It is not clear whether the CDR in the term “a peptide comprising CDR” refers to CDRs recited by claim 1 or encompass other CDRs. Similarly, claims 19 and 20 also recite “a peptide comprising CDR”. Because these claims depend on claim 1, and claim 1 recites three heavy chain CDRs and three light chain CDRs of the claimed antibody. It is not clear whether the CDR in the term “a peptide comprising CDR” refers to CDRs recited by claim 1 or encompass other CDRs. Conclusion Claims 1-3, 5, 8, 12, 13 and 15-18 are drawn to allowable subject matters. Claims 7, 19, 20 are rejected. Claim 14 is objected. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHENG LU whose telephone number is (571)272-0334. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Samira Jean-Louis can be reached at (571)270-3503. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHENG LU/Examiner, Art Unit 1642 /SAMIRA J JEAN-LOUIS/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 04, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112, §DP
Sep 12, 2025
Interview Requested
Sep 18, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 23, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 05, 2026
Final Rejection — §112, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12583939
BISPECIFIC ANTIGEN BINDING MOLECULES THAT BIND HER2, AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570765
Trispecific T cell Engagers
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565537
COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS TARGETING THE NUCLEOTIDE FREE STATE OF RAS TO BLOCK ONCOGENIC SIGNALING AND TRANSFORMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12559719
Engineered Expression of Cell Surface and Secreted Sialidase by CAR T Cells for Increased Efficacy in Solid Tumors
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12552873
ANTI-PSGL-1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR MODULATING MYELOID CELL INFLAMMATORY PHENOTYPES AND USES THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+67.0%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 202 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month