Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 17/641,108

Optical Imaging Lens Assembly

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 08, 2022
Examiner
PULLIAM, CHRISTYANN R
Art Unit
2178
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Zhejiang Sunny Optics Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
41%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
5y 4m
To Grant
65%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 41% of resolved cases
41%
Career Allow Rate
96 granted / 232 resolved
-13.6% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
5y 4m
Avg Prosecution
142 currently pending
Career history
374
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
§103
43.5%
+3.5% vs TC avg
§102
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
§112
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 232 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 3/08/2022 and 9/01/2024 complies with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-9, 11, 12, and 14-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Liu (CN 209297020 N). An English machine translation has been provided for the foreign patent publication. Regarding claim 1, Liu discloses an optical imaging lens assembly (Fig 1, [0008], imaging assembly), sequentially comprising from an object side to an image side along an optical axis (Fig 1, [0008]): a first lens (L1) with a positive refractive power ([0102]), an object-side surface thereof is a convex surface (Fig 1), and an image-side surface thereof is a concave surface (Fig 1); a second lens (L2) with a negative refractive power ([0102]); a third lens (L3) with a refractive power ([0102]); a fourth lens (L4) with a positive refractive power ([0102]); and a fifth lens (L5) with a negative refractive power ([0102]); wherein VP is an on-axis distance from an intersection point of a straight line where a marginal ray of the optical imaging lens assembly is located and the optical axis to the object-side surface of the first lens, and VP satisfies 0mm < VP < 1.5mm (Table 1, VP is 0.99mm and within the claimed range). Regarding claim 2, Liu discloses wherein an effective focal length f4 of the fourth lens and an effective focal length f1 of the first lens satisfy 1.0<f4/f1<1.4 (Table 1, calculated to be f4/f1 is 1.09 and within the claimed range). Regarding claim 3, Liu discloses wherein an effective focal length f2 of the second lens, an effective focal length f5 of the fifth lens and a total effective focal length f of the optical imaging lens assembly satisfy 1.4<(f5-f2)/f<1.8 (Table 1, calculated to be (f5-f2)/f is 1.78 and within the claimed range). Regarding claim 4, Liu discloses wherein TTL is a distance from the object-side surface of the first lens to an imaging surface of the optical imaging lens assembly on the optical axis, ImgH is a half of a diagonal length of an effective pixel region on the imaging surface, and TTL and ImgH satisfy TTL/ImgH<1.3 (Table 1, calculated to be TTL/ImgH is 1.23 and within the claimed range). Regarding claim 5, Liu discloses wherein FOV is a maximum field of view of the optical imaging lens assembly, and FOV satisfies 82°<FOV<87° (Table 1, calculated to be 85° and within the claimed range). Regarding claim 6, Liu discloses wherein EPD is an Entrance Pupil Diameter of the optical imaging lens assembly, ImgH is a half of a diagonal length of an effective pixel region on an imaging surface of the optical imaging lens assembly, and EPD and ImgH satisfy 0.4<EPD/ImgH<0.6 (Table 1, calculated to be EPD/ImgH is 0.52 and within the claimed range). Regarding claim 7, Liu discloses wherein a curvature radius R1 of the object-side surface of the first lens, a curvature radius R2 of the image-side surface of the first lens, a curvature radius R3 of an object-side surface of the second lens and a curvature radius R4 of an image-side surface of the second lens satisfy 1.9<(R3+R4)/(R1 +R2)<2.6 (Table 1, calculated to be (R3+R4)/(R1 +R2) is 2.18 and within the claimed range). Regarding claim 8, Liu discloses wherein a total effective focal length f of the optical imaging lens assembly, a curvature radius R8 of an image-side surface of the fourth lens and a curvature radius R10 of an image-side surface of the fifth lens satisfy 0.7<(R10-R8)/f<1.2 (Table 1, calculated to be (R10-R8)/f is 0.81 and within the claimed range). Regarding claim 9, Liu discloses wherein a spacing distance T34 of the third lens and the fourth lens on the optical axis, a center thickness CT4 of the fourth lens on the optical axis, a spacing distance T45 of the fourth lens and the fifth lens on the optical axis and a center thickness CT5 of the fifth lens on the optical axis satisfy 1.0<(T34+CT4)/(T45+CT5)<1.3 (Table 1, calculated to be (T34+CT4)/(T45+CT5) is 1.18 and within the claimed range). Regarding claim 11, Liu discloses wherein a combined focal length f12 of the first lens and the second lens, a center thickness CT1 of the first lens on the optical axis and a center thickness CT2 of the second lens on the optical axis satisfy 6.0<f12(CT1+CT2)<6.5 (Table 6, calculated to be f12(CT1+CT2) is 6.07 and within the claimed range). Regarding claim 12, Liu discloses wherein a window diameter DW of the optical imaging lens assembly satisfies 1.5mm < DW < 2.0mm (Table 6, calculated to be DW is 1.95mm and within the claimed range). Regarding claim 14, Liu discloses an optical imaging lens assembly (Fig 5, [0008], imaging assembly), sequentially comprising from an object side to an image side along an optical axis (Fig 5, [0157]): a first lens (L1) with a positive refractive power ([0157]), an object-side surface thereof is a convex surface (Fig 5), and an image-side surface thereof is a concave surface (Fig 5); a second lens (L2) with a negative refractive power ([0157]); a third lens (L3) with a refractive power ([0157]); a fourth lens (L4) with a positive refractive power ([0157]); and a fifth lens (L5) with a negative refractive power ([0157]); wherein a window diameter DW of the optical imaging lens assembly satisfies 1.5mm<DW<2.0mm (Table 6, calculated to be DW is 1.95mm and within the claimed range). Regarding claim 15, Liu discloses wherein an effective focal length f4 of the fourth lens and an effective focal length f1 of the first lens satisfy 1.0<f4/f1<1.4 (Table 1, calculated to be f4/f1 is 1.09 and within the claimed range). Regarding claim 16, Liu discloses wherein an effective focal length f2 of the second lens, an effective focal length f5 of the fifth lens and a total effective focal length f of the optical imaging lens assembly satisfy 1.4<(f5-f2)/f<1.8 (Table 1, calculated to be (f5-f2)/f is 1.78 and within the claimed range). Regarding claim 17, Liu discloses wherein TTL is a distance from the object-side surface of the first lens to an imaging surface of the optical imaging lens assembly on the optical axis, ImgH is a half of a diagonal length of an effective pixel region on the imaging surface, and TTL and ImgH satisfy TTL/ImgH<1.3 (Table 1, calculated to be TTL/ImgH is 1.23 and within the claimed range). Regarding claim 18, Liu discloses wherein FOV is a maximum field of view of the optical imaging lens assembly, and FOV satisfies 82°<FOV<87° (Table 1, calculated to be 85° and within the claimed range). Regarding claim 19, Liu discloses wherein EPD is an Entrance Pupil Diameter of the optical imaging lens assembly, ImgH is a half of a diagonal length of an effective pixel region on an imaging surface of the optical imaging lens assembly, and EPD and ImgH satisfy 0.4<EPD/ImgH<0.6 (Table 1, calculated to be EPD/ImgH is 0.52 and within the claimed range). Regarding claim 20, Liu discloses wherein a curvature radius R1 of the object-side surface of the first lens, a curvature radius R2 of the image-side surface of the first lens, a curvature radius R3 of an object-side surface of the second lens and a curvature radius R4 of an image-side surface of the second lens satisfy 1.9<(R3+R4)/(R1 +R2)<2.6 (Table 1, calculated to be (R3+R4)/(R1 +R2) is 2.18 and within the claimed range). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10 and 13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: with respect to the allowable subject matter, none of the prior art either alone or in combination disclose or teach of the claimed combination of limitations to warrant a rejection under 35 USC 102 or 103. Specifically, with respect to dependent claim 10, the prior art of Liu taken either singly or in combination with any other prior art fails to suggest such an optical imaging lens assembly comprising: “wherein ImgH is a half of a diagonal length of an effective pixel region on an imaging surface of the optical imaging lens assembly, and an effective semi-diameter DT11 of the object-side surface of the first lens and ImgH satisfy 2.3<10 x DT11/ImgH<2.8”. Specifically, with respect to dependent claim 13, the prior art of Liu taken either singly or in combination with any other prior art fails to suggest such an optical imaging lens assembly comprising: “wherein SAG51 is an on-axis distance from an intersection point of an object-side surface of the fifth lens and the optical axis to an effective radius vertex of the object-side surface of the fifth lens, SAG52 is an on-axis distance from an intersection point of an image-side surface of the fifth lens and the optical axis to an effective radius vertex of the image-side surface of the fifth lens, and SAG51 and SAG52 satisfy 0.7< SAG52/SAG51 <0.9”. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Chen (20210116683) and Zhang (20200409117) are examples of a five lens optical assembly providing a lens system with high image quality. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHARRIEF I BROOME whose telephone number is (571)272-3454. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-5pm, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Mack can be reached on 571-272-2333. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHARRIEF I BROOME/Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 08, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 08, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 04, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Dec 01, 2024
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12247323
Continuous Preparation Method of Cellulose Fibers
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 11, 2025
Patent 9271028
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DECODING A DATA STREAM IN AUDIO VIDEO STREAMING SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 23, 2016
Patent 8239350
DATE AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 07, 2012
Patent 8229899
REMOTE ACCESS AGENT FOR CACHING IN A SAN FILE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 24, 2012
Patent 8209280
EXPOSING MULTIDIMENSONAL CALCULATIONS THROUGH A RELATIONAL DATABASE SERVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 26, 2012
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
41%
Grant Probability
65%
With Interview (+23.9%)
5y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 232 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month