Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/641,946

ABSORBENT ARTICLE

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Jul 13, 2022
Examiner
ANDERSON, CATHARINE L
Art Unit
3781
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Daio Paper Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allow Rate
704 granted / 1076 resolved
-4.6% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1119
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
50.4%
+10.4% vs TC avg
§102
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§112
17.3%
-22.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1076 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 22 August 2025 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed 22 August 2025 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 and 3-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the absorber side" in line 9. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is also unclear if this limitation refers to a side of the absorber, a side of the side sheet, or a side of a layer between the side sheet and the absorber. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the center side" in lines 14-15. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 5 recites the limitation "left and right compressed grooves" in lines 3. Previously, only compressed grooves were disclosed. It is unclear if this limitation is intended to further limit the previously disclosed compressed grooves, or to refer to additional compressed grooves. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 and 3-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nishitani et al. (9,029,626) in view of Fujioka et al. (8,216,206) and Nakanishi et al. (5,201,727). With respect to claim 1, Nishitani discloses an absorbent article, as shown in figure 1, comprising an absorber 30, side sheets 41 and 42 on a skin-contact surface side over an entire length, and a pair of wing-shaped flaps 61 and 62 protruding outward in a width direction to be fixed to an undergarment in a region S corresponding to a body fluid discharge portion of a wearer, as shown in figure 2. The side sheets 41 and 42 comprise a non-adhesive portion extending between 51ff/52ff and 51rf/52rf in which a center portion of the side sheets is not bonded to the absorber side in a longitudinal section including the region S, as shown in figure 1 and disclosed in column 5, lines 13-15. The side sheets further comprise an adhesive portion 51f/r and 52f/r in which the side sheets are bonded to the absorber side, as disclosed in column 5, lines 4-6, at an outer side and both ends of the non-adhesive portion, as shown in figures 1 and 2. An edge of the side sheets 41 and 42 is located to the center side in the width direction from a side edge 31 and 32 of the absorber 30, as shown in figure 1. The adhesive portion adjacent the outer side of the non-adhesive portion has an edge in the width direction provided in a position in the vicinity of the side edge of the absorber 30, as shown in figure 2. The absorber 30 has a constricted portion 31 and 32 constricted into an arc shape inward in the width direction on both sides in the longitudinal section including the region S, as shown in figure 1. The edge of the adhesive portion is provided in a position overlapped to a narrowest portion of the constricted portion 31 and 32, as shown in figure 1. Nishitani discloses all aspects of the claimed invention with the exception of the side sheets not including an elastically stretchable member, and a wing displacement prevention adhesive layer with a side edge at an inner side that coincides with a virtual line linking the side edges of the absorber in the constricted portion. Fukioka discloses an absorbent article having side sheets 8, as shown in figure 1, and discloses in column 1, lines 19-23, that elastically stretchable members in side sheets cause discomfort to a wearer. Fukioka teaches the use of side sheets that do not include elastically stretchable members improve feeling to the wearer, as disclosed in column 1, lines 25-28. It would therefore have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make side sheets of Nishitani that do not include an elastically stretchable member, as taught by Fukioka, to improve the comfort and feel to the wearer. Nakanishi discloses an absorbent article having a pair of wing-shaped flaps 5, as shown in figure 2. The wing-shaped flaps are provided with a wing displacement prevention adhesive layer 6, as shown in figure 2, which has a side edge at an inner side that coincides with the side edge of the absorber 4, as shown in figures 1b and 2. Nakanishi teaches that the wing prevention adhesive layer allows the article to be fixed to undergarments irrespective of the shape of the undergarment, as disclosed in column 3, lines 6-10. It would therefore have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the wing-shaped flaps of Nishitani with a wing displacement adhesive layer that coincides with a side edge of the absorber, as taught by Nakanishi, to allow the article to be securely fixed to different shapes of undergarments. Since the side edges of the absorber of Nishitani have a constricted portion in the region of the flaps, when modified by the teaching of Nakanishi, the side edge of the inner side of the adhesive layer will coincide with a virtual line linking the side edges of the absorber in the front and back of the constricted portion. With respect to claim 3, Nishitani further discloses compressed grooved 101, 102, 201, and 202 dented toward a non-skin side and formed on a skin-contact surface of a main body part in which the absorber 30 is interposed, as shown in figure 2. The compressed grooves are formed on both side portions of the longitudinal section in a region M corresponding to the body fluid discharge portion of a wearer and in a planar shape bulge to an outer side in the width direction, as shown in figure 1. With respect to claim 4, a maximum bulging portion of each compressed groove 101, 102, 201, and 202 of Nishitani is provided in a position coinciding with the longitudinal direction L of the article, as shown in figure 1. With respect to claim 5, rigidity of the absorber 30 at the outer side S1 and S2 of the compressed groove 201 and 202 is set to be lower than rigidity of the absorber 30 between the compressed grooves, as disclosed in column 6, lines 47-50. With respect to claim 6, a center portion of the wing-shaped flap 61 and 62 and a center portion of the non-adhesive portion are provided in the position M coinciding with the longitudinal direction L of the article, as shown in figure 1. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. U.S. Patents 5,387,210; 5,752,947; 7,122,713; and 7,550,646 disclose absorbent articles having side sheets. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LYNNE ANDERSON whose telephone number is (571)272-4932. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sarah Al-Hashimi can be reached at 571-272-7159. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CATHARINE L ANDERSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3781
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 13, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 10, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 26, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Nov 19, 2024
Response Filed
Feb 19, 2025
Final Rejection — §103, §112
May 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 22, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 25, 2025
Interview Requested
Aug 25, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 02, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 02, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594198
DISPOSABLE WEARING ARTICLE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12582806
Female Catheter Guide
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575977
Composition for wet indicator
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575545
PET DIAPER AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12558273
BREATHABLE ABSORBENT ARTICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+20.8%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1076 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month