Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/645,252

COMPOSITE STRUCTURED LAMINATE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Dec 20, 2021
Priority
Dec 21, 2020 — provisional 63/199,357
Examiner
GILLETT, JENNIFER ANN
Art Unit
1789
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Horton World Solutions LLC
OA Round
8 (Final)
29%
Grant Probability
At Risk
9-10
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
66%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 29% of cases
29%
Career Allowance Rate
94 granted / 329 resolved
-36.4% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+37.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 2m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
390
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
92.1%
+52.1% vs TC avg
§102
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 329 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Amendments to claims 1, 11, and 25 and the addition of claims 26-28, in the response filed December 29, 2025, have been entered. Claims 1, 3-5, 7, 10-11, 13-15, 17, and 20-28 are currently pending in the above identified applications. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1, 3-5, 7, 10-11, 13-15, 17, and 20-28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. PNG media_image1.png 358 608 media_image1.png Greyscale [AltContent: connector]Specifically, there is no support for the limitation “wherein the fibers in the plurality of fibers are non-overlapping with each other.” There is no explicit support in the originally field disclosure for this limitation. There is no mention of overlapping or non-overlapping fibers in the originally filed disclosure. In the Remarks filed December 29, 2025, Applicant points to pages 11-12 and Fig. 6A to support the fibers being non-overlapping. This portion does not provide explicit support for the non-overlapping fibers. The portion does support the fibers in the plurality of fibers being randomly oriented and distributed in the polymer mixture. The portion also discusses Fig. 6A, which is described as “the internal layer 504 from a top-down view.” Fig. 6A is drawing is a simplified illustration and a representation of the invention. The Fig. 6A is also a two-dimensional representation and does not show the entirety of the composite laminate. The fiber orientation also seem to favor the 604 axis direction. The singular, two-dimensional drawing does not support the fibers in the plurality of fiber being non-overlapping with each other, which implies in all planes and locations within the composite laminate, not a singular cross section. For example, if taken along the dotted line shown below, the fibers would contain points of overlapping in the view. Therefore, the claim amendment introduces new matter. It is also unclear if the strength properties in claims 27 and 28 would be present in the composite laminate if the fibers of the plurality of fibers are non-overlapping. To overcome this rejection, applicant may attempt to demonstrate that the original disclosure establishes that he or she was in possession of the amended claim or remove this limitation. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed December 29, 2025 have been fully considered but are moot based upon the new grounds of rejection. The amendments to the claims overcomes the prior art rejections contained in December 29, 2025, however, introduces a new matter issue as discussed above. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JENNIFER ANN GILLETT whose telephone number is (571)270-0556. The examiner can normally be reached 7 AM- 4:30 PM EST M-H. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marla McConnell can be reached on 571-270-7692. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JENNIFER A GILLETT/Examiner, Art Unit 1789
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 15 earlier events
Apr 16, 2025
Interview Requested
Apr 22, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 23, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
May 06, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
May 07, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 29, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677891
GLOVE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING GLOVE
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12662424
REINFORCEMENT BAR AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12623972
PREPREG FOR CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITE
3y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12595391
Flame-retardant cable with self-extinguishing coating layer
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12577707
ARTIFICIAL HAIR FIBER
3y 1m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

9-10
Expected OA Rounds
29%
Grant Probability
66%
With Interview (+37.6%)
4y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 329 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month