Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/650,347

Lidar Authentication

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 08, 2022
Examiner
ALGIBHAH, HAMZA N
Art Unit
2441
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Osram GmbH
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
566 granted / 713 resolved
+21.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
744
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
§103
50.2%
+10.2% vs TC avg
§102
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 713 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Details Claims 1-4, 7-11 and 13-15 are pending. Claims 1-4, 7-11 and 13-15 are rejected. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4, 7-11 and 13-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ferreira et al (Pub. No.: US 2020/0284883 A1) in view of Ayers (Pub. No.: US 2022/0043459 A1) and HUANGFU (Pub. No.: US 2020/0067920 A1). As per claim 1, Ferreira discloses a LIDAR device (Ferreira, Fig 1, Fig 108, paragraph 1696-1697, 3085, wherein the components described herein may be combined together or may be included separately in a LIDAR system (e.g., in a LIDAR device)) comprising: - an optoelectronic component (Ferreira, paragraph 0034-0035, wherein “The LIDAR Sensor System may comprise at least one light module. Said one light module has a light source and a driver connected to the light source. The LIDAR Sensor System further has an interface unit, in particular a hardware interface, configured to receive, emit, and/or store data signals. The interface unit may connect to the driver and/or to the light source for controlling the operation state of the driver and/or the operation of the light source. The light source may be configured to emit radiation in the visible and/or the non-visible spectral range, as for example in the far-red range of the electromagnetic spectrum. It may be configured to emit monochromatic laser light. The light source may be an integral part of the LIDAR Sensor System as well as a remote yet connected element. It may be placed in various geometrical patterns, distance pitches and may be configured for alternating of color or wavelength emission or intensity or beam angle.”)- a standard communication interface (Ferreira, paragraph 3062, 0393, 4382, wherein the Retrofit LIDAR sensor device may be further equipped with BLUETOOTH functions and/or Wi-Fi functions. By this, communication to external devices like a Smartphone or a car radio may be established. By way of example, the optical communication channel may be used for exchange of sensitive information (e.g. key exchange or safety critical information, for example authentication data), e.g. the optical communication channel may be used in conjunction with the radio-based channel for authentication and key exchange.);- an optical communication interface (Ferreira, paragraph 4382, wherein by way of example, the optical communication channel may be used for exchange of sensitive information (e.g. key exchange or safety critical information, for example authentication data), e.g. the optical communication channel may be used in conjunction with the radio-based channel for authentication and key exchange. This may increase the security of the communication, similar to a 2-factor-authentification (illustratively, communication over two different media));- a processing circuit (Ferreira, Fig 108, paragraph 1696-1697) configured to: - (Ferreira, paragraph 1892, 5417, 6218 wherein from time to time, the LIDAR sensor system may additionally be upgraded with upgrade parameters loaded into the firmware of the LIDAR sensor system 5900. These upgrade parameters may modify the field of view 5912 or laser beam profile, or they may upgrade the configuration of the spatial light modulator 5910. As such, the spatial light modulator 5910 may be optimized from time to time in order to achieve an optimal laser beam profile. Thus, the receiving ); - generate an authentication code (Ferreira, paragraph 4382, wherein “by way of example, the optical communication channel may be used for exchange of sensitive information (e.g. key exchange or safety critical information, for example authentication data)”; wherein the authentication data/ key exchange that is exchanged using the optical communication channel can be the generated authentication code);- encode the authentication code (Ferreira, paragraph 4382, wherein “by way of example, the optical communication channel may be used for exchange of sensitive information (e.g. key exchange or safety critical information, for example authentication data)”; wherein the authentication data/ key exchange that is exchanged using the optical communication channel is encoded in the format (light) for it to be exchanged using the optical communication channel);- generate instructions to control the optoelectronic component to emit a light signal in accordance with the encoded authentication code (Ferreira, paragraph 4382, wherein “by way of example, the optical communication channel may be used for exchange of sensitive information (e.g. key exchange or safety critical information, for example authentication data)”; wherein the authentication data/ key exchange that is exchanged using the optical communication channel is encoded in the format (light) for it to be exchanged using the optical communication channel); and - authenticate (Ferreira, paragraph 4382, wherein by way of example, the optical communication channel may be used for exchange of sensitive information (e.g. key exchange or safety critical information, for example authentication data), e.g. the optical communication channel may be used in conjunction with the radio-based channel for authentication and key exchange. This may increase the security of the communication, similar to a 2-factor-authentification (illustratively, communication over two different media)), wherein the optical communication interface is provided by the optoelectronic component (Ferreira, paragraph 4709, 4381-4382 wherein By way of example, the optical communication channel may be used for exchange of sensitive information (e.g. key exchange or safety critical information, for example authentication data), e.g. the optical communication channel may be used in conjunction with the radio-based channel for authentication and key exchange. This may increase the security of the communication, similar to a 2-factor-authentification (illustratively, communication over two different media)). Ferreira teaches modifying the software of the LIDAR device from time to time but does not explicitly disclose to receive a request to perform the modification. However, performing software modification/updating/upgrading in response to a request is well known in the art. For example, Ayers discloses to receive a request (Ayers, paragraph 0051, wherein EEMS 6 may transmit requests for sensor data, firmware updates, or other data to monitoring devices 33). Therefore, it would have it would have been obvious to one ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Ferreira such that a request is received to modify the software as claimed because this would have provided a way to upgrade/update. modify LIDAR devices only when the user is interested.Ferreira and Ayers do not explicitly disclose wherein the authentication code comprises a random number, and/or wherein the authentication code comprises at least one of a serial number associated with the LIDAR device, lifetime information associated with the LIDAR device, or geographical information associated with the LIDAR device. However, using a random number and/or a serial number as an authentication code is well known in the art. For example, HUANGFU discloses wherein the authentication code comprises a random number (HUANGFU, paragraph 0029-0030, 0034-0035, wherein “In one embodiment, the networking authentication information may include characters. As shown in FIG. 3, in the method of the embodiment, the step of determining the light emission control signal corresponding to the networking authentication information based on the preset rule may be implemented by step 301. In step 301, the characters in the networking authentication information are converted into corresponding light emission control signals by a Morse code rule or an American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII) rule, wherein the converting the characters in the networking authentication information into the corresponding light emission control signals by the Morse code rule refers to the above-described conversion process of, e.g., the character a and the character b. For converting the characters in the networking authentication information into corresponding light emission control signals by the ASCII rule, different combinations of 0 and 1 may be used to correspond to different characters, and 0 and 1 in the characters may correspond to the short-time light emission and the period-of-time light emission, respectively”; “In one embodiment, the networking authentication information may include at least one of a networking password, a networking service set identification and a running parameter”; wherein it is well known to provide a random characters as a network password). Therefore, it would have it would have been obvious to one ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Ferreira and Ayers using HUANGFU such that the authentication code is a random number and or a serial number as claimed because this would have provided a way to allow converting the authentication code into a light emission control signal quickly and conveniently (see HUANGFU paragraph 0034). As per claim 2, claim 1 is incorporated and Ferreira further discloses wherein the standard communication interface comprises one of a wired communication interface or a radio-based wireless communication interface (Ferreira, paragraph 0010, 0074, 0362,4329, 4381, wherein The LIDAR Sensor System therefore may have a data interface to receive the measured values and/or data. The data interface may be provided for wire-bound transmission or wireless transmission); As per claim 3, claim 1 is incorporated and Ferreira further discloses wherein the optoelectronic component comprises a light source configured to emit a light signal (Ferreira, Fig 133D, 133E, paragraph 1257, wherein LIDAR system 12000 may include at least one light source 42. The light source 42 may be configured to emit light, e.g. a light signal (e.g., to generate a light beam 12008). The light source 42 may be configured to emit light having a predefined wavelength, e.g. in a predefined wavelength range. For example, the light source 42 may be configured to emit light in the infra-red and/or near infra-red range (for example in the range from about 700 nm to about 5000 nm, for example in the range from about 860 nm to about 2000 nm, for example 905 nm). The light source 42 may be configured to emit LIDAR light (e.g., the light signal may be LIDAR light). The light source 42 may include a light source and/or optics for emitting light in a directional manner, for example for emitting collimated light (e.g., for emitting laser light). The light source 42 may be configured to emit light in a continuous manner and/or it may be configured to emit light in a pulsed manner (e.g., to emit a sequence of light pulses, such as a sequence of laser pulses)), and wherein the optical communication interface is provided at least in part by a modulation of the light source to provide the light signal (Ferreira, Fig 133D, 133E, paragraph 3358, 3367 wherein LIDAR system may be configured to superimpose a modulation on the emitted light (e.g., on the emitted light signals, such as on emitted light pulses), such that crosstalk in the whole image resolution may be reduced or substantially eliminated.); As per claim 4, claim 1 is incorporated and Ferreira further discloses wherein the optoelectronic component comprises a sensing element configured to provide a received light signal (Ferreira, paragraph 3389, wherein the LIDAR system may include a sensor (e.g., the LIDAR sensor 52). The sensor may be configured to provide a sensor signal (e.g., an electrical signal, such as a current) representing a received light signal (e.g., a main signal and a superimposed modulation)), and wherein the optical communication interface is defined at least in part by a demodulation of the light signal received at the sensing element (Ferreira, paragraph 3529, 4380 wherein the term “signal demodulation” (also referred to as “electrical demodulation”) may be used to describe a decoding of data from a signal (e.g., from a light signal, such as a light pulse). Electrical modulation may be referred to in the following as modulation, where appropriate. Electrical demodulation may be referred to in the following as demodulation, where appropriate. Illustratively, in the context of the present application, the modulation performed by a signal modulator may be a signal modulation (e.g., an electrical modulation), and a demodulation performed by one or more processors may be a signal demodulation (e.g., an electrical demodulation)); As per claim 7, claim 1 is incorporated and Ferreira further discloses wherein the processing circuit is further configured to: receive an authentication response message, compare a content of the authentication response message with an authentication code, and authorize the request for the software modification in accordance with a result of the comparison (Ferreira, Fig 183-185, paragraph 5093-5094, 5119 wherein if the vehicle 18302 (e.g. the car) has the pre-shared (cryptographic, e.g. symmetric) key (“Yes” in 18504), the vehicle 18302 (e.g. the car) may generate a random number RN_C and further generates a random number message including the random number RN_C and sends the random number message via the OBB communication channel 18314 to the parking lot 18304 in 18508. In case the vehicle 18302 (e.g. the car) does not receive a further random number RN_P from the parking lot 18304 via the OBB communication channel 18314 (see FIG. 184) (this is checked in 18510)—“No” in 18510—the vehicle 18302 (e.g. the car) assumes that the parking lot 18304 (communication peer) does not require mutual authentication and performs the authentication process as described further below continuing in 18514 In case the vehicle 18302 (e.g. the car) receives and decodes the further random number RN_P from the parking lot 18304 via the Lidar-based OOB communication channel 18314 (“Yes” in 18510), the vehicle 18302 (e.g. the car) assumes that the parking lot 18304 requires mutual authentication and generates and sends a first authentication message 1 to the parking lot 18304 via the in-band communication channel 18312 (in 18512). After having received and decoded a second authentication message 2 from the parking lot 18304 via in-band communication channel 18312 (in 18514), the vehicle 18302 (e.g. the car) may verify the second authentication message 2 in 18516. If the verification fails (“No” in 18516), the authentication has failed and the process is finished (e.g. by generating and sending a corresponding failure message to the parking lot 18304) in 18506. If the verification was successful (“Yes” in 18516), the vehicle 18302 allows a requested resource access by the parking lot 18304 (in general by the authenticated communication peer) in 18518. Then, the authentication process is successfully finished in 18520); Claims 8-11 and 15 are rejected under the same rationale as claims 1-9. As per claim 13, claim 1 is incorporated and Ferreira further discloses wherein the standard communication interface consists of a wired communication interface (Ferreira, paragraph 0074, wherein “The LIDAR Sensor System therefore may have a data interface to receive the measured values and/or data. The data interface may be provided for wire-bound transmission or wireless transmission”; paragraph 4382, wherein “by way of example, the optical communication channel may be used for exchange of sensitive information (e.g. key exchange or safety critical information, for example authentication data), e.g. the optical communication channel may be used in conjunction with the radio-based channel for authentication and key exchange”); As per claim 14, claim 1 is incorporated and Ferreira further discloses wherein the standard communication interface consists of a radio-based wireless communication interface (Ferreira, paragraph 0074, wherein “The LIDAR Sensor System therefore may have a data interface to receive the measured values and/or data. The data interface may be provided for wire-bound transmission or wireless transmission”; paragraph 4382, wherein “by way of example, the optical communication channel may be used for exchange of sensitive information (e.g. key exchange or safety critical information, for example authentication data), e.g. the optical communication channel may be used in conjunction with the radio-based channel for authentication and key exchange”); Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 09/25/2025 have been fully considered but are now moot in lights of the new mapping and/or new grounds of rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HAMZA N ALGIBHAH whose telephone number is (571)270-7212. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30 am - 3:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wing Chan can be reached at (571) 272-7493. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HAMZA N ALGIBHAH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2441
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 08, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 09, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 23, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Sep 25, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 23, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602224
NON-TERMINATING FIRMWARE UPDATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598111
ENABLING INTENT-BASED NETWORK MANAGEMENT WITH GENERATIVE AI AND DIGITAL TWINS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598656
METHOD FOR EDGE COMPUTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598096
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ACCESSING VIRTUAL MACHINE, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12528442
SYSTEM, METHOD, AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING VEHICLE DATA COLLECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+3.1%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 713 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month