Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/656,819

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR WIRELESS CONTROL OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROTHERAPY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 28, 2022
Priority
Mar 01, 2013 — provisional 61/771,636 +4 more
Examiner
EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT
Art Unit
3792
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Djo LLC
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
649 granted / 922 resolved
At TC average
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+35.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
963
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
59.3%
+19.3% vs TC avg
§102
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
§112
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 922 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 3-20, and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, line 21, “to deliver electrical pulses” is vague as the pulses have been previously recited in line 11 and it is unclear if the two are the same element or different elements. If the pulses in line 21 are the same as the pulses in line 11, then “to deliver the electrical pulses” should be used in line 21. Similarly, in the last paragraph, line 1, “to generate electrical pulses” is vague. In line 24, “via a set of lead wires” is vague and inferentially including the lead wires. It is suggested to first state the system has the lead wires before they are used to connect the electrodes. Similarly, claims 16 and 23 have these problems. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1, 3-20 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The subject matter which was not described in the original disclosure is the use of the first and second electrodes connected via a set of lead wires to the electronics layer, in combination with a conductive layer (i.e. snap, conductive contact pint, conductive zone, etc.) disposed below the nonconductive bottom layer and removably secured to the nonconductive bottom layer by snap connection, where the first and second electrodes and conductive layer/zone deliver the generated electrical pulses, in combination with the other elements or steps in the claim(s). The claims appear to be mixing different embodiments not disclosed in the original disclosure as usable together, and/or not disclosed as operating together with the method steps, or processor or button functions. The use of a conductive layer (i.e. snap, conductive contact pint, conductive zone, etc.) disposed below the nonconductive bottom layer and removably secured to the nonconductive bottom layer by snap connection for delivering the generated electrical pulses was disclosed in figure 2A and paragraphs 76-85, but that embodiment did not contain or disclose operating together with the use of two electrodes connected by lead wires (e.g. figure 4, etc.) and including electrode pads to also deliver the generated electrical pulses after the button was pressed. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claims have been considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection necessitated by amendment. Note that the argument that the claims are supported by paragraphs 6-188 and figures 1-18 (i.e. the entire disclosure) is not persuasive and does not specifically point out where the claim limitations are taught. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to George Robert Evanisko whose telephone number is (571)272-4945. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Klein can be reached on 571-270-5213. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /George R Evanisko/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3792 4/22/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Jul 28, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 31, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Aug 27, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 02, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 24, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636517
NON-ABLATIVE PHOTONIC DEVICES AND RELATED METHODS
3y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12616838
PATIENT SPECIFIC FREQUENCY MAPPING PROCEDURE FOR HEARING IMPLANT ELECTRODE ARRAYS
3y 2m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12616826
PUSH-PULL TIGHTENING PORT FOR PERCUTANEOUS CIRCULATORY SUPPORT DEVICE REPOSITIONING AND AXIAL LOCKING, AND ATTACHMENT TO SHEATH HUB
3y 2m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12616423
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ESTIMATING PHYSIOLOGICAL VARIABLES
3y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12611540
MODULATION OF GROWTH DIFFERENTIATION FACTOR 10 (GDF10)
3y 6m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+35.2%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 922 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month