Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/657,415

VEHICLE HIGH-VOLTAGE CHARGING SYSTEM USING A MOTOR DRIVING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 31, 2022
Examiner
KOUSAR, SADIA
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Delphi Technologies (Suzhou) Company Limited
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
69 granted / 109 resolved
-4.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
155
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
55.9%
+15.9% vs TC avg
§102
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
§112
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 109 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 01/15/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5, 7-8, 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being unpatentable by Chon et al. (US 2020/0361323), herein after Chon. Regarding claim 1, Chon discloses a vehicle high-voltage charging system using a motor driving system, the charging system (fig. 1) comprising: a power distribution unit including: a first relay (R3, fig. 1) having one end connected to a charging power input terminal and an opposite end (one end of the R3 is connected to the negative terminal of the power supply and the opposite end, fig. 1); and an integrated drive module separate from and external to the power distribution unit (see the annotated fig. 1), PNG media_image1.png 701 1016 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotated fig. I the integrated drive module including: an inverter (12, fig. 1) connected to a rechargeable battery (12 is connected to the battery 11, fig. 1); a motor (13, fig. 1) connectable to the inverter (13 is connected to 12, fig. 1) and configured to supply power, which is provided to a neutral point of the motor(paragraph [0039]-[0040]), to the inverter; a neutral point capacitor (Cnp, fig. 1) arranged on a by-pass path, wherein a first end of the by-pass path is connected to the neutral point and the charging power input terminal to which DC charging power is adaptable to input, and a second end of the by- pass path is connectable directly to the rechargeable battery and the opposite end of the first relay (see the annotated fig. II); and PNG media_image2.png 532 766 media_image2.png Greyscale Annotated fig. II a second relay (R2, fig. 1) arranged in the by-pass path and in series with the neutral point capacitor (R2 is connected in series with Cnp, fig. 1). Regarding claim 2, Chon further discloses wherein the second relay is positioned between the neutral point capacitor and the neutral point of the motor (R2 is connected between N point and Cnp, fig. 1). Regarding claim 3, Chon discloses wherein the neutral point capacitor (Cn, fig. 1) is positioned between the second relay and the neutral point of the motor (that Cnp below is positioned at the top end by the relay R2 and (through the switch S6) back to the neutral point at the bottom end, fig. 1). Regarding claim 5, Chon further discloses wherein the second relay is a semiconductor switch without contactors (R2 is a relay, paragraph [0038]; Note: a simple relay is a semiconductor switch without contactors). Regarding claim 7, Chon further discloses wherein the power distribution unit further includes a third relay having one end connected to the rechargeable battery and an opposite end connected to the charging power input terminal (R1 is connected to the battery and charging power input terminal, fig. 1). Regarding claim 8, Chon further discloses wherein the power distribution unit further includes a fourth relay having one end connected to the neutral point of the motor and the first end of the by-pass path and an opposite end connected to the charging power input terminal (R2 is connected to N point and the first end of the bypass path and charging input terminal, fig. 1). Regarding claim 10, Chon further discloses wherein the charging system is adapted to be used for 400V to 800V boost charging (paragraph [0004]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4, 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chon (US 2020/0361323) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Nishikawa et al. (US 2019/0351769), herein after Nishikawa. Regarding claim 4, Chon discloses the vehicle high-voltage charging system using a motor driving system according to claim 1. However, Chon is silent about the relay is a relay with solenoid and contactors. Nishikawa discloses the relay is a relay with solenoid and contactors (paragraph [0026] shows that the relay have the coils and contactors). It would have been obvious to the one of ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of claimed invention to modify Chon’s second relay with solenoid and contactors at taught by Nishikawa, in order to provides electrical isolation, allowing low-power, safe, and efficient control signals in high power charging system. Regarding claim 6, Chon discloses the vehicle high-voltage charging system using a motor driving system according to claim 1. However, Chon is silent about the semiconductor switch is a MOSFET switch. Nishikawa discloses the semiconductor switch is a MOSFET switch (paragraph [0026]). It would have been obvious to the one of ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of claimed invention to modify Chon’s relay as the semiconductor MOSFET switch as taught by Nishikawa, in order to have superior efficiency, high-speed switching (nanoseconds), and compact, lightweight, and reliable operation in the charging system. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SADIA KOUSAR whose telephone number is (571)272-3386. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7:30am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julian Huffman can be reached at (571) 272-2147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. SADIA . KOUSAR Examiner Art Unit 2859 /JULIAN D HUFFMAN/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 31, 2022
Application Filed
Dec 11, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 05, 2025
Response Filed
May 19, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jul 18, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 31, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 01, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Oct 15, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 21, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 18, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jan 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 15, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 24, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12580391
SYSTEM FOR CHARGING VEHICLE BATTERY USING MOTOR DRIVING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573859
Battery Pack, System, Operation Status Transmission Method And Program
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12556011
CHARGING PILE WITH PERMANENTLY-HORIZONTAL CHARGING BLOCK AND CHARGING DEVICE HAVING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12549025
BATTERY CONFIGURATION FOR GAS ENGINE REPLACEMENT DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12515544
LIGHT PIPE APPARATUS AND ASSOCIATED ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+9.4%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 109 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month