Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/662,004

MEDICAL DEVICE SYSTEMS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 04, 2022
Examiner
HENDERSON, RYAN N
Art Unit
3795
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 3m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
514 granted / 807 resolved
-6.3% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 3m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
853
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
34.6%
-5.4% vs TC avg
§102
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
§112
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 807 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Notice of Amendment The Amendment filed 10/14/2025 has been entered. Claims 1, 2, 4-6, 12, 13, 21-31 are pending in the application with claims 1, 2, 12, 13 amended, claim 4 withdrawn, claims 3, 7-11, 14-20 cancelled, and claims 21-31 newly added. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 4-6, 12, 13, 21-24, 26-29, 31 and 35 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Dillon et al. (US Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0057537, hereinafter Dillon). In regard to claim 1, Dillon discloses a medical system (Figs. 2A,2B), comprising: a first device (210) comprising a first handle (218), a first shaft (230) extending distally from the first handle, a first port (214), and a first actuator (212); a second device (240) comprising a second handle (248), a second shaft (250), a second port (port through which shaft (250) extends through, see Figs. 2A-2B), a third port (Figs. 2A-2B, 3 show additional ports (351), Par. 31), and a second actuator (242), wherein the second shaft extends into the second port and the third port is in fluid communication with a lumen of the second shaft (Figs. 2A-2B, Par. 28); wherein the second port and the third port extend radially outward from the second handle at approximately a same angle (Fig. 3 shows the second and third ports extending radially outward from the second handle at approximately a same angle); and a fixture for removably coupling the first device to the second device at the first port of the first handle (Par. 26, via removably attaching the second device to the port (214) of the first device, Figs. 2A-2B), wherein, in a configuration in which the second device is coupled to the first device: the fixture couples the first device to the second device so that the first handle is configured to be held in a first hand of an operator, while a second hand of the operator traverses between use of the first actuator and the second actuator (Figs. 2A, 2B, the devices are capable of being used to perform the claimed function), and the second shaft extends from the second port of the second device into the first port of the first device (Figs. 2A,2B). In regard to claim 2, Dillon teaches wherein, during use, the second shaft enters the first port of the first handle of the first device, the first device is closer to an operator than the second device, and the first actuator is below the second actuator (Figs. 2A-2B). In regard to claim 4, Dillon teaches wherein the first actuator lies on a first plane, the second actuator lies on a second plane, and the second plane is at an angle relative to said first plane, wherein the angle between the second plane and the first plane is between 5° and 70° (the second device can be connected to the first port (214) at different rotational angles, therefore adjusting the angle of the second actuator with respect to the first actuator). In regard to claim 5, Dillon teaches wherein the first actuator and the second actuator lie on a shared plane or parallel planes (the second device can be connected to the first port (214) at different rotational angles, therefore adjusting the angle of the second actuator with respect to the first actuator to lie on the same plane or parallel planes, Figs. 2A,2B). In regard to claim 6, Dillon teaches wherein the first actuator includes a first rotatable knob, the second actuator includes a second rotatable knob, and an axis of rotation of the first rotatable knob is within 2.75 inches of an axis of rotation of the second rotatable knob (the second device can be attached at different rotational orientations to the first port of the first device, such that at certain rotational orientations, the axis of the first and second rotatable knobs would converge towards each other such that the axis would be within 2.75 inches of each other, Figs. 2A,2B). In regard to claim 12, Dillon teaches wherein a portion of the second device is coupled to the first port (Figs. 2A,2B). In regard to claim 13, Dillon teaches wherein the second shaft of the second device is configured to extend from a proximal end at the second port to the second port (Figs. 2A,2B). In regard to claim 21, Dillon discloses a medical system (Figs. 2A,2B), comprising: a first device (210) comprising a first handle (218), a first shaft (230) extending distally from the first handle (214), a first port, and a first actuator (212); and a second device (240) comprising a second handle (248), a second port (port through which shaft (250) extends through, see Figs. 2A-2B), a third port (Figs. 2A-2B, 3 show additional ports (351), Par. 31), an anchor portion (Figs. 2A, 2B portion which removably attaches to first port (214), Par. 26), a second shaft (250), and a second actuator (242), wherein the second port and the third port extend radially outward from the second handle at approximately a same angle (Fig. 3 shows the second and third ports extending radially outward from the second handle at approximately a same angle); wherein, in a configuration in which the anchor portion is coupled to the first port, the second shaft extends into the second port of the second device and into the first port of the first device via the anchor portion such that the second shaft extends through a first lumen of the first shaft (Figs. 2A,2B), and wherein the third port of the second device is in fluid communication with a second lumen of the second shaft, such that an accessory device is insertable into the third port and extendable through the second lumen of the second shaft while the second shaft is within the first lumen of the first shaft (Figs. 2A-2B,3, Par. 31). In regard to claim 22, Dillon teaches wherein the anchor portion comprises a receiving end configured to be coupled with the first port of the first device (Figs. 2A,2B, Par. 26). In regard to claim 23, Dillon teaches wherein the receiving end is configured to couple to the first port via at least one of: (1) a clamp, (2) a frictional fit, or (3) adhesion (Dillon teaches of the second device being attached to the first port via a luer-lock connection, Par. 25). In regard to claim 24, Dillon teaches wherein, to extend the accessory device through the second lumen, the accessory device is extended through a body of the second handle (the accessory device extends through a body of the second handle when the accessory device extends through the second lumen, Figs. 2A-2B). In regard to claim 26, Dillon teaches wherein the first actuator lies on a first plane, wherein the second actuator lies on a second plane, and the second plane is at an angle of 5° to 70° relative to the first plane (the second device can be connected to the first port (214) at different rotational angles, therefore adjusting the plane and angle of the second actuator with respect to the first actuator). In regard to claim 27, Dillon teaches wherein the first actuator and the second actuator lie on a shared plane or parallel planes (the second device can be connected to the first port (214) at different rotational angles, therefore adjusting the angle of the second actuator with respect to the first actuator to lie on the same plane or parallel planes, Figs. 2A,2B). In regard to claim 28, Dillon teaches medical system (Figs. 2A,2B) comprising: a first device (210) comprising a first handle (218), a first shaft (230) extending distally from the first handle (212), and a first port (214), a second device (240) comprising a second handle (248), a second port (port through which shaft (250) extends through, see Figs. 2A-2B), a third port (Figs. 2A-2B, 3 show additional ports (351), Par. 31), and a second shaft (250), wherein the second port and the third port extend radially outward from the second handle at approximately a same angle (Fig. 3 shows the second and third ports extending radially outward from the second handle at approximately a same angle), wherein the second shaft extends through an opening in a body of the second handle and into the second port of the second device (see annotated Fig. 2B below), and wherein the third port of the second device is in fluid communication with a lumen of the second shaft; and wherein, in a configuration in which the second device is coupled to the first device, the second shaft extends through the first port and into a lumen of the first shaft (Figs. 2A-2B,3, Par. 31). PNG media_image1.png 752 864 media_image1.png Greyscale In regard to claim 29, Dillon teaches wherein the second handle includes an anchor portion for coupling to the first port (via luer lock connection for removably attaching the second port of the second device to the first port (214), Figs. 2A, 2B, Par. 25-26), and wherein the first port of the first device is in fluid communication with the second port of the second device via the anchor portion (Fig. 3). In regard to claim 31, Dillon teaches wherein the second port and the third port of the second device are positioned in the same plane or in a same plane (Figs. 2A,2B). In regard to claim 33, Dillon teaches wherein each of the second port and the third port extends from a same, first side surface of the second handle (Figs. 2A,2B illustrate the second and third ports each extend from a proximal surface of the second handle). In regard to claim 34, Dillon teaches wherein the first side surface of the second handle is opposite to a second side surface of the handle that faces the first handle (Figs. 2A,2B illustrate the first and second handle have side surface that face each other). In regard to claim 35, Dillon teaches wherein the second port and the third port are adjacent to one another (Figs. 2A,2B illustrate the second and third ports adjacent one another at a proximal end of the second handle) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dillon et al. (US Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0057537, hereinafter Dillon) in view of Okada et al. (US Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0090709, hereinafter Okada). In regard to claim 32, Dillon is silent with respect to wherein the second actuator is a steering knob, and wherein an outer entrance of each of the second port and the third port is distal to at least a portion of the steering knob. Okada teaches an analogous endoscope comprising a handle (11) having bending controls (35LR, 35UD, 36, 37) and a plurality of instrument ports (39a, 39b) distally disposed of the bending controls (Fig. 4). The instrument ports (39a, 39b) extending at approximately the same angle from the handle and allow instruments to be inserted through separate channels within the endoscope. It would’ve been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to modify the second and third ports of Dillon to be positioned distally of the bending controls and extending at approximately the same angle as taught by Okada as a matter of design choice for allowing a surgeon to advance various surgical instruments through the instrument ports to a distal end of the endoscope. There being no unexpected results in modifying the second and third ports of Dillon for the instrument port configuration of Okada. Response to Arguments Applicant argues Dillon fails to teach the feature of “wherein the second port and the third port extend radially outward from the second handle at approximately a same angle”. The examiner disagrees since Fig. 3 shows the second and third ports extending radially outward from the second handle at approximately a same angle. Further, since the claim uses the term approximately, the angles do not need to be identical, but merely close. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RYAN N HENDERSON whose telephone number is (571)270-1430. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6am-5pm (PST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anhtuan Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-4963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RYAN N HENDERSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3795 March 21, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 04, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Oct 14, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 14, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jan 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599298
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING PHYSICAL CONTACT OF A SURGICAL INSTRUMENT WITH PATIENT TISSUE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588804
ENDOSCOPE BENDING SECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12543931
ENDOSCOPE CONTROL UNIT WITH BRAKING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12543928
ELEVATOR FOR DIRECTING MEDICAL TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12539019
A HANDLE FOR AN ENDOSCOPE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+17.9%)
4y 3m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 807 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month