Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/664,339

GASTRIC PLACEMENT CONFIRMATION DEVICE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
May 20, 2022
Examiner
GOLLAMUDI, NEERAJA
Art Unit
3783
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Regents Of The University Of Minnesota
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
110 granted / 153 resolved
+1.9% vs TC avg
Strong +42% interview lift
Without
With
+42.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
204
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
48.8%
+8.8% vs TC avg
§102
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 153 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Interpretation The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(f): (f) Element in Claim for a Combination. – An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. This application includes one or more claim limitations that do not use the word “means,” but are nonetheless being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation(s) uses a generic placeholder that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structural modifier. Such claim limitation(s) is/are: “a sensing device” in claim 1, “a first sensing device” and “a second sensing device” in claim 5. Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are being interpreted to cover the corresponding structure described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof. Instant Paragraph [0028] teaches the sensing device is a pH paper or any other material or device. If applicant does not intend to have this/these limitation(s) interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, applicant may: (1) amend the claim limitation(s) to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph (e.g., by reciting sufficient structure to perform the claimed function); or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitation(s) recite(s) sufficient structure to perform the claimed function so as to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 4, 6 and 8-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Babb et al. (US Patent 5291879 hereinafter “Babb”). Regarding Claim 1, Babb teaches (Figs 4-6) a device comprising: a housing (82, 90, 92) defining an outer surface (outer surface of 82), a first end (94), and a second end (96), the housing comprising an inner passage (inner passage defined by walls 124) that extends from the first end of the housing to the second end of the housing, wherein the outer surface comprises a curved planar surface (see annotated Fig 6) that curves inward towards the inner passage, wherein the curved planar outer surface defines an aperture (see annotated Fig 6; aperture is opening in passage towards 112) in fluid communication with a portion of the inner passage (passage defined by walls 124); a stylet (See Col 13 line 65 – Col 14 line 3 teaching how a airway hose is attached; this is interpreted to be a stylet) coupled to the first end (94) of the housing, the stylet defining a channel (Channel is lumen of the hose as described in Col 13 line 65-Col 14 line 3) in fluid communication with the inner passage (passage defined by walls 124); and a sensing device (102, 104, 112) configured to be placed on the curved planar surface of the housing and cover the aperture (see annotated Fig 6; the sensing device partially covers the aperture and is placed on the curved planar surface), the sensing device being configured to detect a property of fluid within the inner passage (See Col 16 line 65 – Col 17 line 2 teaches how the sensing device detects CO2 within the fluid of the inner passage 124). PNG media_image1.png 259 586 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotated Fig 6 (Babb) Regarding Claim 2, Babb teaches the device of claim 1, further comprising a cover (86) that retains the sensing device (102, 104, 112) against the aperture (See annotated Fig 6; also see Fig 4). As to Claim 3, Babb teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the curved planar surface (See annotated Fig 6) is curved inward towards the inner passage (see annotated Fig 6) in a direction from the first end (See annotated Fig 6.2) to the second end (See annotated Fig 6.2) such that a cross section of the housing at the first end is larger than a cross section of the housing at the aperture defined by the curved planar surface (See annotated Fig 6.2) PNG media_image2.png 259 588 media_image2.png Greyscale Annotated Fig 6.2 (Babb) Regarding Claim 4, Babb teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the inner passage (passage defined by walls 124) curves outward from a central axis of the housing to approach the outer surface and the aperture (see Fig 6, passage curved outwards towards 112, where the aperture and outer surface is located; also see Col 16 line 65 – Col 17 line 2 teaching how 124 diverts flow towards the sensor). Regarding Claim 6, Babb teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the inner passage (passage defined by 124) is defined by one or more inner walls of the housing (See Fig 6, passage is also defined by inner wall of 90 and 92 which is considered a part of the housing). Regarding Claim 8, Babb teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the sensing device comprises pH paper (See Col 10 line 66 teaching pH sensitive indicators are used in the device; this is considered a pH paper). Regarding Claim 9, Babb teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the housing (92, 90, 82) comprises a cylindrical shape (See 92 and 90 in Fig 4, both are cylindrical portions), and wherein a portion (90, 92) of the outer surface (outer surface of 92, 90, 82) separate from the curved planar surface (See annotated Fig 6) defines the cylindrical shape (See Figs 4-6; portions 92 and 90 are the cylindrical shape, sperate from the outer curved portion annotated in Fig 6 which is part of 82). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Babb (US Patent Pub. 5291879) in view of Gilbert (US Patent 9173602 hereinafter “Gilbert”) Regarding Claim 7, Babb teaches all elements of claim 1 as described above. Babb does not specify the device wherein the housing comprises one or more tubes disposed within an inner wall of the housing, and wherein the one or more tubes define the inner passage. Gilbert teaches (Fig 82) a housing (8210) with a tube (conduit 8212) disposed within an inner wall of the housing (8210) defining the inner passage (see Col 51 lines 36-39 “The body 8210 defines an interior lumen or conduit 8212 extending from a first end fluid opening 8218 second end fluid opening 8220, allowing fluid flow therethrough from one of the ends to the other.”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the inner passage of Babb with a tube as shown in Gilbert. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize this as another structure that allows for the same result of fluid flow from one end to the other (Gilbert Col 51 lines 36-39). Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Babb (US Patent Pub. 5291879) in view of Brown (US Patent 5259399) Regarding Claim 10, Babb teaches all elements of claim 1 as described above. Babb does not specify the device wherein the stylet is configured to be inserted into a tube of a gastrostomy button, the stylet being more rigid than the tube of the gastrostomy button. Brown teaches a hollow stylet (13) configured to be inserted into a gastrostomy tube (2), wherein the stylet is more rigid than the tube (Brown Col 6 lines 1-19). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the stylet of Babb such that it could be inserted into a gastrostomy tube as taught by Brown. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to do so in order to use this device in a procedure located in the stomach. Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Babb (US Patent Pub. 5291879) in view of Gilbert (US Patent Pub. 20110077495) hereinafter “Gilbert ‘495”). Regarding Claim 20, Babb teaches (Figs 4-6) a system comprising: a device (fig 4) comprising: a housing (82, 90, 92) defining an outer surface (outer surface of 82), a first end (94), and a second end (96), the housing comprising an inner passage (inner passage defined by walls 124) that extends from the first end (94) of the housing to the second end (96) of the housing, wherein the outer surface comprises a curved planar surface (see annotated Fig 6) that curves inward towards the inner passage, wherein the curved planar outer surface defines an aperture (see annotated Fig 6; aperture is opening in passage towards 112) in fluid communication with a portion of the inner passage (passage defined by walls 124); a stylet (See Col 13 line 65 – Col 14 line 3 teaching how an airway hose is attached; this is interpreted to be a stylet) coupled to the first end (94) of the housing, the stylet defining a channel (Channel is lumen of the hose as described in Col 13 line 65-Col 14 line 3) in fluid communication with the inner passage (passage defined by walls 124); and a sensing device (102, 104, 112) configured to be placed on the curved planar surface of the housing and cover the aperture (see annotated Fig 6; the sensing device partially covers the aperture and is placed on the curved planar surface), the sensing device being configured to detect a property of fluid within the inner passage (See Col 16 line 65 – Col 17 line 2 teaches how the sensing device detects CO2 within the fluid of the inner passage 124). Babb does not specify a syringe configured to couple to the second end of the housing, wherein the syringe is configured to withdraw fluid through the inner passage and to the aperture in response to withdrawal of a plunger within the syringe. Gilbert ‘495 teaches a system comprising: a device comprising: a housing (5502) defining an outer surface, a first end (5540), and a second end (5550), the housing (5502) comprising an inner passage (5506, 5514, 5518, 5520) that extends from the first end (5540) of the housing to the second end (5550) of the housing, wherein the outer surface defines an aperture (5508, 5510) in fluid communication with a portion (5506, 5514) of the inner passage (5506, 5514, 5518, 5520); a sensing device (5504, 5530) configured to cover the aperture (see [0208] "The detection indicator 5504 is configured to abut the detection opening to provide the contact between the fluid and the detection indicator 5504. In one example, the detection indicator 5504 is configured to provide a seal against the detection opening to prevent leakage of the fluid to an exterior of the housing 5502."; also see [0216] and [0217]), the sensing device (5504, 5530) configured to detect a property of fluid within the inner passage (see [0205] "The detection indicator 5504 in one example is analogous to the chemical-property indicating medium or indicating elements described above. For example, the detection indicator is configured to change from a first visual indication to a second visual indication upon contact with a fluid or fluid sample based on a characteristic of the fluid."); and a syringe (see [0215] “In a further implementation, the housing 5502 comprises a second opening 5550 configured to removably engage with a fluid retrieval component 5802 (e.g., a syringe, suction pump, wall suction or vacuum system) for retrieving the fluid from a distal end of the lumen into the interior chamber 5506.”) configured to couple to the second end (5550) of the housing (5502), wherein the syringe is configured to withdraw fluid through the inner passage and to the aperture in response to withdrawal of a plunger within the syringe (see [0213] In a further implementation, the housing 5502 comprises a second opening 5550 configured to removably engage with a fluid retrieval component 5802 (e.g., a syringe, suction pump, wall suction or vacuum system) for retrieving the fluid from a distal end of the lumen into the interior chamber 5506.”; also see Fig 61 showing an example of a possible a syringe with a plunger that could be used). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the system of Babb such that it includes a syringe configured to couple to the second end of the housing, wherein the syringe is configured to withdraw fluid through the inner passage and to the aperture in response to withdrawal of a plunger within the syringe as taught by Gilbert ‘495. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to do so in order to retrieve fluid into the passageway of the system (See Gilbert ‘495 [0213]). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 5 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. As to Claim 5, Babb teaches all elements of claim 4 as described above. Babb does not specify the device wherein: the aperture is a first aperture, the sensing device is a first sensing device, and the portion of the inner passage is a first portion, the inner passage comprises the first portion that curves outward in a first direction from the central axis of the housing to approach a first portion of the outer surface and the first aperture, and wherein the inner passage comprises a second portion that curves outward in a second direction from the central axis of the housing to approach a second portion of the outer surface and a second aperture in fluid communication with the second portion of the inner passage, the sensing device is a first sensing device and the property of the fluid is a first property of the fluid, and the device comprises a second sensing device configured to cover the second aperture and detect a second property of the fluid within the second portion of the inner passage. Furthermore, no art was found that would have made it obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to modify Babb to satisfy these limitations. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 and 12 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NEERAJA GOLLAMUDI whose telephone number is (571)272-6449. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Tsai can be reached at (571) 270-5246. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NEERAJA GOLLAMUDI/Examiner, Art Unit 3783 /WESLEY G HARRIS/Examiner, Art Unit 3783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 20, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Nov 21, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582809
TREATMENT OF A DISEASE OF THE GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT WITH A PDE4 INHIBITOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576245
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ANCHORING MEDICAL DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12508399
MANUFACTURE OF STEERABLE DELIVERY DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12508423
Device For Tissue Electrotransfer Using A Microelectrode
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12485278
ELECTROPORATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+42.2%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 153 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month