Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/675,088

SINGLE-BEAM DOUBLE-PHYSICAL-EFFECT COORDINATING AND DISTRIBUTING METHOD APPLICABLE TO UNIFORM LASER SHOCK AND APPLICATION THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 18, 2022
Examiner
ROSARIO-APONTE, ALBA T
Art Unit
3761
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Shandong University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 1m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allow Rate
253 granted / 467 resolved
-15.8% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 1m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
515
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
43.1%
+3.1% vs TC avg
§102
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
§112
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 467 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 1, 2, 4 and 6-8 are objected to because of the following informalities: all quotations (“”) should be removed from the claims. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, the limitation “obtaining a change law of the liquid constraint layer feature…, on a basis of the change on a basis of the change law obtained in step S7, obtaining an adjusting principle of a liquid constraint layer feature condition…in step S7, in a case of controlling other liquid constraint layer feature conditions to be unchanged, an influence law of the single liquid constraint layer feature condition on the change of the occurring intensity ratio of "plasma shock" to "cavitation" is obtained” is unclear what is “a change law of the liquid constraint layer feature” and how it is obtained? What is “an influence law of the single liquid constraint layer feature condition” and how it is obtained? Claims 2-8 are rejected due to their dependency from claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-8 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: allowable subject matter is indicated for claims 1-8 because even though LU (CN 111074061) teaches adjusting a liquid constraint layer thickness for laser shock peening, the prior art of record does not show or fairly suggest a single-beam double-physical-effect coordinating and distributing method applicable to uniform laser shock comprising obtaining a change law of the liquid constraint layer feature when an occurring intensity ratio of "plasma shock" to a "cavitation" effect is transformed from 1:0 to 0.5:0.5 in a mode of controlling a variable; and on a basis of the change law obtained in step S7, obtaining an adjusting principle of a liquid constraint layer feature condition needing to be changed when taking laser shock uniform peening in a multiple spot region as a target as recited in claim 1. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: CN 106435158, CN 105246640 and CN 110026686. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALBA T ROSARIO-APONTE whose telephone number is (571)272-9325. The examiner can normally be reached M to F; 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Crabb can be reached at 571-270-5095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALBA T ROSARIO-APONTE/Examiner, Art Unit 3761 02/06/2026 /STEVEN W CRABB/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3761
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 18, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599984
FASTENING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594631
LASER MACHINING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12576462
METHOD OF PROCESSING PLATE-SHAPED WORKPIECE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12551962
ENGINE-DRIVEN AIR COMPRESSOR/GENERATOR LOAD PRIORITY CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12543884
REUSABLE BREW BASKET AND BREWING MACHINE ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+27.0%)
4y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 467 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month