Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/684,735

ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT MATERIALS AND DEVICES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 02, 2022
Examiner
YANG, JAY LEE
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORPORATION
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
659 granted / 893 resolved
+8.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
78 currently pending
Career history
971
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
52.8%
+12.8% vs TC avg
§102
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
§112
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 893 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 01/09/26 has been entered. Response to Amendment The rejection of Claims 9-13, 15, and 21 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention as set forth in the Final Rejection filed 09/15/25 is overcome by the Applicant’s amendments. The rejection of Claim 22 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention as set forth in the Final Rejection filed 09/15/25 is overcome by the cancellation of the claim. The rejection of Claims 1, 2, 4-13, 15, 17, 18, 20, 21, 23, and 24 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention as set forth in the Final Rejection filed 09/15/25 is overcome by the Applicant’s amendments. The rejection of Claim 22 under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends as set forth in the Final Rejection filed 09/15/25 is overcome by the cancellation of the claim. The rejection of Claim 22 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Min et al. (US 2021/0043856 A1) as set forth in the Final Rejection filed 09/15/25 is overcome by the cancellation of the claim. The rejection of Claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Min et al. (US 2021/0043856 A1) as set forth in the Final Rejection filed 09/15/25 is overcome by the Applicant’s amendments. The rejection of Claims 1, 2, 4-6, 9-13, 17, 18, 20, and 24 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Min et al. (US 2021/0043856 A1) as set forth in the Final Rejection filed 09/15/25 is overcome by the Applicant’s amendments. Claim Objections Claims 9-13 and 15 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 9, which the other claims are dependent upon, recites the structure Formula II which is graphically unclear due to its small size and low resolution. The structure needs to be replaced by a structure of larger size and solid lines for the bonds, atoms, and variable groups. Appropriate correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter 12. Claims 1, 2, 4-8, 17, 18, 20, 21, and 23-25 are allowed. Furthermore, Claims 9-13 and 15 are currently objected to due to minor informalities, but would be allowable if amended to overcome the objection as set forth above. The closet prior art is provided by Min et al. (US 2021/0043856 A1), which discloses the following metal complexes comprising carbene ligands of the following form: PNG media_image1.png 294 384 media_image1.png Greyscale ([0044]) where X41 and X44 may each be N ([0067]). An embodiment is disclosed: PNG media_image2.png 270 402 media_image2.png Greyscale (page 29). However, it is the position of the Office that neither Min et al. singly nor in further combination with any other prior art discloses any of the compounds comprising ligand LA as recited in the claims, particularly in regards to the nature of R1 in combination with at least one of conditions (i)-(v) being true. Response to Arguments 13. Applicant’s arguments on pages 78-81 with respect to the deficiencies of the previously cited prior art in view of the newly amended claims have been fully considered and are persuasive. Hence, the previous rejections have been withdrawn. Conclusion 14. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAY L YANG whose telephone number is (571)270-1137. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri, 6am-3pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer A Boyd can be reached at 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAY YANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 02, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 30, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 10, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 18, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 18, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 09, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604660
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598906
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT MATERIALS AND DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590101
COMPOUND FOR ORGANIC OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE, COMPOSITION FOR ORGANIC OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE AND ORGANIC OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590085
Organic Light Emitting Compound And Organic Light Emitting Device Including Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588407
ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+2.9%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 893 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month