Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 17/704,992

PRECAST CLADDING PANELS WITH PROFILED PANEL EDGES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 25, 2022
Examiner
TRAN, PHI DIEU
Art Unit
3633
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
701 granted / 1070 resolved
+13.5% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1112
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
46.0%
+6.0% vs TC avg
§102
35.0%
-5.0% vs TC avg
§112
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1070 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/17/2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 9-15 are is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Olezyk et al (9464442) in view of Peck (2021922). Olezyk et al (figures 5b) shows an assembly of two precast exterior cladding panels (102), each of said cladding precast concrete exterior panels having an outer panel face, an inner panel face, an upper panel edge, and a lower panel edge, wherein, when viewed in transverse cross section, the upper panel edge having a surface with a concave protrusion, the lower panel edge having a convex groove and is matingly engageable with the convex upper profile of the upper panel edge, said two precast concrete exterior cladding panels being mounted one above the other to a vertical support structure(502), said vertical support structure (502) having an exterior face such that the full weight of each precast concrete exterior cladding panel is transferred directly into the vertical support structure by panel hanger means(108, 110), a continuous air space is formed between the inner panel faces of the precast concrete exterior cladding panels and the exterior face of the vertical support structure, a vertical gap is provided between the two precast concrete exterior cladding panels, forming an unsealed horizontal joint space between the two precast concrete exterior cladding panels that prevents vertical load transfer between the two precast concrete exterior cladding panels while enabling drainage of water from the horizontal joint space, the outer panel faces of the two precast concrete cladding panels are exposed to the weather. Olczyk et al does not show the upper panel edge having a surface with a convex protrusion, the lower panel edge having a concave groove and is matingly engageable with the concave upper profile of the upper panel edge, the convex profile on the upper panel edge of the lower one of the two precast panels extends into the concave profile of the lower edge of the upper one of the two panels, so as to visually occlude the horizontal joint space between the two exterior cladding panels. Peck figures 3-4, shows the upper panel edge(B) having a surface with a convex protrusion, the lower panel (A) edge having a concave groove and is matingly engageable with the concave upper profile of the upper panel edge, the convex profile on the upper panel edge of the lower one of the two precast panels extends into the concave profile of the lower edge of the upper one of the two panels, so as to visually occlude the horizontal joint space between the two exterior cladding panels. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Olczyk et al’s structure with a reasonable expectation of success to show the upper panel edge having a surface with a convex protrusion, the lower panel edge having a concave groove and is matingly engageable with the concave upper profile of the upper panel edge, the convex profile on the upper panel edge of the lower one of the two precast panels extends into the concave profile of the lower edge of the upper one of the two panels, so as to visually occlude the horizontal joint space between the two exterior cladding panels as taught by Peck in order to smoothy join two panel edges together, and since convex/concave joint would provide the same function of joining panels together as other shaped and ribs, one having ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to substitute one shape for another as long as the replacement shape provides the needed functions of joining panels together. Per claims 10-11, Olczyk et al as taught by Peck further shows the convex profile of the upper panel edge is defined by one or more curved lines (inherently so as the lines together forming the curving line per Peck teaching), the one or more curved lines comprise a circular line. Per claim 12, Olczyk et al as modified further shows the convex profile of the upper panel edge of each precast concrete exterior cladding panel is defined two or more straight lines(inherently so as the lines together forming the curving line per Peck teaching; see also figure 3 for the different bendings). Per claim 13, Olczyk et al as modified further shows at least one of the precast concrete exterior cladding panels further has a first panel side edge and a second panel side edge, each having a convex profile that extends from the outer panel face to the inner panel face. Per claim 14, Olczyk et al as modified further shows at least one of the precast concrete exterior cladding panels further has a first panel side edge and a second panel side edge, each having a concave profile that extends from the outer panel face to the inner panel face. Per claim 15, Olczyk et al as modified further shows at least one of the precast concrete exterior cladding panels further has a first panel side edge having a convex profile that extends from the outer panel face to the inner panel face, and a second panel side edge having a concave profile that extends from the outer panel face to the inner panel face. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 9-15 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. The Declaration under 37 CFR 1.132 filed 12/17/2025 is sufficient to overcome the rejection of claims 9-15 based upon Yamaguchi. The newly amended claims, are newly rejected by Olczyk et al in view of Peck. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The prior art shows different cladding panel systems. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHI D Tran whose telephone number is (571)272-6864. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, BRIAN GLESSNER can be reached at 571-272-6754. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHI D A/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 25, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 08, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 15, 2023
Response Filed
Jan 28, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
May 01, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
May 30, 2024
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
May 30, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 30, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 01, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 07, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 07, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 24, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 17, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 22, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601188
Support Plate for Installing Tile
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595665
DRY-LAID TILE STRUCTURE AND LAYING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584347
INSTALLATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12560022
CUSTOMIZABLE WINDOW AND DOOR SYSTEM FOR SEVERE WEATHER PROTECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12559946
DEVICES CONFIGURED TO OPERATE ON AN ANGLED SURFACE, AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+22.3%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1070 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month