Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/712,121

SYNCHRONOUS MICROTHREADING

Final Rejection §101§102§103
Filed
Apr 02, 2022
Examiner
HUANG, BRYAN PAI SONG
Art Unit
2114
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Intel Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
14 granted / 18 resolved
+22.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+5.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
39
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
§103
40.8%
+0.8% vs TC avg
§102
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
§112
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 18 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s amendments to the Specification have addressed issues raised in objections to the Specification. The objections to the specification have been withdrawn. Applicant’s statement, see Claim Interpretation, filed September 24, 2025, with respect to interpretation of the claims under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) has been fully considered. New rejections of claims 9 – 20 under 35 U.S.C. 101 are made in light of this statement. Applicant’s arguments, see 35 U.S.C. § 112 Rejections, filed September 24, 2025, with respect to rejections of the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 112 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejections of the claims have been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments, see Claim Rejections - 35 U.S.C. § 102 and Claim Rejections - 35 U.S.C. § 103, filed September 24, 2025, with respect to rejections of the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The amendments have overcome the previously cited prior art of record. The rejections of the claims have been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 9 – 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claims do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter. Claims 9 – 20 recite software per se. The claim term ‘microcode’ is software instructions. Given the broadest reasonable interpretation and the claim interpretation argued by the applicant, the claim term ‘fault handler’ may be construed as a computer program, i.e. software per se. Regarding claims 15 – 20, under the broadest reasonable interpretation of the claims, the claim term ‘memory’ encompasses non-statutory subject matter. See at least MPEP 2106.03(II). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 – 7 allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: A search of the prior art did not find a single piece of prior art, or combination thereof, which would teach or suggest all limitations of the independent claims. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRYAN PAI SONG HUANG whose telephone number is (571)272-0510. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 11:30 AM - 8:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ASHISH THOMAS can be reached at (571) 272-0631. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /B.P.H./Examiner, Art Unit 2114 /MICHAEL MASKULINSKI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2113
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 02, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 25, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §102, §103
Sep 24, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 12, 2025
Final Rejection — §101, §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12591504
Method and apparatus for monitoring - with contention mitigation - avionics application(s) running on a platform with multi-core processor, related electronic avionics system and computer program
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585544
USING A DURABLE FUTURE TO RESUME EXECUTION OF AN OPERATION AFTER A PROCESS THAT INCLUDES THE OPERATION CRASHES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12572434
DISASTER RECOVERY USING INCREMENTAL DATABASE RECOVERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12566684
AVOIDING FAILED TRANSACTIONS WITH ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE BASED MONITORING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12541440
REDUNDANCY AND SWAPPING SCHEME FOR MEMORY REPAIR
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+5.0%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 18 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month