Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/732,567

ROD STRUCTURE USED IN ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Apr 29, 2022
Priority
Jun 18, 2021 — TW 110122356
Examiner
MASINICK, JONATHAN PETER
Art Unit
3678
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Fivegrand International Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
521 granted / 759 resolved
+16.6% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+33.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
776
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
74.5%
+34.5% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 759 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Examiner acknowledges the response filed 3/27/2026. Claims 1-27 remain pending in the application. Claims 7-27 remain withdrawn, claims 1-6 are prosecuted below. Drawings The drawings were received on 3/27/2026. These drawings are approved and entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wang (US 9441653). Re Clm 1: Wang discloses a rod structure (figs 1-23) used in an electronic device (motherboard or housing), comprising: an engaging rod (10), comprising a rod (10), the rod comprising an assembly portion (any portion of the rod, for example, a central portion on either side of the fastener assembly) and a push portion (left or right end portions of 10), the assembly portion movably assembled at an engaged object (20), and the push portion for pushing a pushed object (Examiner notes that the end portion of rod 10 is capable of “pushing a pushed object”); and a fastener (including elements 1, 2, 3, and 4), for engaging the engaging rod at the engaged object (see figs), wherein when the fastener is engaged with or disengaged from the engaged object, the engaging rod is for causing the push portion to push against the pushed object (when the elements 10 and 20 are connected via the fastener, the rod 10 is capable of pushing the push portion against a pushed object), wherein the assembly portion and the fastener are disposed at different position along the rod and spaced apart from each other (Examiner notes that the “assembly portion” is vague and can be any portion on rod 10. The “assembled portion” relied upon can be a central portion of 10 that is outside of the fastener structure, therefore, being at different positions along the rod and spaced from each other). Re Clm 2: Wang discloses a rod structure (figs 1-23) used in an electronic device (motherboard or housing), comprising: an engaging rod (10), comprising a rod (10), the rod comprising an assembly portion (central portion), the assembly portion movably assembled at an assembled object (20); and a fastener (including elements 1, 2, 3, and 4), for engaging the engaging rod at an engaged object (see figs), wherein the assembly portion and the fastener are disposed at different position along the rod and spaced apart from each other (Examiner notes that the “assembly portion” is vague and can be any portion on rod 10. The “assembled portion” relied upon can be a central portion of 10 that is outside of the fastener structure, therefore, being at different positions along the rod and spaced from each other). Re Clms 3 and 4: Wang discloses wherein the fastener comprises an engaging portion (2), a body (1), a trigger portion (3) and an elastic element (4); the engaging portion is for engaging at a counterpart engaging portion of the engaged object (20, see figs 2 and 3), the body is for assembling at a rod of the engaging rod (1 is assembled on rod 10), the trigger portion is located at the body (see figs), the engaging portion passes through the body and is movably assembled at the trigger portion (at 322), the elastic element is disposed between the engaging portion and the body (see spring 4 location), the trigger portion is for being triggered to prompt the engaging portion to be elastically moved or moved up and down in the body (via spring 4); the engaging portion comprises a head (221), and the head is for elastically sandwiching or engaging the counterpart engaging portion of the engaged object via an elastic force of the elastic element (see figs 2 and 3). Re Clms 5 and 6: Wang discloses wherein the trigger portion and the engaging portion are assembled by a pivotal connection in between (pivotal connection at 322), and the trigger portion is for being triggered between an engaging state (fig 2) and a lifted state (fig 3); in the engaging state, the engaging portion is engaged at the counterpart engaging portion of the object (see fig 2), the trigger portion is movably assembled at an engaging height between a pivotal portion of the engaging portion and the body; in the lifted state, the engaging portion is disengaged from the counterpart engaging portion of the object (fig 3). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 3/27/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues on pages 5-6 that Wang fails to disclose wherein the assembly portion and the fastener are disposed at different position along the rod and spaced apart from each other. Examiner disagrees and notes (as presented in the rejection above) that the “assembly portion” is vague and over generalized limitation and can be any portion on rod 10, based on the broadest reasonable interpretation. The “assembled portion” relied upon can be any portion of 10 that is outside of the fastener structure, therefore, being at different positions along the rod and spaced from each other. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JONATHAN PETER MASINICK whose telephone number is (571)270-3060. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8a-5p EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber Anderson can be reached at (571)270-5281. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JONATHAN P MASINICK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3678
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 29, 2022
Application Filed
Dec 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 27, 2026
Response Filed
May 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680563
HYBRID BUTT-LAP JOINT, AND METHOD OF PRODUCTION
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680332
Lattice Assembly
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668989
BOARD CLEAT APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MIXED MATERIAL HORIZONTAL ALUMINUM FENCE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661283
VEHICLE ACCESS RAMP
4y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12662782
IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO BARRIER STANDS
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+33.9%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 759 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month