Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 17/733,566

IMMUNOGENIC COMPOSITION AGAINST INFLUENZA

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 29, 2022
Priority
May 03, 2021 — provisional 63/183,624 +3 more
Examiner
LI, BAO Q
Art Unit
1671
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Pfizer, Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
678 granted / 893 resolved
+15.9% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
921
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
§112
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 893 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Remark Applicants’ response and amendment were filed on Nov. 06, 2025. Claims 4 and 21 were amended. Claims 4-5, 8-21, 24-26, 28-30, 32-33 with elected species of 1-methylpseudouridine and the 1st antigen is HA, subunit H1 and the second antigen is HA different from H1 strain are considered. Claims 1-3, 22-23, 27, 31 and 34-36 were withdrawn from consideration. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. (Withdrawn) The rejection of Claims 4-5, 8-12,16-19, 21, 24-26, 28-30 and 32-33 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over (Molecular Therapy, 2020, April 19, Vol. 28 (7), pages 1569-1584) to Freyn et al. has been removed necessitated by Applicants’ amendment for changing the HA antigen is a full length. (New Group of rejection): Claims 4-5, 8-12,16-19, 21, 24-26, 28-30 and 32-33 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over US 2023/0181715A1 to Nachbagauer et al. The rejected claims are drawn to an immunogenic composition comprising three nucleotide RNA molecules, The first RNA polynucleotide encodes a full length of hemagglutinin (HA) polypeptide, second RNA polynucleotide encodes a second influenza viral antigen or an immunogenic fragment thereof, and a third one comprising an open reading fragment encodings a third influenza viral antigen or its fragment thereof, wherein the an influenza viral antigens or its fragment thereof that are each from other, wherein each of them is formulated in a lipid nanoparticle (LNP) respectively, wherein the LN is cationic lipid. The antigen is HA as well as other but different each from other and the RNA polynucleotide comprises a modified nucleotide, with 1-methylpseudouridine Nachbagauer et al. teach an invention related to a composition and a method for making or using the compositions to induce an immune response against at least one influenza infection. The composition comprises mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (mRNA-LNP) vaccines comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding full-length HA immunogens or a modified mRNA-LNP platform with optimized stalk-inducing headless HA immunogens alone or in combination with one or more antigens, adjuvants or a combination thereof, wherein the combination of other influenza viral antigens are NA, NP, and M2e. (See Summary of Invention ). The lipid nanoparticles are included in a formulation comprising a nucleoside-modified RNA as described herein. In some embodiments, such lipid nanoparticles comprise a cationic lipid (See paragraph [0239]). In various embodiments, the lipid nanoparticles have a mean diameter of from about 30 nm to about 150 nm, from about 40 nm to about 150 nm etc. (See paragraph [0240]). They also teach that at [0219] that one embodiment, the nucleoside is also modified with following group selected rom group consisting of m1acp3Ψ (1-methyl-3-(3-amino-3-carboxypropyl) pseudouridine. In another embodiment, the modified nucleoside is m1Ψ (1-methylpseudouridine). In another embodiment, the modified nucleoside is Ψm (2′-O-methylpseudouridine). In another embodiment, the modified nucleoside is m5D (5-methyldihydrouridine). In another embodiment, the modified nucleoside is m3Ψ (3-methylpseudouridine). They also teach at [0201] that one embodiment, the mRNA has both a cap on the 5′ end and a 3′ UTR and also3’ poly(A) tail . The cited reference also teach several lipids of formulars same as claimed in claims 19-and 20 (See Tables I & II) as well as in some embodiments, the LNPs comprise a lipid of Formula (I), a nucleoside- modified RNA and one or more excipients selected from neutral lipids, steroids and pegylated lipids (See Formular I and Table I). The cited reference also teaches that the influenza virus is an influenza HA group 1 virus, influenza NA group 1 virus, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the influenza HA group 1 virus is H1, H2, H5, H6, H8, H9, H11, H12, H13, H16, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the influenza NA group 1 virus is N1, N4, N5, N8, or any combination thereof. Thus, in some embodiments, the influenza virus is H1N1, H2N2, H3N2, H5N1, H7N7, H1N2, H9N2, H7N2, H7N3, H10N7, H7N9, H6N1, or any combination thereof. (See paragraph of Description). While the cited reference do not explicitly teach that the composition comprising 1st and 2nd and 3rd RNA molecules encoding an antigens from different strains, they teaches that the studies used monovalent full-length PR8 or A/Cal09 HA-encoding mRNA-LNP vaccines. Importantly, even these vaccines induced protection from homologous, heterologous and heterosubtypic viruses in mice after one or two immunizations. Therefore, although not bound by any particular theory, it was hypothesized that the use of optimized HA immunogens and the combination of four fairly conserved antigens (headless HA-ferritin, NA, NP and M2e) in multivalent vaccines result in significantly increased protective efficacy. During the course of this study, nucleoside-modified mRNA-LNP formulations encoding influenza A group 1, influenza A group 2 and influenza B antigens (HA, NA, NP and M2e) are evaluated individually and in combined formulations. It would have been obvious for a person ordinarily skilled in the art to be motivated by the cited reference for making a multivalent influenza vaccine using the RNA molecules encoding HA, NA, NP and M2e from different strains to obtain expected results with a reasonable expectation of success. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BAO Q LI whose telephone number is (571)272-0904. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 am to 8 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allen Michael can be reached at 571-270-3497 and the fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BAO Q. LI Examiner Art Unit 1671 /BAO Q LI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1671
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 29, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 06, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 12, 2026
Final Rejection — §103
Apr 14, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 01, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12613239
LIVE IMAGING SYSTEM TO VISUALIZE THE RETRO-TRANSCRIBED VIRAL DNA GENOME
4y 0m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12589149
METHOD OF MODULATING MUCOSAL IMMUNOGENICITY
4y 6m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589141
DNA VACCINE CAPABLE OF EFFECTIVELY TREATING AND/OR PREVENTING TYPE 1 DIABETES AND USE THEREOF
3y 11m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589147
MULTIVALENT HVT VECTOR VACCINE
3y 9m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582725
AAV VECTORS WITH MYELIN PROTEIN ZERO PROMOTER AND USES THEREOF FOR TREATING SCHWANN CELL-ASSOCIATED DISEASES LIKE CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH DISEASE
4y 3m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+26.4%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 893 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month