Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/741,779

Discharge Device having a Short-Circuiting Element, and Discharge Method

Final Rejection §112
Filed
May 11, 2022
Examiner
WEINMANN, RYU-SUNG PETER
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
3 (Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
12 granted / 18 resolved
-1.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
63
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
42.8%
+2.8% vs TC avg
§102
32.4%
-7.6% vs TC avg
§112
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 18 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The Amendment filed 1/7/2026 has been entered. Claims 1, 3-4, 6-13, and 15-19 remain pending in the application, and claims 2, 5, and 14 have been canceled. Applicant’s amendments to the Claims have overcome every and claim objection and 103 rejection previously set forth in the Non-Final Office Action mailed 7/9/2025. The new grounds of rejection presented below are necessitated by the amendments. Accordingly, this Office Action is made Final. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the following limitations in one of or in both claims 1 and 12 must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. the plurality of electrical contacts are located down-circuit of the plurality of non-return devices relative to the flow of electricity the short-circuiting element is a separate element from a housing of the discharge device Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Objections Claim 11 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 11 recites “the plurality of battery cells.” Claim 11 is written as introducing a method. It would therefore be appropriate to introducing “a plurality of battery cells.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 1-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 12 recite “the short-circuiting element is a separate element from a housing of the discharge device.” The concept does not seem to be described in the Specification. In paragraph [64] of the PGPub, housing is described in relation to electrical grounding. Claims 2-11 and 13-19 inherit the deficiencies of either claim 1 or claim 12, do not overcome the deficiencies, and are therefore also rejected under 112(a) for failing to comply with the written description requirement. Appropriate correction is required. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1 and 12 recite “the short-circuiting element is a separate element from a housing of the discharge device.” It is not clear how the short circuiting element is separate from the housing of the discharge device as it seems structurally integrated to the invention as a whole. Claims 1 and 12 recite “the plurality of electrical contacts are located down-circuit of the plurality of non-return devices relative to the flow of electricity during the discharge process.” The position of electrical contacts 103 in Fig. 1 appear to be between the batteries 105 and the non-return devices 107. If electric flow is away from the battery such as for discharging or short-circuiting, it would seem the flow would first leave the battery 105, pass through the electrical contact 103, and then pass through the non-return device 107. It would seem that the plurality of electrical contacts are located up-circuit of the plurality of non-return devices relative to the flow of electricity during the discharge process. It is unclear how the electrical contacts are described to be down-circuit of the non-return devices during a discharge process. Claims 2-11 and 13-19 inherit the deficiencies of either claim 1 or claim 12, do not overcome the deficiencies, and are therefore also rejected under 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter. Appropriate correction or clarification is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-19 are allowable over prior art. The following is an examiner's statement of reasons for indicating allowable subject matter: Regarding claims 1 and 12, the prior art of record as considered and understood by the examiner does not teach or fairly suggest: the plurality of electrical contacts are located down-circuit of the plurality of non-return devices relative to the flow of electricity during the discharge process, taken in combination with the other limitations of each claim 1 and claim 12 respectively. Claims 2-11 and 13-19 are allowable over prior art by virtue of their dependence from either claim 1 or claim 12. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Ryu-Sung P. Weinmann whose telephone number is (703)756-5964. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julian Huffman, can be reached at (571) 272-2147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or (571) 272-1000. /Ryu-Sung P. Weinmann/Examiner, Art Unit 2859 March 15, 2026 /JULIAN D HUFFMAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 11, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Apr 28, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jan 07, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 15, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12556022
CHARGING METHOD AND APPARATUS, VEHICLE, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12556014
BATTERY CONTROL DEVICE, BATTERY SYSTEM, POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM, AND BATTERY CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12545136
VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12537337
ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12512687
METHOD FOR CHARGING AN ENERGY STORE, MOBILE DEVICE AND CHARGING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+10.7%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 18 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month